Andhra Pradesh Court November 2007 Judgments
Kadiyala Appa Rao (Died) Per L.Rs. Vs. Kadiyala Kamalamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(3)ALD13; 2008(4)ALT405
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, the learned Counsel representing the appellant and Sri N. Sriram Murthy, the learned Counsel representing the respondent.2. This Court on 18.12.1998, made the following order:In view of the substantial questions of law raised in para 17(a) to (e) of the memorandum of grounds of appeal, the second appeal is admitted.The said grounds read as under:a) Whether the judgment of the lower appellate Court is in accordance with the provisions of Order 41 of CPC when it failed to consider and framed the issues to be decided in the appeal in the light of Order 41 of CPC.b) Whether the decree and judgment of the lower appellate Court is correct when it had reversed the findings of fact recorded by the trial Court based on oral evidence, exceeding the powers conferred under Section 107 of CPC. c) Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in arriving at a conclusion that Ex.B1 Will is surrounded by suspicious circumstances and the said circumstance...
Tag this Judgment!Mastrusri Educational Society, a Society Registered Under Public Socie ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD354; 2008(3)ALT247
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These four writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner and against the same respondent. The petitioner-Society entered into agreements of sale, for purchase of Ac.49.23 guntas of land in various survey numbers of Bowrampet Village of Kuthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the year 1982. Sale deeds were executed in its favour, in respect of Ac.40.90 guntas, up to December 1990. As regards the balance extent of Ac.9.04 guntas, sale deeds were executed on 12-08-1991, and they were presented for registration. The consideration for the lands was shown at Rs. 10,000/- per acre, in the agreements of sale. On the basis of the value mentioned in the basic registers, maintained by the office of the Sub-Registrar, the 1st respondent, stamp duty and registration charges were paid Rs. 16,500/- per acre, which was also the value adopted for the sale deeds in respect of Ac.40.90 guntas.2. The 1st respondent doubted the correctness of the market value, furnished by ...
Tag this Judgment!Nagamma and ors. Vs. G. Kamalamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD794; 2008(1)ALT281
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.1. The appellants, defendants in O.S. No. 37 of 1982 on the file of the Prl. Subordinate Judge, Chittoor, have preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 1995 of 1988 dated 28-4-2000. The parties shall, hereinafter, be referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.2. The widow of Sri G. Govindarajulu Naidu and the widow, son and daughter of Sri G. Nandagopal Naidu, (son of Sri Govindarajulu Naidu), filed the suit in O.S. No. 37 of 1982 for declaration of title and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. It is their case that in the year 1974 there were thatched houses in the suit schedule property in the occupation of tenants, that with a view to get them evicted Sri G. Govindarajulu Naidu had transferred the property in the name of the defendant who was his close confidante and was assisting him in household work and running errands for him, that the...
Tag this Judgment!Vippala Srinivasa Reddy S/O Lakshma Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)477; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)173
Gopala Krishna Tamada, J.1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11-11-2003 passed in S.C. No. 552 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, convicting and sentencing the first appellant - A-1 of the charge under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the second appellant - A-2 of the charge under Section 304-B read with 34 of IPC, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years each.2. The case of prosecution, in nutshell, is that the marriage between one Vippala Madhavi (hereinafter called as 'the deceased') and A-1 was performed in the month of May, 1996 and the parents of the deceased, who were examined as PWs.1 and 2 gave a cash of Rs. 10,000/- and also gifted Ac.1-00 of land towards pasupukunkuma. The marriage was immediately consummated and the deceased joined the company of A-1, where his mother i.e., A-2 also is residing. Since the date of joining the deceased with A-1 for conjugal life, both A-1...
Tag this Judgment!N. Vivekananda Swamy Vs. State Acb Kurnool Range
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ1325
P. Swaroop Reddy, J.1. This revision case is filed against the order of the learned Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in Memo.SR.No. 675 of 2007 in C.C. No. 27 of 2006.2. The facts are as follows: The petitioner, who is the accused in the above Calendar Case, was facing prosecution for possessing disproportionate assets worth Rs. 41,00,645.00 in his name, in the name of his dependents, his family members and relatives.3. The petitioner-accused joined in government service as an Assistant Executive Engineer on 1.2.1978; promoted as Deputy Executive Engineer on 15.3.2002 and was working as Deputy Executive Engineer in Guru Raghavendra Project Sub Division, Mantralayam, Kurnool District. The investigation revealed that he was in possession of assets in his name and in the name of his dependents, his family members and relatives. The income of the accused-officer for the check period was Rs. 44,08,071.00; his expenditure was calculated at Rs. 32,97,8...
Tag this Judgment!N. Vivekananda Chetty S/O. N. Rangaiah Vs. the State A.C.B., Kurnool R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)360; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)160
P. Swaroop Reddy, J.1. This revision case is filed against the order of the learned Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in Memo. SR. No. 675 of 2007 in C.C. No. 27 of 2006.2. The facts are as follows: The petitioner who is the accused in the above Calendar Case, was facing prosecution for possessing disproportionate assets worth Rs. 41,00,645.00 in his name, in the name of his dependents, his family members and relatives.3. The petitioner-accused joined in government service as an Assistant Executive Engineer on 1.2.1978; promoted as Deputy Executive Engineer on 15.3.2002 and was working as Deputy Executive Engineer in Guru Raghavendra Project Sub Division, Mantralayam, Kurnool District. The investigation revealed that he was in possession of assets in his name and in the name of his dependents, his family members and relatives. The income of the accused-officer for the check period was Rs. 44,08,071.00; his expenditure was calculated at Rs. 32,97,...
Tag this Judgment!Juguna Bai and anr. Vs. Sardar Surjeet Singh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(2)ALD837
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two revisions are filed, challenging the final decree dated 5.2.2007, passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, in O.S. No. 54 of 1981. CRP No. 3144 of 2007 is filed by defendant No. 4, and CRP No. 3914 of 2007 is filed by defendant Nos.2 and 3, in the suit. The 1st respondent, in both the revisions, is the plaintiff. The 1st defendant died, and the plaintiff claims to be her sole legal representative. The dispute, between the parties, has a chequered career.2. The circumstances that gave rise to the filing of the CRPs are as under:For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the suit.One Sri Sardar Santh Singh had two wives by name Rama Bai and Juguna Bai, i.e. defendants 1 and 2. The plaintiff was adopted son of Santh Singh and his wife Rama Bai. The 3rd defendant by name, Sathnam Kaur, is the daughter of Santh Singh, through Juguna Bai, the 2nd defendant. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition of suit schedul...
Tag this Judgment!Sri. K. Srinivas S/O. Rama Swamy and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. the Government ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(3)ALD241; 2008(4)ALT53
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. In these batch of writ petitions the petitioners, transport operators whose vehicles are covered by subsisting permits valid to ply as contract carriages in the State of Andhra Pradesh, have questioned the vires of Section 3-A of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, as inserted by the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act, 2006 (Act 33 of 2006), and the notification issued in G.O.Ms. No. 180, Transport, Roads 85 Buildings (Tr.I) Department dated 27.09.2006.2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh had, hitherto, issued G.O.Ms. No. 77 dated 01.06.2002 prescribing a new rate of tax of Rs. 3500/- per seat per quarter in respect of stage carriages plying a distance exceeding 1000 km a day. On a challenge thereto a Larger bench of this Court, in L. Royal Reddy v. Government of Andhra Pradesh : AIR2004AP347 , had held that, since the charging section under the A. P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act did not authorize levy of additional tax in cas...
Tag this Judgment!Syed TurbuddIn and anr. Vs. the State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)397; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)236; 2008CriLJ2159
Gopal Krishna Tamada, J.1. The II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, tried the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 826 of 2000 and three others (A3 to A5) for the of fence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and first appellant for the offence punishable Section 25(1)(B)(b) of the Indian Arms Act in Sessions Case No. 551 of 1995. Initially, case was registered against A1 to A5 and others, but as the other persons, were not apprehended as on the date of filing of the charge sheet, the appellants and A3 to A5 were only tried. The trial Court, on an analysis of both ocular and documentary evidence, came to the conclusion that A3 to A5 are not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 395, IPC, and A1 is not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 25(1)(B)(b) of the Indian Arms Act, however, A1 and A2 are guilty of the offence punishable under Section 392, IPC and accordingly by Judgment dated 29-6-2000,, convicted and sentenced them ...
Tag this Judgment!Rami Setty Siva Sankar Rao Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Secretary to ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-29-2007
Reported in: 2008(4)ALD460; 2008(1)ALT300
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Rami Setty Siva Sankar Rao, the writ petitioner, filed the present writ petition for a Writ of Certiorari calling for records and quash the impugned proceedings in G.O. Ms. No. 83 dated 27.01.2006 issued by the first respondent insofar as exempting Sri Sangameshwaraswamy Temple situated at Sangam Jagarlamudi village, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District, from the operation of provisions of Section 15 and 29 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (Act No. 30 of 1987) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for the purpose of convenience) for a period of three years by declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of Section 154 of the Act and pass such other suitable orders.2. The said G.O. Ms. No. 83 dated 27.01.2006 reads as hereunder:Government of Andhra PradeshAbstractEndowments Department - Guntur District - Rachuru Temples, Rachuru. Bhattiporlu (M) - Exemption from the operation of provi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »