Andhra Pradesh Court January 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Shankar Lingam Vs. Meharunnissa Begum and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)ALD578; 2007(2)ALT475
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The matter is coming up for admission.2. Heard Sri Pankaj Reddy, the earned Counsel representing the revision petitioner and Sri Ramakrishna, the earned Counsel representing the respondents.3. Sri Pankaj Reddy, the earned Counsel representing the revision petitioner had taken this Court through the reasons recorded by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal in LA. No. 3057/2006 in O.S. No. 93/2003 and would contend that in the facts and circumstances instead of adopting a liberal approach in summoning the witness by name Merugu Yadagiri to examine him as a witness before the Court, without recording proper reasons, the learned Judge had dismissed the application and the discretion was not exercised judiciously. The earned Counsel relied on several decisions to substantiate his contentions.4. Per contra, Sri Ramakrishna, the earned Counsel representing the respondents had taken this Court through the reasons recorded in Paras 6 and 7 of the Order impu...
T. Deveswar Reddy, Area Manager, Nagarjuna Fertilizers Chemicals Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2996
A. Gopal Reddy, J.1. These three Criminal Petitions involving common questions of fact and law were heard together and are being disposed of by this Common Order.2. A learned single Judge of this Court who heard Criminal Petition Nos. 4111 and 414 of 2003 noticing the conflicting views in Thungabhdra Chemicals and Fertilizers Co. Limited v. Assistant Director of Agriculture (Regular) Yerragondpaalem, Judgment in Crl P. No. 5462 of 2001 and batch dated 22-2-2006 reported in 2006 (2) Andh LT (Cri) 103 and in T. Deveswar Reddy, Area Manager, Nagarjuna Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited v. Assistant Director of Agriculture, Hyderabad, Judgment in Crl P. No. 4102 of 2003 dated 5-4-2006 on the question as to whether the law laid down by this Court in District and Sessions Judge, Cuntur v. State of A.P., Hyderabad 2000 (1) ALT (Cri) 103 (DB) (AP). would also apply to offences committed prior to 30-6-1999 the date of order of the Division Bench, by order dated 7-6-2006 referred the matter for an ...
Shaik VazeeruddIn Vs. Kaikalur Gram Panchayat and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)ALD523; 2007(2)ALT539
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court ordered notice before admission on 20-12-2006. Sri M. Prabhakar Rao had taken notice on behalf of 1st respondent and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj had taken notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 and the Counsel for petitioner was permitted to take out notice to the 4th respondent and file proof of service. It is stated that the 4th respondent is served and proof of service in relation thereto also had been filed.2. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner Shaik Vazeeruddin praying for a writ of mandamus declaring L.Dis. No. 1719/2-006-PTS-4, dated 22-11-2006 of the District Panchayat Officer as illegal, irregular, ultra vires and unsustainable and to set aside the same holding that the 4th respondent has suffered disqualification and is not entitled to continue as Member of 14th Ward of Kaikaluru Gram Panchayat, Krishna District and to pass such other suitable orders.3. The order referred to supra impugned in the pr...
D. Sujatha Vs. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)ALD249; 2007(2)ALT248
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court ordered notice before admission on 26-9-2006. Sri R. Prem Sagar had taken notice on behalf of R-1 and R-2 and the counsel for petitioner was permitted to take out notice to R-3 and file proof of service. R-3 is served and learned Counsel Sri A.Sanjeeva Reddy represents R-3. In W.P.M.P.No.25498 of 2006 this Court granted interim suspension for a period of three weeks, which is being extended for a limited period from time to time.2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.B2/2282/2006, dated 16.9.2006, issued by the first respondent whereby intimating the petitioner that she incurred disqualification to continue as M.P.T.C. Member, Koripally and President, Mandal Parishad, Kodakandla, Warangal District, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction; and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as M.P.T.C. Member, Koripally and President, Mandal Parishad, Kodakandla, Warangal District,...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Parvathi Ramachandram and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2007
Reported in: 2008ACJ2495; 2007(5)ALD234
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since the point involved in all these appeals is one and the same and since all the appeals arise out of a common award passed by the Tribunal, all these appeals are being disposed of by a common order.2. In all these cases claimants filed claim petitions against the owner of the bus and the appellant who is said to be insurer of the bus involved in the accident under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act) seeking compensation for the deaths of and injuries to the victims in an accident due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus. Owner of the bus involved in the accident chose to remain ex parte both before the Tribunal and in this Court. Appellant contested the claim petitions alleging that it is not liable to pay any compensation to the claimants as it cancelled the cover note issued to the owner of the bus long prior to the date of accident, as the cheque issued by him to it towards premium was dishonoured.3. The Tribunal...
Karan WoosIn Limited Employees Union Rep. by Its President and ors. Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2007
Reported in: 2008(6)ALT453
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. Petitioner No. 1, namely Karan Woosin Limited Employees' Union, represented by its President and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, laid off workmen in their individual capacity, have filed this writ petition assailing the notice dated 31.01.2002, issued calling upon the petitioners to appear before the Additional Commissioner, and the final orders dated 07.02.2002, passed by respondent No. 2, granting permission to respondent No. 5, namely M/s. Karan Woosin Limited, to lay off 24 workmen, and the order dated 23.07.2005, confirming the orders dated 07.02.2002, as being without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice.2. Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are workmen, working in respondent No. 5 - company, while petitioner No. 1 is the Employees' Union in the company. Respondent No. 5, it appears made an application dated 18.01.2002 to the Commissioner of Labour, to grant permission to lay off 24 workmen. Acting on the said application, the C...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›