Andhra Pradesh Court July 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pamandi Sathish Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its P.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ942
G. Yethirajulu, J. 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed A-1 in Sessions Case No. 252 of 2003 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.2. The appellant and another accused were charged for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'I.P.C.') for allegedly stabbing the deceased-N.Raju at about 11.30 p.m. on 18- 10-2001 indiscriminately resulting his death. The accused denied the charges and claimed for trial.3. The case of prosecution, leading to the conviction of appellant, is briefly as follows:PW-1 is the mother and PW-2 is the brother of deceased. The deceased and accused are residents of the same area.A-1 and A-2 suspected the deceased having illicit intimacy with the daughter of A-2 and there was an altercation among them. On 18-10-2001 at about 11 p.m. A-1 and A-2 went to the house of deceased and A-2 questioned him as to where did he take her daughter. They searched the house ...
Alaparthi Venkata Chalapathi Rao Vs. Commissioner of Endowments and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD764; 2006(6)ALT84
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J. 1. A short and interesting question as to the purport of Sub-sections (3) and (5) of Section 87 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short 'the Act') falls for consideration in this case.2. The petitioner assails the order of the 1st respondent bearing Rc. No. Dl/17641/ 06 dated 30-5-2006 whereby the order of the 2nd respondent dated 18-2-2006 has been declined confirmation by the 1st respondent and rejected.3. The 2nd respondent, by the order dated 18-2-2006 in O.A. No. 74 of 2005 declared the petitioner to be a grandson of 'Alaparthi Venkatachalam', the founder of Sri Alaparthamma Ammavari Temple, Allaparru Village, Nagaram Mandal, Guntur District and therefore a member of the founder's family. O.A. was allowed as was the claim for recognition as a member of the founder's family.4. By the impugned order, the 1st respondent recorded that the 2nd respondent had taken up O.A. No. 74 of 2005 for trial on se...
M. Rami Reddy Vs. Special Commissioner of Land Revenue, Govt. of A.P. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALT90
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is a resident of Patrapalle village of Thavanampalle Mandal of Chittoor District. He was assigned agricultural land admeasuring Acs.5.46 in survey No. 144/1B of Sarakallu village in Thavanampalle Mandal by way of Dharakast patta DKT patta. The fourth respondent herein allegedly tried to interfere with the possession, constrained by which the petitioner filed a suit being O.S.No. 1071 of 1978 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Munsif, Chittoor, for permanent injunction. The same was statedly decreed on 27-02-1987 against the fourth respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the fourth respondent filed A.S.No. 54 of 1987, which was also dismissed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Chittoor on 08-11 -1995. While the civil suit was pending, the fourth respondent also filed appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer RDO, Chittoor, third respondent herein, who by order, dated 10-07-1986 cancelled the patta on the ground that the peti...
Senior Divisional Manager, New India Insurance Co., Ltd. Vs. K. Kiran ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2006
Reported in: 2007ACJ1153; 2007(1)ALD463; 2006(6)ALT1
G. Chandraiah, J.1. Heard Mrs. I. Mammu Vani learned Standing Counsel for the appellant - Insurance Company and Sri K.L.N. Rao and Sri M. Vijay Reddy, Counsel for the respondents.2. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 17-9-1999 passed by the Chairman, A.P.M.V. Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad in O.P.No. 140/ 1998, the Insurance Company filed this appeal.3. The facts with regard to the occurrence of the accident on 1-6-1998 at 5.00 a.m., while the claimant was proceeding on a lorry bearing No. AIK 6856 as a cleaner from Siddipet side towards Secunderabad due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry and the claimant suffering 75 per cent of disability on account of amputation of both of his legs, are not in dispute and further the quantum of compensation is also not being disputed by the Insurance Company, The only dispute is with regard to the liability of the Insurance Company.4. The learned Counsel appearing ...
Damodar Reddy (Died Per Lrs.), Chevella Mandal Vs. M. Mohan Reddy, Che ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2006
Reported in: AIR2007AP31; 2006(5)ALD735; 2007(3)ALT664
L. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. Shiva Reddy and Chandra Reddi were two brothers. Shiva Reddy died, leaving behind him his son Damodar Reddy. When he was aged 19 years, Damodar Reddy filed a suit being O.S. No. 104/1/1358 Fasli, in the Court of II Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against his paternal uncle, Ranga Reddy, and his sons for partition of the suit schedule lands. The suit was presented on 06-06-1947. Tw o months and a week thereafter, the country got independence and it was partitioned. About a decade thereafter, the State in which the suit was filed, was trifurcated. Few decades thence, the District in which the suit was pending, was bifurcated. The original plaintiff and the 1st defendant died. Even after six decades, the properties remained unpartitioned. It would tell, either upon the perseverance of the parties, or defect in the system, or partly both.2. O.S. No. 104/1/1358 Fasli was re-numbered as O.S. No. 27/1 of 1955. A preliminary decree was passed in the yea...
E. Subba Reddy Vs. G. Dhananjay and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2006
Reported in: AIR2007AP16; 2006(6)ALT98
ORDERGopala Krishna Tamada, J.1. As the point involved and the parties in these two revision petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal by this common order.2. A short but interesting point that falls for consideration in these revision petitions is as to whether a decree holder can maintain a petition under Section 73 C.P.C. in an Execution Petition to which the balance sale proceeds of the judgment-debtor in another Execution Petition are transferred?3. Brief facts are that the 2nd respondent herein is the judgment-debtor against whom a decree was passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad in O.S. No. 168 of 2001 which was filed by some third party. Similarly, the 1st respondent herein instituted O.S.No. 351 of 2001 and the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, decreed the suit against the 2nd respondent herein on 3-7-2002. The suit in O.S.No. 341 of 2001 instituted by the petitioner herein was also decreed against the 2nd respondent i.e. the ...
Madipeddi Rajalingam Vs. Rudroju Chinna Somaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALD169
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two second appeals are filed by the defendant in O.S. No. 66 of 1977 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, at Warangal.2. The respondent filed the suit for the relief of eviction of the appellant and any person claiming through him, from the suit schedule property and for recovery of mesne profits, for a period of three years, immediately preceding the date of filing the suit. He pleaded that the appellant is in possession of the suit schedule property with his permission, and when he was asked to vacate it, the respondent claimed that he purchased the land from one Sarvi Rajaiah, through unregistered sale deed, dated 19-4-1964 and the said Rajaiah in turn, had purchased it from the respondent, through a similar deed dated 15-5-1960. It was also pleaded that the appellant did not produce any documents, even when required to do so. The respondent claimed that the suit schedule land is his ancestral property and it was mortgaged in favour of G. Ve...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. K. Kiran and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2006
Reported in: I(2007)ACC475
G. Chandraiah, J.1. Heard Mrs. Mammu Vani, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant - Insurance Company and Mr. K.L.N. Rao and Mr. M. Vijay Reddy, Counsel for the respondents.2. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 17.9.1999 passed by the Chairman, A.P.M.V. Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad in O.P. No. 140/1998, the Insurance Company filed this appeal.3. The facts with regard to the occurrence of the accident on 1.6.1998 at 5.00 a.m., while the claimant was proceeding on a lorry bearing No. AIK 6856 as a cleaner from Siddipet side towards Secunderabad due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry and the claimant suffering 75 per cent of disability on account of amputation of both of his legs, are not in dispute and further the quantum of compensation is also not being disputed by the Insurance Company. The only dispute is with regard to the liability of the Insurance Company.4. The learned Counsel appearing for...
B. Sitaram Reddy and ors. Vs. Joint Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD261
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioners purchased land admeasuring various extents comprised in survey Nos.38, 43, 51 and 59 situated at Palwai Village of Maldakal Mandal in Mahabubnagar District. After allegedly taking permission from the Tahsildar under Section 47 of A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (the Act, for brevity), their names were also entered in Khasra Pahani for 1954-1955. In 1981, the predecessors of respondents 3 and 4 filed an application under Regulation 15(2) of A.P. (Telangana Area) Record of Rights in Land and Regulations 1358 Fasli (RoR Regulations). The second respondent, who conducted enquiry into the said application, by order dated 20.3.1991 directed to record the names of Golla Sanjanna and Golla Laxmadu on the ground that their names are mentioned in column No. 11 of pahani. The petitioners, therefore, filed a revision petition under Section 9 of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (RoR Act, for brevity) before th...
Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and ors. Vs. Balaji Traders
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALD63
G.S. Singhvi, C.J. 1. The ambit and reach of the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Cr. P.C.') to pass appropriate orders to give effect to any order made under the Cr. P.C. or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice have become subject-matter of adjudication in several cases. In R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866, the Supreme Court considered the question whether in exercise of its power under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Section 482 Cr. P.C. is pari materia to Section 561A of the 1898 Code), the High Court could quash criminal proceedings registered against the appellant who along with his mother-in-law was accused of committing offences under Sections 420, 109, 114 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant unsuccessfully filed a petition in the Punjab High Court for quashing the investigating of the First Information Report (...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »