Andhra Pradesh Court June 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pasupuleti Mohana Rao Vs. Kothamasu Ramakoteswara Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD776
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Nandigama Krishna Rao, the learned Counsel representing the respondents.2. Facts in nutshell: The unsuccessful tenant in R.C.C. No. 18/88 on the file of learned Rent Controller, Tenali and R.C.A. No. 14/92 on the file of Appellate Authority/ Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali had preferred the present civil revision petition under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, in short hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience.3. One Kothamasu Saraswatamma, the landlady filed R.C.C. No. 18/88 on the file of learned Rent Controller, Tenali on the ground of wilful default in payment of rents. The learned Rent Controller recorded the evidence of P.W.I, R.W.I and marked Exs.A-1 to A-3 and Ex.B-1 and came to the conclusion that the ground of wilful default had been established by the landlady and ordered eviction. Aggrieved by the sa...
T. Arthi Vs. K. Anand Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2006
Reported in: AIR2006AP335; 2006(5)ALD1
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Plaintiff in O.S. No. 37 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, filed this revision. She feels aggrieved by the order dated 31-3-2006 passed by the trial Court, overruling her objection as to the admissibility of an unregistered relinquishment deed.2. The petitioner filed the suit against the respondents herein for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. The relation of the parties to the suit was not disputed. However, the respondents pleaded that the petitioner executed a relinquishment deed dated 25-5-1994, giving up her right in two items viz., land in Sy.Nos. 127/lA and 128, after receiving a sum of Rs. 50,000/-. They urged that the petitioner is not entitled for any share in the said items of property.3. The trial Court framed necessary issues, and the trial of the suit commenced. The evidence on behalf of the petitioner was closed. During the course of evidence, on behalf of the respondents herein, t...
Ravuri Lakshminarasimha Rao Vs. Amudalapalli Nageshwara Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD291
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. This is an appeal by the fourth defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by Respondents 1 and 2 against Respondents 3 to 5 and the appellant.2. For the sake of convenience, parties to the appeal would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.3. The case, in brief, of the plaintiffs is, Defendants 1 to 3 who are the owners of the plaint schedule property, had on 19-6-1980 entered into an agreement to sell the same to them and received Rs. 11,000/-as advance and put them in possession thereof. Since Item No. 3 of the plaint schedule at that time was un-reclaimed waste, they spent more than Rs. 1,000/- and brought it also under cultivation. Though they are always ready and willing to perform their part of contract, Defendants 1 to 3 failed to get the land measured and receive the balance sale consideration and execute the sale deed. Shortly after the said agreement, 4th defendant filed O.S. No. 318 of 1980 on the file of the Additio...
A.P. Civil Supplies Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Delta Oils and Facts Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2006
Reported in: [2007]73SCL242(AP)
S. Ananda Reddy, J.1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful petitioner before the Company Law Board, viz., A.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation, by which an application filed by the appellant under Section 235(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), seeking direction to the Central Government for appointment of Inspectors to investigate into the affairs of the 1 st respondent-company during the tenure period of the 2nd respondent as Managing Director of the said Company, was dismissed.2. It is stated that the 1st respondent was formed as a joint venture company between the appellant Corporation and the respondents 2 to 4, who were the Managing Director and the Directors of the Company in question, having contributed equally by the appellant and the respondents to the share capital of the Company and the said Company was run by the 2nd respondent as Managing Director, by looking after day-to-day affairs of the Company. Though the Company did well from i...
i.B. Rao Vs. Registrar of Companies
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2006
Reported in: [2007]77SCL182(AP)
B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. In these three criminal petitions, the petitioner is one and the same and the issue involved is also one and the same. Therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The petitioner is A1 in C.C. Nos. 297, 298 and 299 of 2002, on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad.3. The facts of the case, in brief, are:M/s. Royce Marine Products Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956.I.B. Rao (petitioner in these petitions), Y. Ratnagiri Rao, D. Nageswara Prasad and P.V. Rao are directors/officers of M/s. Royce Marine Products Ltd. The company came out with a public issue of 59,50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each for cash at par aggregating to the tune of Rs. 5,95,00,000 by issuing a prospectus dated 26-7-1994. The said prospectus was registered in the office of the Registrar of Companies (complainant) on 4-8-1994. It was stated in the prospectus that the company was proposing to acquir...
Mir Mujahid Ali Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD438
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard the Counsel on record.2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to receive the application of the petitioner seeking permission for construction of building in Plot No. 8-2-602/A, Zehra Nagar, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad without insisting on production of No Objection Certificate from the District Collector, Hyderabad District and the clearance from Urban Land Ceiling Authorities and pass such other or further orders.3. It is stated that suitable directions had been issued in a similar writ petition in W.P. No. 18761 of 2005 by order dated 24-8-2005. It is stated by the petitioner that the petitioner had purchased a house bearing Municipal No. 8-2-602/A, Zehra Nagar, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad under a registered sale deed dated 9-3-1996. Several other details also had been furnished. It is further stated that the petitioner made an application to the respondents-Corporation for permitting him to de...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. S. Surya Prakash Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2006
Reported in: I(2007)ACC361; 2006ACJ2287; 2006(4)ALD530
G.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. In furtherance of order dated 20-8-2004 passed by the Full Bench, LPA (SR) No. 87377 of 2003 has been placed before the Larger Bench for determination of the following question of law:Whether, after insertion of amended Section 100A in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'the Code') by Act No. 22 of 2002, Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against the judgment rendered by a Single Judge in an appeal arising out of a special enactment 2. The background in which the aforementioned question has been referred to the Larger Bench deserves to be noticed first.3. By an award dated 1-10-1996, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi directed M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited to pay compensation of Rs. 90,000/-with interest @ 12% per annum to Sri 5. Surya Prakash Reddy in lieu of the death of his wife Rukmini caused in an accident which took place on 31-5-1991 on Tirupathi - Chandragiri Road. The appeal preferred by M/...
Varanasi Jagadeeswara Prasad Vs. Jaggaiahpet Municiplity
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD768
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard the Counsel.2. W.V.M.P.No. 13/2006 is filed by Jaggaiahpet Municipality, represented by its Commissioner, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District-respondent in Writ Petition No. 24830/2005 to vacate the interim orders in W.P.M.P. No. 31914/2005 dated 22-11-2005.3. Both the Counsel made elaborate submissions and hence the main writ petition itself is being disposed of at this stage.4. Sri Satyam Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner would maintain that the rejection of the application praying for the co-option member cannot be sustained since the petitioner satisfies the qualifications specified in Rule 3(e) of the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Councils/Nagar Panchayats (Co-option of Members having Special Knowledge or Experience in Municipal Administration) Rules, 1995.5. Sri Nageswar Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel representing the Municipality in question however would submit that no acceptable material as such had been placed to satisfy that...
Nidamanuri Remana Kumari and anr. Vs. Erukula Sesha Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2006
Reported in: IV(2006)ACC173; 2006(4)ALD689; 2006(4)ALT638
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The parents of a girl, by name Nidamanuri Amitha, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 27-10-1999, near Nagarjuna Sagar Right Canal at Kambampadu village of Macherla Mandal, Guntur District, filed this appeal, Under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking enhancement of the compensation.2.The appellants filed M.V.O.P. NO. 283 of 2000, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Guntur, claiming a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/-, as compensation, for the death of their daughter. They pleaded that when the 2nd appellant and the deceased were travelling in a jeep bearing NO. AP-7W-2157, to visit Amaralihgeswara Swamy Temple at Dyda, the jeep fell into the Nagarjuna Sagar Right Canal when the driver lost his control. His daughter was said to have been washed away in the waters and that the dead body was traced in the Buggavagu Reservoir, 3 or 4 days after the accident.3. The appellants pleaded that the deceased was studying B.Com. Degre...
S. Mallikarjuna Rao Vs. Government of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALD267; 2006(6)ALT730
B. Prakash Rao, J.1. Heard Sri Ghanta Rama Rao, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services II appearing on behalf of the respondent.2. The petitioner, who is an employee working as Senior Assistant with the respondent, files this writ petition, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari in rejecting his application as per the order dated 22.11.2005 in O.A.No. 6959 of 2005 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad ('the Tribunal' for brevity), inter alia, seeking for allotment of quarter to him and also assailing the impugned Memo No. 21607/ Accom.B2/2005-2 dated 1.7.2005 rejecting such request. Without going into merits, the Tribunal dismissed the same following the judgment reported in Union of India v. Sh. Rasila Ram and Ors. 2002 (4) ALD 57 (SC), on the ground that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction with regard to the allotment of the Government quarter and other related matters.3. Having heard the submissio...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »