Andhra Pradesh Court April 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nalluri Singaiah Vs. Bandlapati Kishore Babu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD347
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Respondent filed the suit against the revision petitioner with deficit Court fee and an application seeking time for payment of Court fee. The trial Court granted 20 days time for payment of Court fee. Respondent filed another application seeking further extension of time in which the trial Court extended time for payment by 10 more days. On an application seeking further extension of time, trial Court granted 15 more days time. Thereafter, respondent presented the plaint with a delay of 146 days along with an application to condone delay, after complying all the objections which was allowed by the trial Court and the suit was registered. After the revision petitioner put in appearance in the suit he filed a petition under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint, on the ground application for extension of time for payment of deficit Court fees was not filed within time for the 2nd time and application for condonation of delay of 146 days filed by he...
Ramesh Agencies, Guntur Rep. by Sole Proprietorix. Smt. P. Anasuyadevi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALT355; 2007(2)CTLJ127(AP)
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 153 of 1987 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Guntur, had preferred this appeal and inasmuch as the appellant died, her legal representatives were brought on record in CMP No. 3337 of 2001, dated 31 -3-2001, and at present they are prosecuting the present litigation. The respondent in the appeal, the defendant in the suit, is Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Oil Seeds Growers Federation Limited, a Co-operative concern. The parties hereinafter would be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendant for the purpose of convenience.2. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit for recovery of Rs. 82,080/- towards damages with subsequent interest and also for costs of the suit. The defendant resisted the said suit. The learned Judge recorded the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, D.W.1 and also marked Exs.A-1 to A-18 and Exs.B-1 to B-5 and ultimately came to the conclusion that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief prayed for and dismi...
D.V. Muralikrishna Rao Vs. Ch. Gopala Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD788
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The respondent filed O.S. No. 18 of 2003 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bobbili, against the petitioner, for the relief of recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,20,000/-, on the strength of a pronote. The petitioner opposed the suit, by denying his liability. The trial of the suit commenced and the recording of evidence on behalf of the respondent is said to have been concluded. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A. No. 133 of 2005 under Order XIII Rule 2 CPC, with a prayer to permit him to file certified copy of a letter, said to have been issued to him by the son of the respondent herein. It was pleaded that the said letter is the certified copy of Ex.B. 1 in O.S.No. 77 of 2003 filed by the son of the respondent herein against the petitioner. Through order, dated 12-4-2005, the trial Court rejected the I.A. Hence, this civil revision petition.2. Sri Kuriti Bhaskara Rao, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the reasons assigned by the trial C...
Md. Mahmood and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3470
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 677 of 2002 on the file of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, for the offence under Section 7(iv) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.2. The brief facts of the case are that based on the complaint lodged by one Syed Sadiq, Head Constable of Amberpet Police Station, alleging that on 14-5-2002 at 10.30 hours while he and another Constable were on patrolling duty, they found the petitioners selling Gutkha, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Amberpet Police Station, registered a case in Crime No. 148 of 2002 and after investigation, he filed charge-sheet against the petitioners for the offence under Section 7(iv) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, which was taken on file as C.C. No. 677 of 2002, and to quash the said proceedings, the petitioners filed this criminal petition.3. The learned Counsel for the p...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. C. Giramma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-2006
Reported in: 2007ACJ636
G. Chandraiah, J.1. Aggrieved by the award and decree dated 10.4.2001, the insurance company filed the appeal.2. The brief facts as stated in the claim petition are that the deceased was hale and healthy, was an expert carpenter earning an amount of Rs. 3,000 and he was also a hamali. On 31.10.1995 at about 2.45 p.m. when the deceased and his brother were travelling in the lorry bearing No. AP 02-V 2195 as hamalies along with the wooden frames from Rasimpalli to Kothecheruvu, the driver of the lorry drove the vehicle in high speed, in a rash and negligent manner, took sudden turn, applied sudden brakes to give side to pass opposite D.B. cart and as a result, the deceased who was sitting in the cabin fell on the ground due to jerk and rear wheel of lorry ran over the deceased and he received grievous and multiple fractures on both legs. The deceased was taken to hospital in van and he died on the way to hospital. A case was registered by Bukkapatnam Police Station in Cr. No. 41 of 1995 ...
Kyatham Yadagiri and ors. Vs. Secretary to Government Energy (Power-i) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)ALD403; 2006(4)ALT268
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, in its Energy Department, intended to acquire an extent of Ac. 197-00 of land, in Bhupalpally Village of Warangal District, for the benefit of Singareni Collieries, the 4th respondent herein. The requisition made by the 4th respondent, through their letter dated 23.9.1993, was acted upon by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mulug, the 3rd respondent herein, and he submitted his proposal, dated 25.1.1995, to the District Collector, the 2nd respondent herein. The 1st respondent accorded necessary permission, way back on 6.9.1996, for publication of the notifications under Sections 4(1) and 6 of Land Acquisition Act (for short 'the Act'). A notification under Section 4(1) was published on 12.2.1998, in respect of various extents of land, including the land in Sy. No. 325/1. On the next day itself, a notification under Section 6 of the Act was published. 2. Petitioners state that they have purchased small plots in Sy. No. 325/1...
Goparaju Venkata Satya Suryanarayana Vs. Tallapragada Naga Venkata Sur ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2006
Reported in: AIR2006AP278; 2006(4)ALD98; 2006(3)ALT694
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner in the C.P.P. is the defendant in O.S.No.149 of 1999, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothapet. The suit was filed by the respondent, for recovery of certain amount. It was decreed on 20-8-2004. After the decree became final, the respondent filed E.P.63 of 2004, under Order XXI Rule 37 C.P.C. The executing Court issued notice to the petitioner, requiring him to appear before it on 20-1 -2005.2. Petitioner filed Vakalat and counter affidavit on 20-1-2005. On the same day, the respondent filed E.A.No.325 of 2005, under Sub-rule (2) of Rule 37 of Order XXI C.P.C., stating that the petitioner did not appear in person, before the executing court, in response to the notice issued to him, and in that view of the matter, he must be arrested. The trial court allowed the E.A., and issued warrant of arrest against the petitioner, through an order passed on the same day. The petitioner challenges the said order.3. Sri V.LN.G.K. Murthy, ...
B. Devadanam Vs. Hon'ble Labour Court Iii, rep. by Its Presiding Offic ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD113; 2006(3)ALT623; [2006(110)FLR453]
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. The award dated 06-04-1999, passed by Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, in I.D. No. 44 of 1996, is called in question in this writ petition.2. The petitioner was appointed as Conductor in 1979 with respondent No. 2-APSRTC. On 17-12-1993, while he was conducting the bus service on the route Haliya to Miryalaguda, a check was exercised, and for certain irregularities, he was issued a charge memo. Thereupon, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner on 23-12-1993. The petitioner submitted his explanation to the charges. Thereafter, an enquiry was conducted into the charges. The Enquiry Officer having conducted the enquiry, held the charges proved. Based on the findings of the enquiry report, a notice dated 07-06-1994 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why he shall not be removed from service was issued to the petitioner. Upon considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner there to, vide order dated 29-06-1994, the petitioner was ordered to be remo...
i.V. Saibaba Reddy Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD87; 2006(4)ALT226
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is allegedly owner of agricultural land admeasuring Acs.2.531/2 in Survey Nos. 1097 and 1098 situated in Nellore Bit-II. It appears, the second respondent approached the Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), Nellore for issue of pattadar passbooks based on agreement of sale. The same was decided by the MRO in favour of the second respondent. Alleging that the agreement of sale based on which the second respondent claimed title and occupation, is a forged document and also for other grounds, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent herein on 13.6.2005. The same is kept pending. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to enquiry into the matter and send the document to the Director of Forensic Science Laboratory, and dispose of the appeal expeditiously.2. Heard the learned Counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General).3. Learne...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Islavath Chinnamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2006
Reported in: IV(2006)ACC843; 2007ACJ1529; 2006(4)ALD268; 2006(4)ALT698
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The order dated 28-12-2004, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar, in O.P. No. 661 of 1998, is challenged by the 2nd respondent therein.2. 1st respondent is the wife, respondents 2 to 6 are children and respondents 7 and 8 are the parents of late Doriya. He was the owner-cum-driver of a vehicle, bearing No. AAB-338, which was used in transporting bricks and sand, to Hyderabad.3. On 20-5-1998, the lorry driven by late Doriya reached the cross roads at Aramghar. At that time, a lorry bearing No. AP-11T-5423, owned by the 9th respondent and insured with the appellant, came and collided with other lorry. Doriya is said to have died due to the injuries, after he was shifted to Osmania Hospital. Crime No. 193 of 1998 was registered. The respondents 1 to 8 claimed a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- as compensation, under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short 'the Act'). It was alleged that the deceased was ear...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »