Andhra Pradesh Court April 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kata Arogyaiah and ors. Vs. Chippa Pentamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD157; 2006(3)ALT700
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. In all these civil revision petitions filed under Section 91 of A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (the Tenancy Act, for brevity), the petitioners and the respondents are same. By common order, dated 30-4-2005 in case No.F2/5767/ 2004 and case No.F2/6916/2004, the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District allowed the appeals filed by respondents and remanded the matters to the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Ranga Reddy (East Division) for de novo enquiry. By the said order, the Joint Collector set aside the orders passed by RDO, dated 31-05-2004. Aggrieved by this order, C.R.P.No.2755 and 2774 of 2005 are filed. By yet another common order, dated 30-04-2005, the Joint Collector allowed appeals in case No.F2/5768/2004 and in case No.F2/6917/2004, while setting aside the Panchanama, dated 30-01-2003, and remanded the matter to Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), Saroor Nagar for passing appropriate orders. This common order is subject matter of ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Boya Siva Kumar and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2006
Reported in: III(2006)ACC724; 2007ACJ1315; 2006(4)ALD273; 2006(4)ALT650
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The 1st respondent filed M.V.O.P. No. 931 of 2002 before the IV Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kumool, claiming a sum of Rs. 50,000/- as compensation, for the injuries sustained by him, in a road accident. It was pleaded that on 8-5-2002 at 10:00 am, the 1st respondent and his cousin were returning from their house from the fields, at Valkur Village, and a vehicle bearing No. TN-02-F-4736 came in a rash and negligent manner from Mantralayam side and dashed against him. The vehicle is owned by the 2nd respondent and insured with the appellant. The 1st respondent narrated the nature of injuries as well as treatment received by him. The owner of the vehicle, the 2nd respondent, remained ex parte. The appellant pleaded that though a policy was taken for the vehicle in question, it became inoperative, because of the reason that the cheque, issued by the 2nd respondent for payment of the premium, was dishonoured. It was further alleged ...
Kavitapu Devi Kiranmayi and ors. Vs. Kavitapu Suryakantham and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD467
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed by three minors, represented by their maternal uncle. They are defendant Nos. 2 to 4 in O.S.No. 165 of 2002 filed by the first respondent herein, in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram. The first respondent is the mother of the father of appellants, by name Vijaya Krishna. He is said to have died in the year 2000 and much before that, his father died. The appellants were under the care and custody of their mother, by name Padmavathi, who is no more now. Respondents 3 and 4 are the daughter of the first respondent. Respondents 5, 6 and 7 are said to be the tenants.2. The first respondent filed the suit for partition of the suit schedule properties and allotment of one-third share to her. She pleaded that after the death of her husband, the properties were being managed by her son Vijaya Krishna, and after his death, her daughter-in-law, by name Padmavathi, was looking after them. She pleaded that despite her...
Fizikem Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Drugs Inspector and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3090
ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. The principal question to be decided in this batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') is with regard to the jurisdiction of the Drug Inspector appointed under Section 21 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (for short 'the Act') to launch prosecution under Section 32 for the alleged offences said to have been committed under the Act in connection with the manufacture and sale of Ayurvedic drugs Ozomen capsules and Ozomen Forte.2. As these petitions raise a point of some significance in relation to the proper construction and Interaction of Sections 33A, 33B, 33EEC, 33G, 33M of the Act. Therefore, they are extracted hereunder:33-A Chapter not to apply to Ayurvedic, Siddha or Unani drugs : Save as otherwise provided in this Act, nothing contained in this Chapter shall apply to 'Ayurvedic (including Siddha) or Unani'.33-B Application of Chapter IV-A:This Chapter shall apply only to Ayurvedic, Sid...
Thora Ratna Devi Vs. Chikkam Sri Venkata Atchutha Chandra Mohan
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALT591
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. They are closely related even before the marriage, which took place in the year 2003. However, on account of differences between them, they are living separately. The respondent filed O.P. No. 11 of 2006 in the Family Court, Visakhapatnam against the petitioner, for divorce. The petitioner seeks transfer of the O.P. to the Family Court, Hyderabad. She contends that ever since she was deserted by the respondent, she has been living with her parents at Hyderabad. She pleads that it would be difficult and unsafe for her to travel to Visakhapatnam to defend herself in the case.2. The respondent filed a counter-affidavit. He states that he is an unemployee and he is under going treatment for psychiatric disorders. He contends that it would be difficult for him to travel to Hyderabad in case the O.P. is transferred.3. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent.4. The marri...
Sridhar Paints Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2006
Reported in: 2007(208)ELT18(AP); [2007]8STJ406(AP); 2008[11]STR88
ORDER1. Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed in support of the Petition, the High Court will have pleased to stay all the further proceedings by the Respondent pursuant to the remand order made by the CEGAT in 1342 to 1346 of 2004 dated 30-11-05 pending disposal of the C.E.A. No. 2/06 on the file of the High Court.2. The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the argument of Sri A. Mahadev, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri A. Rajashekar Reddy, SC for Central Government for the Respondents.3. Since the question of maintainability of the Appeal itself is questioned by the Respondent, therefore at this stage no stay can be granted, C.E.A.M.P. is therefore dismissed....
C. Venkataiah Vs. District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-13-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD17; 2006(3)ALT735
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed assailing the action of the respondents in proposing to acquire the lands belonging to Sri Anjaneya Swamy Temple at Gotlur, Dharmavaram Mandal of Anantapur District. The petitioner states that he is an ardent devotee of the temple. According to him, there is no independent source of income, for the maintenance of the temple, and that an extent of Ac.9.45 cents in Sy.No. 63, endowed to it; was being leased out after deliberations among the village elders, Trust Board members etc. He submits that the entire land belonging to the temple is sought to be acquired for the purpose of providing house sites, and no opportunity was given, either to the villagers or to the interested persons, to put forward their contentions. It is urged that the petitioner and other devotees came to know about the notifications issued under Section 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short 'the Act') on 20-02-1996, only when they were published on 24-0...
United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. K. Chandrasekharachari and anr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-13-2006
Reported in: I(2007)ACC308; 2008ACJ640; 2006(4)ALD474
G. Chandraiah, J.1. Heard both the Counsel.2. Aggrieved by the award dated 28-2-2002 passed by the Court of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Anantapur, the United India Insurance Company, which is the insurer of the lorry involved in the accident, filed this appeal.3. The brief facts of the case are that on 6-7-1994 at about 5 p.m., van bearing No. AP02-T-5945, belonging to the claimant was parked by the side of a tea hotel of one Ramachandra, on the national high way No. 7. At about 5.45 p.m., a lorry bearing No.TN/36-5896 came from Penukonda side, allegedly with a high speed in a rash and jig jag manner and dashed the tea hotel and ran through the hotel and dashed the van of the claimant and as a result, the van dashed the tamarind tree and got damaged. It is stated that in the accident two persons died and six others were injured and a case in Crime No. 26/1995 of Chennakothapalli Police Station was registered under Sections 337, 338 and 304A of I.P.C. Alleging that the claimant was...
L. Hassan Khan and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-12-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)ALT179
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. As the writ petitions and contempt case arise in the background of facts, which is similar, they are being disposed of by this common order. The fact of the matter, which is general to all the writ petitions and contempt case, may be noticed in brief.2. The land in survey No. 480 in Dhone Village of Dhone Mandal in Kurnool District was purchased by late Mahaboob Khan under registered sale deed dated 15-8-1919. He was enjoying the property along with his three sons Hasan Khan, Abdur Rahaman Khan and late Noor Khan. After death of Mahaboob Khan, statedly, there was a partition of the properties among the three sons under registered partition deed dated 9-7-1958. Hasan Khan got Acs.9.09, Abdur Rahman Khan got Acs.8.86 and an extent of Acs.8.00 fell to the share of Noor Khan. State acquired about Acs.1.06 belonging to Hasan Khan, Acs.1.14 belonging to Abdur Rahman Khan and Acs.2.63 belonging to Noor Khan, (total extent of Acs.4.83) for laying a bypass road for N. H .7...
Kamisetty Narayana Murthy Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-12-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD170; 2006(4)ALT222
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is Upa Sarpanch of Padala Gram Panchayat of Tadepalligudem Mandal in West Godavari District. He filed the instant writ petition seeking invalidation of the action initiated by the first respondent in scheduling the meeting on 11.8.2005 to consider motion of no confidence moved by the members of the Gram Panchayat. This Court while admitting the writ petition, stayed the announcement of the result by reason of the orders passed on 9.8.2005. The respondents 2 to 9 moved W.V.M.P. No. 2386 of 2005 to vacate the interim order. At that stage itself, with the consent of the learned Counsel for rival parties, the matter was heard finally and is being disposed of by this order.2. The petitioner was elected as member of Gram Panchayat along with nine others in 2001. Later, he was elected as Upa Sarpanch of the village. On 22.6.2005, respondents 2 to 9, who are the ward members of the Gram Panchayat, issued a notice of their intention to move motion expressing...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »