Andhra Pradesh Court February 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D. Veera Naga Kumari Vs. District Collector (Panchayat Wing) and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-2006
Reported in: 2006(3)ALT269
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Tarakatur Gram Panchayat of Gudur Mandal in Krishna District in August 2001. On certain allegations that he committed acts of malfeasance and misfeasance in drawing and spending panchayat funds, the first respondent by an order dated 02-8-2005 suspended the petitioner for a period of three months as per Section 249(6) of the A. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (the Act, for brevity). This order is assailed in the writ petition, after expiry of period of three months for which the suspension was to be in force. It is contended that the impugned order is issued without providing any opportunity to give reply to the show cause notice. It is also contended that the first respondent came to the conclusion that the allegations are proved and if the said observation is allowed, the firsrt respondent may even pass orders under Section 249(1) of the Act for removal, without following the procedure.2. At the stage of admission itself, the...
Makemalla Sailoo Vs. Superintendent of Police and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)ALD290; 2006(2)ALT383; II(2006)DMC4
Bilal Nazki, J. WP No. 23910 of 2005:1. This is an unusual case in which a girl of 13 years claims to have married 3rd respondent. The petitioner is the father of the girl viz., Arpitha who was a student of 7th class. He contended in this writ petition that while he was sleeping out side his residence, on 26.4.2005, the 3rd respondent took away his minor daughter, then he lodged a complaint with the police. The complaint was registered on 4.6.2005 as Cr.No. 116 of 2005 under Section 366 read with Section 109 IPC. The police could not trace out the girl. Therefore the writ petiton was filed on 7.11.2005. According to certificate, her date of birth is 12.9.1993.2. Counter-affidavit was filed by 2nd respondent in which it is admitted that the report had been filed. It is stated that on 11.11.2005 the police got information that the alleged detenue and the accused were staying in Chennai. A police team went there and traced the alleged detenue and the accused. Their statements were recorde...
M. Ramachandra Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)ALD296
ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. Heard both sides and perused the material on record.2. The petitioners claim to be the members of the third respondent-Sri Venkateswara Co-operative House Building Society for A.P. Legislators Limited. It is stated that since no elections were conducted to the Managing Committee for the past many years, Persons-in-charge were being appointed by the Government from time to time. In pursuance of the repeated requests made by the members of the society, ultimately the respondent authorities decided to hold elections and accordingly vide proceedings dated 23-12-2004 the District Collector, who is the Election Authority has appointed the 2nd respondent - The Deputy Registrar as Election Officer. In pursuance thereof, the 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 3-2-2005 announced the election programme, according to which the election date was fixed as 22-2-2005. However, the 1st respondent-Government of A.P. vide Memo dated 11-2-2005 stayed the elections scheduled and the...
M. Laxmi Bai and ors. Vs. Neelam Narsimha and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)ALD74; 2006(2)ALT391
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. Since the questions of law and facts involved in these two writ petitions are common, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. W.P. No.21256 of 2003 is filed against the order dated 18-2-2002 passed by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad, in case No.D5/7083/2000, whereby and where under the order of the Mandal Revenue Officer in file No.(B)/537/ 89 dated 7-1-1989 incorporating the names of Neelam Narsimha and his brothers Vithalaiah, Laxmaiah and Krishna in respect of Sy.Nos.40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 61, 53, 63, 64, 66, 71 admeasuring an extent of Ac. 14-14 gts. in Record of Rights register of Kothaguda village, was set aside.3. W.P. No. 1893 of 2005 is filed against the common order of the Joint Collector dated 21-12-2004 passed in Case Nos.D5/1547/1999 and D5/1237/2001, whereby and whereunder the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer passed in Case No.C/4997/1998 dated 8-2-1999 came to be set aside res...
Major B.G. Vishwas Vs. President and Correspondent, Sri Bala Siva Yoge ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)ALD432
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as Principal of Sri Bala Siva Yogendra Maharaj Degree College, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District, the first respondent. The institution was admitted to grant-in-aid. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner, by issuing a charge-sheet, dated 20-6-2005. He was placed under suspension on 23-4-2005. The management of the College appointed a retired District Judge as an Enquiry Officer, through orders, dated 18-5-2005.2. The Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Rajahmundry, passed orders, dated 15-7-2005, directing reinstatement of the petitioner on the ground that the period of two months stipulated in Section 79 of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, expired.3. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding that the charges levelled against the petitioner, are proved and the management issued a show-cause notice, dated 28-9-2005, directing the petitioner to show-cause as to why he shall not be removed fr...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›