Andhra Pradesh Court October 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. K. Andalu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2006
Reported in: 2007ACJ1807
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. One Swayam Prakash was employed as a Chainman in Hyderabad Urban Development Authority. On 11.6.1996 when he was proceeding to office along with one Ramachandra Raju on a motor cycle bearing No. AIX 4373, near E.S.I. Hospital, Hyderabad, at about 2.45 p.m., a bus bearing No. AP 9-Z 5672, owned by the appellant Corporation dashed against the motor cycle. Even while Swayam Prakash was being taken to Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad, for treatment, he died. Crime No. 283 of 1996 under Section 304-A, Indian Penal Code was registered against the driver of the bus. The wife, respondent No. 1; children, respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and mother, respondent No. 6, of the deceased filed O.P. No. 1052 of 1996 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Fifth Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad claiming a sum of Rs. 4,00,000 as compensation. The O.P. was opposed by the appellant on several grounds. Through its order dated 25.1.1999 the Tribunal awarded the claimed...
Bandarupally Rambabu and anr. Vs. M. Venkateswar Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2006
Reported in: 2007ACJ2768
G. Rohini, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 8.2.99 in M.V.O.P. No. 929 of 1996 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (First Additional District Judge), Guntur.2. The appellants are the claimants, who filed the claim petition seeking compensation of Rs. 90,000 for the death of one Suryavathi. The claimants are the son and daughter-in-law of the deceased. While the deceased was travelling in a jeep along with 12 others from Kanaparru village of Guntur District on 8.9.1996, a lorry bearing registration No. AP 16-U 918 owned by the respondent No. 1 and insured with respondent No. 2 hit the jeep resulting in death of five inmates of the jeep including deceased Suryavathi. Several claim petitions were filed by the legal representatives of the deceased as well as the persons who received injuries in the said accident and having considered the evidence produced, a finding was recorded by the Tribunal that the accident took place due to rash and negligent drivi...
Girijan Co-operative Corporation Limited Vs. Hukmichand Sachion Kumar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)ALD398
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two Transfer C.M. Ps are between the same parties and in relation to the same cause of action. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to, as arrayed in Transfer C.M.P. No. 298 of 2006.2. The petitioner is a Corporation established by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. It issued a notice, dated 5-10-2004 inviting tenders for sale of cleaning nuts of about 2500 quintals, stored at four centers. The second respondent submitted its tender for purchase of quantity at Hyderabad center and it emerged as the highest bidder, by quoting Rs. 4,500/- per quintal. The tender was accepted and the contract came into existence.3. The petitioner initiated steps for forfeiture of the E.M.D. of about Rs. 10 lakhs. The respondents filed O.S. No. 209 of 2006 in the Court of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, challenging the forfeiture. The petitioner, on the other hand, filed O.S.No.112 of 2006 in th...
Gangineni Damodar Naidu and anr. Vs. Kurapati Kondaiah Naidu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)ALD106
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Defendants in O.S. No. 12 of 1990, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, filed this second appeal, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.5.2003, rendered by the Court of IV Additional District Judge, Nellore, in A.S. No. 10 of 1999.2. The respondent filed the suit for the relief of declaration of his title over the suit schedule property, comprising of three items of agricultural lands, and for consequential injunction against the appellants herein, from interfering with his possession and enjoyment. The case of the respondent herein, as presented in the plaint, is, as under:3. Respondent, his brother-Malakondaiah Naidu, and their father Seshaiah Naidu constituted a joint family. It possessed of several items of agricultural lands, and other properties. A partition took place in the year 1980, in the presence of well-wishers and close relations. The plaint schedule property and a cattle shed, fell to the share of the respondent. About 13 acres ...
Lakkaraju Radha Krishna Vs. Pyarle Sri Rama Sarma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)ALD67; 2007(1)ALT460
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Respondents 1 and 2 filed O.S. No. 34 of 2003 in the Court of III Additional District Judge, Guntur, against respondents 3 to 5 and the petitioner herein, for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 5-5-2003 in respect of the land in R.S. Nos. 971/1 and 971/2 of Vengalanagar, Bapatla. The petitioner herein, figured as defendant No. 4 in the suit. The trial of the suit is in progress. On behalf of the petitioner, a document dated 5-5-2003 was sought to be relied upon. Initially, it was received in evidence, as Ex.B-8, subject to the objection raised by the respondents 1 and 2 (for short 'the respondents', since it is endorsed that the other respondents are not necessary). Respondents filed a revision before this Court against the said endorsement. The revision was allowed and the question, relating to the admissibility of the document, was directed to be decided, before the document was received in evidence. It was in this context, that ...
Shaik Avula Mastan @ Shaik Mastan (Died) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. Shaik Ab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)ALD793; 2007(4)ALT666
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The legal representatives of the sole defendant in O.S. No. 82 of 1993 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid, filed this second appeal. The relevant facts may, briefly, be stated as under. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to, as arrayed in the suit.2. One Mr. Shaik Moula Saheb had two sons by name, Shaik Jaffer and Shaik Mahaboob, and a daughter by name Shaik Bhanubi Plaintiffs who are the children of Shaik Jaffer, filed the suit alleging that their grandfather Moula Saheb acquired about 2 acres of agricultural land at Nuzvid {suit schedule land), and was living with his son, at Vijayawada, for most part of his life. The land was said to have been leased to his son-in-law Shaik Masthan, the sole defendant, (on whose death, his LRs were brought on record), on payment of annual maktha. It was alleged that Moula Saheb executed a registered gift deed dated 13-11-1979, donating the suit schedule property to the respondents, out of l...
V. Adeppa Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Industries and Commerce (M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2006
Reported in: 2007(5)ALT312
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner made an application to the first respondent through proper channel for grant of mining lease for quartzite for an extent of about Acs. 600.00 in survey No. 217 of Kundankota village of Yadiki Mandal in Anantapur District. The application was recommended by the second respondent. The first respondent granted mining lease by their orders in G.O.Ms. No. 248, dated 12.09.2006, subject to the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (the Act, for brevity); the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (the Rules) and subject to the conditions in the lease agreement in Form K appended to the Rules as well as additional conditions appended to the said order. The petitioner alleges that in pursuance of the grant of lease, the first respondent also approved the mining plan as required under Rule 22(4) of the Rules, which is valid for the entire duration of twenty years period and subject to such modifications that may be made by the first...
Haridasyam Srinivasa Murthy Vs. M. Janardhan Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)ALD116; 2007(3)ALT6
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. When this civil revision petition came up for admission, notice before admission was ordered on 25-7-2006 and interim stay was granted for a limited period, which is being extended.2. The civil revision petition is filed against the docket order dated 4-7-2006 made in I.A. No. 1381 of 2006 in O.S. No. 1732 of 2000 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal. The revision petitioner, 4th defendant in O.S. No. 1732 of 2000 filed an application I.A. No. 1381 of2006 in O.S. No. 1732 of 2000 praying for the relief of summoning the Advocate Commissioner by name Sri R. Venkateswar Rao who was appointed as an Advocate Commissioner in O.S. No. 1036 of 2000, which is pending before the same Court and also another Advocate Commissioner by name Sri A. Venkata Rama Narasaiah, who are practicing Advocates in Warangal Bar Association as Court witnesses.3. The learned Judge recorded certain reasons and ultimately allowed the application partly permitting the peti...
B. Subbarayudu and anr. Vs. General Manager, Sri Satyanarayana Spinnin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)ALD319; 2007(1)ALT309; [2007(113)FLR264]
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1, the learned Advocate General and the learned Government Pleader for Industries & Commerce Department, appearing for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.2. This writ petition is taken up on the basis of a representation, dated 6-5-2006, addressed to the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, by one B. Subbarayudu, s/o. Meeradasu and one V. Kanaka Raju, s/o. Butchaiah, Residents of Tanuku, West Godavari District, who are workers of Sri Satyanarayana Spinning Mills Limited, Tanuku.3. The grievance ventilated in the said representation is that the Management of the first respondent has issued a show cause notice to them on 7-3-2005 as to why their names should not be removed from the service rolls of its Attendance Register, as they could not discharge their duties due to their suffering from AIDS; that the same amounts to inhuman treatment being meted out to them and that further, th...
Thamineni Kathavanga Naidu and ors. Vs. Mutluru Ramappa (Died) and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)ALD104; 2007(4)ALT164
G.V. Seethapathy, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 9-2-1999 in O.S. No. 16 of 1992 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gooty, wherein the suit filed by the appellants-plaintiffs for declaration of title, delivery of possession of the plaint schedule property and for mesne profits, was dismissed.2. The appellants herein filed O.S. No. 16 of 1992 against the respondents herein, with the following averments:The plaintiffs are the sons of T. Ekambara Naidu. Their mother, Rangamma, is the daughter of Pedda Nagaiah. Pedda Nagaiah and his brother Chinna Nagaiah, got divided their properties. China Nagaiah died issueless leaving behind his wife Chinna Vemakka in the year 1938 or 1939. The suit schedule property belongs to Chinna Nagaiah. After his death, his widow Vemakka became entitled to the property as limited owner. The plaintiffs being the only surviving reversioners to the estate of Chinna Nagaiah, became entitled to the suit schedule property. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »