Andhra Pradesh Court July 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Srinivasa Degree College Vs. Sri Venkateswara University and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-2005
Reported in: AIR2005AP455; 2005(5)ALD427; 2005(5)ALT533
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed by Srinivasa Degree College, Kovur, Nellore District, represented by its Correspondent C. Sriram with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the condition imposed by the 1st respondent-Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupathi in its affiliation order vide ROC.No. C/III(5)/2003-04 dated 9.7.2003 directing the petitioner-College to obtain permission of A.P. State Council of Higher Education (2nd respondent) for shifting the college to the new building on or before 31.12.2003.2. The writ affidavit averments in brief are; the petitioner-College applied in the prescribed proforma under Form I of Rules 5(1) of A.P. Educational Institutions (Establishment, Recognition, Administration and Control of Institutions of Higher Education) Rules, 1987 (for brevity 'Rules, 1987') for establishment of a degree college during the year 1996. The petitioner-College was proposed to be established in an extent of Ac.2-01 cents at Kovur, Nello...
Pusapati Sudhakar Vs. Koppu Venkata Prabhakara Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: AIR2005AP386; 2005(4)ALD817; 2005(4)ALT500
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This revision raises a short, but important question of law.2. The respondent filed O.S. No. 75 of 1997, against the petitioner in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, for the relief of recovery of a sum of Rs. 92,400/-, comprising of principal of Rs. 60,000/-, and the interest at 18% per annum from 1 -8-1994 to 31-7-1997. The suit claim is based on a document dated 31-7-1994. During the course of the trial of the suit, the petitioner raised an objection, as to the admissibility of the document. According to him, it witnesses two transactions, viz., receipt of a sum of Rs. 55,000/-, under a promissory note, dated 30-6-1994, and a fresh promissory note of lending a sum of Rs. 60,000/-, and that it was not properly stamped. It was alleged that as against the stamp duty of Rs. 1/-, for receipt, and 20 paise, for promissory note, stamps worth 40 paise alone were affixed. This objection as to the admissibility was rejected by the trial Court through its or...
Gade Hanmandlu Vs. Sri Rajarajeswara Swamy Temple (Dharmasala) Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(5)ALD316; 2005(4)ALT664
L. Narsimha Reddy, J.1. The plaintiff in OS. No. 336 of 1993 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Jagtial, is the appellant. The suit filed by him, for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction was dismissed, and the counter claim filed by the 1st respondent was decreed by the trial Court, through its judgment dated 29-01-2001. A.S. No. 1 of 2001 filed by him, in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial, was also dismissed on 17-2-2004. Hence, this second appeal.2. The appellant claimed that he purchased the suit schedule property, admeasuring 2 guntas of land in Sy. No. 171, through a registered sale deed dated 14-04-1965 (Ex. A-1), from one Mr. Juwaji Pullaiah, for a consideration of Rs. 1,000/-, and that ever since then, he was in possession and enjoyment of the same. It is his case that he obtained construction permission from the Municipality, Jagtial, on 10-02-1982 (Ex. A-9); commenced construction, by raising pillars, but could not proceed with, ...
C. Kavitha Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(5)ALD333
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. This common order shall dispose of all the three writ petitions in view of the background of the cases, which are similar. Indeed W.P. Nos. 9404 and 9410 of 2004 are filed by the same petitioner. All the writ petitions are filed aggrieved by the orders of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal, for brevity) dated 28.4.2004. By reason of the impugned orders, the learned Tribunal set aside the orders of the second respondent granting variation of permit in favour of the petitioners extending the route on town service route purporting to exercise power under Sub-section (3) of Section 80 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act, for brevity).2. The fact of the matter is not much in dispute. The petitioners are existing bus operators on town service route from Kalyandurg to Bairasamudram. They were granted pucca stage carriage permits. They applied to the second respondent for variation of the route by extension of the route from Bairasamudram to Vepula...
Toddy Co-operative Society and anr. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(5)ALD331
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. These two writ petitions are filed by the Toddy Tappers Co-operative Societies. The licences issued to the petitioners-societies were suspended by the competent authority, pending further enquiry into the allegation that the petitioners adulterated toddy that was being sold in their shops. However, after obtaining the chemical analysis report of the second sample bottle, the licensing authority issued proceedings revoking the suspension order. Therefore, the petitioners approached the authority for granting remission of the monthly rentals for the period during which the licences were suspended, in vain. Therefore, they filed the present writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondent to grant remission for the period during which their shops were not allowed to be operated due to suspension orders.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners placed strong reliance on the judgment of the learned Single Judge rendered by my learned brother Justice V. Eswaraiah, in ...
Balaji Trading Company Vs. Kejriwal Paper Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)ALD(Cri)162; 2005CriLJ3805
ORDERG. Yethirajulu, J.1. This revision case is filed by the complainant in C.C. No. 904 of 2001 on the file of the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2. The respondent-accused is a company represented by its Director Sri Rahul Kejriwal. The revision petitioner-complainant is the proprietary concern and is a dealer in all kinds of paper products. In the year 2000 the respondent approached the revision petitioner for supply of waste paper. The complainant supplied waste paper on different dates under different invoices. The accused-company issued cheques for Rs. 20,00,000/- in September, 2000 towards consideration for the material supplied by the petitioner. The complainant deposited all the cheques with South India Bank Limited, Hyderabad and later he received an intimation from the bank that all the cheques issued by the accused-company in favour of the complainant were returned as dishonoured for insufficient funds. After r...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›