Andhra Pradesh Court June 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tummu Rajapu Reddy Vs. P. Koteswaramma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALT446
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The first defendant in O.S. No. 23 of 2004 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur, Medak District is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. Respondents 1 to 4 herein filed the suit with a prayer to set aside the preliminary decree passed in O.S. No. 77 of 2000 on the file of the same Court as well as the final decree passed therein. They also filed I.A. No. 84 of 2004 under Order 39 Rule 1 C.P.C. against the petitioner and eight others. Through its order dated 09-11 -2004, the trial Court granted temporary injunction. The petitioner assailed the same by filing C.M.A. No. 7 of 2004 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Medak. The CM.A. was dismissed on 15-02-2005. Hence, this civil revision petition.2. The relevant facts are as under:The petitioner, respondents 5 to 7 and one Mr. Thummu Chalamareddy are the sons of Thummu Marrireddy of Reddypalem, Hamlet of Chintalacheruvu Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Medak District. Thummu Marrireddy owned an ex...
Syed Azmath Ali and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALD550
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. In these Writ Petitions Notice Before Admission had been ordered and pending further orders status quo had been directed to be maintained.2. Heard Sri Syed Shareef Ahmed, Counsel representing the writ petitioners and Sri A.M. Qureshi, Counsel representing the A.P. Wakf Board. In view of the fact that common questions are involved in both the writ petitions, these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.3. These writ petitions are filed questioning the letter bearing No. M1/51/ KNR/PROT/04 dated 5-10-2004 addressed by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent and for such other suitable reliefs. The said letter dated 5-10-2004 addressed to the District Revenue Officer and District Wakf Officer, Karimnagar reads as hereunder :ANDHRA PRADESH STATE WAKFBOARDHaj House Building,Nampally, HyderabadNo. M1/51/KNR/Prot/2004Dated: 5-10-2004FromThe Chief Executive Officer,A.P. State Wakf Board,Hyderabad.ToThe Dist. Revenue Officer andDistrict Wakf Officer,Kar...
N. Mallamma Vs. Superintendent Engineer, Operation Assessment, A.P. Tr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2005
Reported in: AIR2005AP442; 2005(5)ALD82
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Damodar Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner and the Standing Counsel for A.P. TRANSCO.2. The writ petitioner filed the present writ petition praying for an order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing initial assessment notice- to the petitioner vide Lr. No. ADE/D-III/838 dated 12-9-2003 though the petitioner is not in possession and enjoyment of H. No. 13-1-13/2/3 at Mangalhat, Hyderabad and further to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not causing detailed enquiry on the representation of the petitioner as against the above initial assessment notice as illegal, unlawful, contrary to law and against principles of natural justice and consequently directing the respondents to cause a detailed enquiry in the matter and till completion of such enquiry the initial assessment notice may not be given effect and to pass such other suitable orders....
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›