Andhra Pradesh Court February 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Dasaratharamaiah Vs. State, Inspector of Police, Cid Pcr Cell
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-04-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD(Cri)249; 2005CriLJ3771
ORDERA. Gopal, Reddy, J.1. All these revisions are filed by the accused against the dismissal of petitions filed by them under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to discharge them from the charges for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 182, IPC read with Sections 10 and 11 of A. P. (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (for short 'the Act').2. The facts in nutshell are as under :L.W. 1-Bathala Madhava Rao, filed a petition alleging that petitioners have secured employment in New India Assurance Company Limited in the vacancies reserved for Scheduled Caste by showing bogus caste certificate. The same was enquired into by L.W. 13 and who after enquiry submitted his report to the Additional Director General of Police, CID, Hyderabad. Basing on the said complaint a crime was registered under Sections 420, 182, IPC and Sections 10 and 11 of the Act, and after due enquiry necessary charge-sheet was fi...
Dasari Suryachander Rao and ors. Vs. Mandal Revenue Officer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-03-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)ALD482
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Dasari Suryachander Rao and others filed the present writ petition to call for the records relating to Case No. 13/687/87 on the file of 3rd respondent confirming the orders of 2nd respondent made in A.P.No. 369/77 and 4th respondent made in Case No. 2858 and issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the order of the 3rd respondent made in Case No. 13/687/87 confirming the orders of the 2nd respondent made in A.P. No. 369/77 and the 4th respondent made in Case No. 2858 and to pass such other suitable orders.2. Sri Srinivas Rao, representing Lakshmana Sarma, the learned Counsel for the writ petitioners made the following submissions. The learned Counsel at the outset had drawn the attention of this Court to a decision of this Court in Kakarala Nageswara Rao v. Government of A.P. and Ors., : 1995(3)ALT164 and had explained that in the light of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decision the very order of the Primary A...
Srinivasa Fertilizers Vs. Mandal Revenue Officer, Ravulapalem Mandal
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-03-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)ALD626
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. A.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited, 2nd respondent, in the present writ petition, in short referred to as 'Corporation' moved W.V.M.P. No. 3625/2004 in W.P.M.P. No. 23677/1997 praying for vacation of the interim direction dated 19-8-1997 and at the time of hearing of the vacate application, with the consent of the Counsel on record, the writ petition itself is being finally disposed of.2. Sri P. Rajam Raju, Counsel representing the writ petitioner after taking this Court through the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition maintained that in view of the fact that a decree had been obtained in O.S. No. 153/87 on the file of I Additional Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari for recovery of amount, the same can be put into execution by the 2nd respondent-Corporation and hence the impugned proceeding of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Ravulapalem Mandal, East Godavari District, 1st respondent herein, in Reference C.No. 242...
G. Srinivas Rao Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its Secretary to Gove ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-03-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALD275; 2005(2)ALT728
ORDER1. Heard Sri Nooty Rama Mohana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V. T. Gopalan, Additional Solicitor General for India instructed by Sri B. Narasimha Sharma, learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent, the learned Government Pleader for Services-l for the 2nd respondent and Sri Madhav Pannikar, Advocate for Sri Bhaskar Poluri for the 4th respondent.2. The substantive grievance of the petitioner is as regards his allocation to the Manipur-Tripura Joint Cadre of the Indian Police Service. Urging the said grievance, in particular on the ground that his allocation to the Manipur-Tripura Joint Cadre while allocating the 4th respondent to the AP Cadre is illegal, the petitioner filed OA No. 155 of 2001 before the Hyderabad Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). By the order dated 9-1-2004 the OA was dismissed. The said order is assailed in this writ petition.CHRONOLOGY OF FACTS, IN BRIEF:-(A) The petitioner and the 4th responden...
Korivi Mallaiah (Died) by Lrs. Vs. P. Narender and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-2005
Reported in: AIR2005AP251; 2005(2)ALD831; 2005(2)ALT649
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Deceased first revision petitioner i.e., husband of second revision petitioner and father of third revision petitioner, filed O.S. No.101 of 1993 seeking a decree of perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy. No. 1119 of Karimnagar Town, which was decreed. Alleging that Respondents 1 and 2, in violation of the said Orders of injunction, had constructed a compound wall and a shed in the property covered by the aforesaid O.S. No.101 of 1993, Revision Petitioners 2 and 3, after the death of the first revision petitioner, filed E.P. No.42 of 2000 for removal of those constructions alleging as follows:'The Judgment Debtors 1 and 2 have illegally and in violation of the decree in O.S. No.101 of .1993 have constructed compound wall and one shed in the schedule property forming part of Plot No. 13 during the year 1996. Likewise, the Judgment Debtors Nos.4 to 6 have constructed shed i...
V. Venkataswamy Vs. Convener, Edcet-2004 and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)ALD882
ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. The petitioner is an engineering graduate, having obtained a Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University in the year 2002. He states that in pursuance of a notification issued by the Government of A.P. proposing to conduct Education Common Entrance Test (EDCET) 2004 relating to B.Ed. Regular Course on 6-8-2004, he submitted his application after completing all the formalities on 27-8-2004, well within the time prescribed. However, on 8-9-2004 the petitioner was intimated by the office of the 1st respondent - Convener, EDCET that his application was rejected since B. Tech. candidates are not eligible. The next day when the petitioner visited the office of the 1st respondent to make further enquiry, his application form itself was returned reiterating that B. Tech. candidates are not eligible for EDCET-2004. Aggrieved by the said action of the 1st respondent, this writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the actio...
P. Usha Rani Vs. District Collector and District Magistrate and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)ALT416
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Petitioner made an application to the 2nd respondent - Mandal Revenue Officer, Armoor for issuance of a Caste Certificate. The Caste Certificate was issued with her maiden surname, describing her as the daughter of Narsimlu, but not as the wife of Bojanna as sought by her in her application. Therefore, she made an application to the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer to change her surname and include the name of her husband in place of her father's name in the paste certificate, to enable her to contest the ensuing Panchayat Elections. Since that application was not considered on the ground that as per the existing system, the caste certificate will have to be issued to the applicant, with original surname; she would have to follow the procedure prescribed in G. O. Ms. (P) No. 819 General Administration (General-C) Department, dated 8-12-1977 for change of her name in the caste certificate.2. When the writ petition came up for admission, the learned Judge ...
Director of Intermediate Education Vs. T. Satyam Naidu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)ALD124
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Satyanarayana Prasad, the learned Senior Counsel, the learned Government Pleader for Services-I and also Sri P.S. Rajasekhar, Counsel representing Respondents 1 to 3 in the present Writ Petition, applicants in O.A. No. 4001/96.2. Respondents 1 to 3 herein/applicants in O.A. No. 4001/96 filed the said O.A. on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal, hereinafter in short referred to as 'Tribunal' for the purpose of convenience, to call for records relating to proceedings Memo No. 1609/HE.2/93-5 dated 17-6-1996 of the 1st respondent in the O.A. and to quash the same and direct the Respondents in the O.A. to revise the pay scales of the applicants therein in accordance with 1986 and 1993 Revised Pay Scales and also to direct the Respondents to continue the applicants as Attenders and pay Rs. 1375-2525. The matter was disposed of by the Tribunal holding that the impugned Memo dated 17-6-1996 cannot be sustained and the applicants' pay have to be fixed as per r...
Senior Deputy Director General (Electrical) and ors. Vs. M. Subbarao a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)ALT340; (2005)IIILLJ232AP
T. Meena Kumari, J.1. This writ appeal is filed by the Bharatiya Sanchara Nigam Limited-appellant herein aggrieved by the common order in W.P. Nos. 10779, 10885, 10886, 10901 and 9758 of 2004, dated 14-10-2004, under which the learned single Judge allowed the writ petitions to the extent indicated therein.2. In all these appeals, since the parties are one and the same and issue involved is identical, they are disposed of by a common judgment.3. The B.S.N.L. authorities are the appellants herein. The respondents in the respective writ appeals are the writ petitioners. They filed the writ petitions seeking a writ of mandamus by declaring that the action of the appellants in rejecting the claim for conversion of the petitioners into full time casual labourers, (2) for grant of temporary status, (3) to declare that the termination of the services of the petitioners by the appellants by shifting to contractors without any valid reason, notice or at least an order in writing, as arbitrary an...
Vedpal and ors. Vs. Shakuntala @ Aruna
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALD79; 2005(3)ALT352
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard both sides.2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order and decree, dt. 13-9-2004, passed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad (for brevity 'the lower appellate Court'), reversing the order and decree, dated 27-12-2000, passed by the Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad (for brevity 'the trial Court'), in R.C.No.94 of 1999, insofar as the finding of bona fide requirement is concerned and confirmed the finding insofar as the wilful default is concerned.3. The petitioners are the tenants and the respondent is the landlady.4. For the sake of convenience, the petitioners and the respondent will be referred as 'the tenants and the landlord' respectively.5. The landlady filed R.C.No.94 of 1999 seeking eviction of the tenants on the grounds of wilful default and also bona fide requirement.6. Disagreeing with both the grounds of the landlord, the trial Court dismissed the said R.C.No.94 of 1999, against which an ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›