Andhra Pradesh Court December 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cable Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
Reported in: AIR2006AP55; 2006(2)ALD198; 2006(2)ALT281
G. Rohini, J.1. The respondent-Transmission Corporation of A.P. Limited issued Tender Notice No. APT 13/2005 dated 30-5-2005 inviting sealed bids for the supply and laying of 220 KV, 1000 Sq.mm XLPE underground copper cable with associated accessories including services for laying, jointing, terminations, site testing, commissioning the complete cable system for a quantity of 33 Kms.2. The petitioner-company claims to have engaged in the business of manufacture, supply and installation of electric cables of various specifications for the past four decades. It is also claimed that it executed works/contracts with various Government Agencies including Electricity Boards throughout the country particularly of manufacturing and laying cables of 220 KV, It has its factory at Borivali, Mumbai and has got the manufacturing facility for manufacturing specialised cables particularly required by the various Electricity Boards.3. In the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge som...
Sakthi Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Sri Krishna Coir Rope Industry
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
Reported in: 2006(3)ALD119; 2006(3)ALT630
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 29 of 2001 on the file of fl Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Produttur filed LA. No. 659 of 2004 under Order XIV Rule 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the Code') praying the Court to try the issue relating to limitation as preliminary issue. The learned Judge by order dated 21-9-2005 dismissed the said application and aggrieved by the same, the petitioner in LA. No. 659 of 2004, the defendants in the suit in O.S. No. 29 of 2001 has preferred the present C.R.P., under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. Sri Vardineni Krishna Mohan, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioners made the following submissions:The learned Counsel had taken this Court through the language employed in Order XIV Rule 2 of the Code and would contend that even on the face of the allegations made in the plaint, the suit is clearly barred by time and hence, the question of limitation is to be trie...
Government of A.P. and ors. Vs. Boyapati Sleeva Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
Reported in: 2006(3)ALD502
A. Gopal Reddy, J1. The facts in these two appeals are substantially similar and the question that falls for consideration is also common. Therefore, these two appeals are clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. State of Andhra Pradesh and its officers who are defendants in the suits, OS Nos. 51/1994 and 69/93, filed these appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgments and decrees dated 29-10-1999 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda in decreeing the suits of the plaintiff/s filed for recovery of compensation for the land taken by the defendants with interest.3. The relevant facts, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of these appeals lie in a narrow compass.4. The first defendant issued Notification on 21-6-1969 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') proposing to acquire Ac.8-38 guntas in S.Nos.820, 821, 825 and 471 for the purpose of construction of Camp...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›