Andhra Pradesh Court November 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chendipudi Siva Rama Krishna Reddy Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD191
ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. All these writ petitions have been filed by different Members of various Primary Agricultural Co-operative Societies (PACS) seeking a writ of mandamus to set aside the order of the Government dated 3.11.2005 issued in G.O. Rt. No. 1166 Agriculture and Cooperation (Co-op. V(1)) Department cancelling the earlier order postponing the elections to the respective PACS and directing the Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies to take necessary action in the matter as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also to direct the respondents to follow the procedure prescribed under Sections 31 and 32 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act (for short 'the Act'), 1964 and Rules 18 and 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules (for short 'the Rules'), 1964.2. Heard the elaborate arguments of Sri T. Lakshmi Narayana, Smt. Kavitha Gottipati...
D. Rama Murthy Vs. District Panchayat Officer
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD335; 2006(1)ALT723
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Chandragiri Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. The respondent herein passed an order dated 19.9.2005, withdrawing the powers of the petitioner to operate the funds of the Grampanchayat. The petitioner challenges the same.2. Petitioner submits that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction. He contends that the power under Rule 42(1) of the rules framed under G.O. Ms. No. 30, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development & Relief Department, dated 20.1.1995, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules', can be exercised, only against the Executive Authority of a Grampanchayat and that the Sarpanch of a village cannot be treated as, or equated to the Executive Authority.3. Sri C. Ramachandra Raju, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, for short 'the Act', maintains a clear distinction between a Sarpanch and Exe...
N. Madan Mohan Vs. N. Prabhakar Gupta
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALT222
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Mr. Prabhakar Sarma, Counsel representing the appellant/defendant in O.S. No. 48/96 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Hindupur and Ms. Thamsha Rani, Counsel representing the plaintiff in the said suit.2. The respondent herein/plaintiff originally filed the suit O.S. No. 36/90 on the file of Additional District Judge, Hindupur which was renumbered as O.S. No. 48/96 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Hindupur. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession of the 3/4th share of the plaintiff in the suit schedule property. The evidence of P.W.1 to P.W.5 and D.W.1 has been recorded. Exs.A-1 to A-5 and Exs.B-1 and B-2 were marked.3. The dispute is between the brothers. The respective lengthy pleadings of the parties need not be dealt with in elaboration. After settlement of issues, findings had been recorded by the learned Subordinate Judge and a preliminary decree was passed with costs directing division of the plaint schedule property into four equal sha...
Y. Sidda Reddy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(3)ALD546; 2006(1)ALT354
J. Chelameswar, J.1. Educational institutions both schools and colleges are organized by the Government, local bodies like Municipalities and Zilla Parishads, as also by the private organizations. The issue before us in this matter revolves around certain service conditions of the employees both teaching and non-teaching of the educational institutions run by private organisations.2. The organization of educational institutions in the private sector has been subject to regulation by the State in varying degrees from time to time. It may not be necessary to trace the entire history of such regulation by the State of the various educational institutions. In the year 1966, the State Government made rules known as the Andhra Pradesh (Integrated) Education Rules, 1966 in G.O.Ms. No. 1188, Edn., dt. 10-5-1966. At that point of time, there was no comprehensive enactment dealing with all classes of educational institutions. Therefore, the above mentioned rules were framed by the State (we pres...
Malireddy Venkata Rama Rao Vs. Malireddy Sathyaveni
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD578; II(2006)DMC22
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard both sides.2. The whole and simple question involved in this case is as to whether the Family Court at Hyderabad has jurisdiction to try O.P.No. 359 of 1997.3. The OP was filed by the husband, seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion. It is stated by the petitioner-husband that they lived together in Hyderabad till January, 1996, when desertion took place. The OP was filed in 1997.4. It appears that some documents also have been pressed into service by the husband in order to show that he lived in Hyderabad to maintain the OP in the Family Court at Hyderabad. In order to satisfy the requirement under Section 19(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, those documents have been denied by the wife. But the fact remains that after undergoing trial for five years and almost at the verge of decision being rendered by the Court, at this stage, the Court below had returned the papers to the appellant on the ground that the OP was not maintainable and i...
Bhushan Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
Reported in: (2007)6VST437(AP)
ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner invokes the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to (1) issue a writ of mandamus declaring the circular instructions of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued in CCT Ref. Al(1)/18/2004 dated June 9, 2004 as ultra vires G.O. Ms. No. 1091 dated June 10, 1957 and hence void and inoperative, (2) to set aside the notice of provisional monthly assessment and demand vide G.I. No. 15310 of 2003-04 dated June 30, 2004 issued for the assessment year 2003-04 and accordingly to interdict the second respondent from proceeding further in pursuance of the show cause notice dated June 28, 2004 for the assessment year 2003-04.2. In order to consider as to whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of any relief as prayed for, a few relevant facts leading to filing of the writ petition may have to be noticed.3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh in exercise of its power under Section 9 of t...
K.S. Sanjeeva Rao and ors. Vs. District Tribal Welfare Officer and anr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-03-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD165; 2006(1)ALT500
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Proceedings of the first respondent dated 3.2.1995, whereby the petitioner was dismissed from service, is the subject-matter of challenge in this writ petition.2. Facts, to the extent necessary for this writ petition, are that the petitioner was appointed on 19.6.1982 as an SGBT Teacher in the Ashram School and was later promoted as Head Master. Ashram Schools are run by the Integrated Tribal Development Agency, (for short 'ITDA'), a Society, constituted by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, for the development of socio-economic interests of Tribals. The expenditure of the Society is met by the Government of India and the Government of Andhra Pradesh, it is run by Government officials, funded and supervised by the Government of India. Institutions meant for Tribals, in the scheduled areas, are under the control of the ITDA, a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.3. While working as the Head Master of Ashram School, Kolleru, ...
Kereti Srinivasulu Vs. Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies and or ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-03-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD198
ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the proceedings of the 1st respondent-Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kandukur, dated 12-5-2005 as arbitrary and illegal.2. The petitioner was the elected President of The Shirdi Sai Mandal Cooperative Housing Society Limited whose term of office expired on 12-5-2005. Much prior to the expiry of the term of the Managing Committee of the society, a resolution was passed requesting the 1st respondent to conduct the elections. However, the 1st respondent failed to conduct the elections before the expiry of the term of the office of the Managing Committee and therefore the Managing Committee passed another resolution dated 7-5-2005 requesting the 1st respondent to continue the existing Managing Committee till the elections are conducted and new body is constituted for carrying out the affairs of the society. In pursuance thereof, the 1st respondent vide proceedings dated 9-5-2005 nominated the existing ...
Gowthami Solvent Oils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Project Director, National Highway ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-03-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD82
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by Gowthami Solvent Oils Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, M. Ramchandra Rao, assailing the action of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (the Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Rajahmundry and National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi) in not considering its technical bids for Tanuku Fees Collection Booths and Krishnavaram Fees Collection Booths on National Highway No. 5 pursuant to Bid Notice No. NHAI/ PIU/RJY/2005-06, dated 27-7-2005.2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 invited bids for collection of Fees on National Highway No. 5 for collection booth located at Tanuku Village of West Godavari and Krishnavaram Village of East Godavari District. The petitioner company down loaded a copy of bid document from the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 website. The bids were to be submitted in two envelopes. The first envelop containing technical bid and the second envelope containing the financial bid. The process o...
Moguluru Eswaraiah Vs. Gollapalli Venkataramaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-03-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALT193
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. In a decree for recovery of money obtained by him against the revision petitioner, respondent filed an execution petition seeking arrest of the revision petitioner. Overruling the objections raised by the revision petitioner, the executing Court ordered arrest of the revision petitioner. Hence this revision petition.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that since revision petitioner has no means to discharge the decretal amount, the executing Court ordering his arrest without regard to Rule 37 of Order 21 C.P.C. is improper. He faintly contended that the executing Court was also in error in ordering the arrest of the revision petitioner even without issuing a notice to him in the E.P., and ultimately made a request for grant of time for payment of the E.P. amount.3. Since revision petitioner filed counter in the E.P., his contention that he had no notice of the filing of the E.P., has no substance. The documents produced by the revi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »