Andhra Pradesh Court September 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rdf Projects Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director, M. Venkateshwarlu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD701; [2005]124CompCas184(AP); (2005)4CompLJ104(AP); [2005]59SCL311(AP)
N.V. Ramana, J. 1. This appeal under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Companies Act') is directed against the order dated 20-4-2004 passed by the Company Law Board, Additional Principal Bench, Chennai, in C.A. No. 37 of 2004, refusing to stay the proceedings in C.P. No. 25 of 2003, pending before it, until the conclusion of the suit proceedings in O.S. No. 61 of 2002, pending on the file of the XIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. The facts necessary for disposing of this appeal, may briefly be stated, and they run thus: Appellant No. 1, namely M/s. RDF Power Projects Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), incorporated by appellant No. 2 and the respondents, for establishment of power generation plant by using municipal solid waste. Appellant No. 2, it appears, was appointed as Managing Director of the company vide resolution dated 27-12-1998 for a period of five years. While functioning as such, he states that the respondents who...
Lutheran High School, (Under the Management of Ael Church) Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD651
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. Lutheran High School, Jampeta in Rajahmundry, the petitioner herein sought permission to fill up three aided posts of Record Assistant by making an application on 28.10.1997. The District Educational Officer, Kakinada, the first respondent herein by proceedings dated 29.11.1997 accorded permission to the petitioner. However by another proceedings, dated 10.12.1997, the first respondent directed the management of the petitioner not to fill up the posts of Record Assistant until further orders. Later the petitioner was informed by proceedings dated 12.05.1999 that it has to obtain necessary clearance from the Department of Finance & Planning, Government of A.P. The petitioner, therefore, filed a Writ Petition being W.P.No.17018 of 1999 questioning the proceedings of the first respondent dated 12.05.1999. This Court disposed of the Writ Petition directing the first respondent to accord permission to fill up three vacancies to the post of Record Assistant left unfille...
A.P. Punjabi Sabhra Rep. by Its President Dr. Bansilar Vig Vs. the Joi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD644
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This revision is directed against the order dated 20.02.2004 passed by the Joint Collector, Hyderabad, the first respondent, under Section 24 of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'). Through that order, the first respondent dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 06.06.2002 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad (Inams Tribunal), the second respondent, issuing the Occupancy Rights Certificate (O.R.C.) under the provisions of that Act in respect of the land admeasuring 3500 sq. yards in survey Nos. 22 and 24 of Daiara village, Himayathnagar Mandal, Hyderabad District, in favour of respondents 3 to 5 (hereinafter be referred to as 'the contesting respondents').2. Claiming to be the lineal descendants of one Zainulabeddin and his wife Ayesha Begum, the contesting respondents filed an application before the second respondent under Section 4 of the Act, for grant of O.R.C. in...
K. Vijay Kumar Vs. State of A.P. Represented by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD(Cri)207; 2005CriLJ456; I(2005)DMC720
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Padmanabha Reddy, Senior Counsel representing the appellant-accused and Sri Mohd. Osman Shaheed, Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The sole accused in Sessions Case No.369 of 1993 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Anantapur, aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed under Section 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), on 10.7.1997, had preferred the present appeal.3. The learned Senior Counsel Sri Padmanabha Reddy had drawn the attention of this Court to Exs.D1 to D3 and would contend that what had been recorded by the M.R.O at the time of the inquest, Exs.D1 and D2 and also Ex.D-3 letter of the deceased, would clearly go to show that the version of the prosecution definitely cannot be believed. The learned Counsel would submit that however, so far as it relates to the charge under Section 306 IPC is concerned, the appellant-accused was found not guilty by the learned Judge. The learned Senior Counsel also pointed out that P.W.1 at the firs...
Bhukya Yadagiri Vs. State of A.P. Represented by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2005(2)ALD(Cri)258
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Madhusudhana Rao, Counsel representing Sri V.Sree Ranga Rao, Counsel for appellant-A3 and Sri Mohd. Usman Saheed, Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The appellant-A3 preferred the present criminal appeal against the conviction and sentence dated 17.07.1998, made in C.C.No.1 of 1996 on the file of the II Additional sessions Judge, Warangal. 3. A1 to A3 in Crime No.8 of 1996 of Ghanpur (W) Police Station were charged with an offence under Section 392 IPC and at the stage of trial A2 died, and hence, the case against A2 was abated. A1 and A3 were tried and on the strength of the evidence of P.Ws 1 to 5, Exs.P1 to P7 and the material objects, the learned Judge found A1 and A3 guilty of an offence under Section 412 IPC and sentenced them to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years each, and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three months each. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal had be...
General Manager, South Central Railway Vs. E. Ramamohan Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD283
L. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. Respondents 1 and 2 filed O.A.A. No. 70 of 1998, before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench, pleading that their son, by name, Sridhar (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') was scheduled to attend an Interview at the Visakhapatnam Naval Base on 3.11.1997, and for that purpose, he along with his grand-mother, boarded Train No. 471, Vijayawada-Visakhapatnam passenger on 1.11.1997 at Vijayawada. They stated that, he fell down from the train at Bayyavaram Railway Station near Tuni, and died. They claimed compensation by alleging that the incident is the result of an accidental fell.2. The appellant filed a written statement denying its liability. It was stated that there was nothing to disclose that the death of the deceased occurred on account of an accidental fall from the train, and that, at any rate, the death occurred on account of negligence on the part of the deceased.3. The first respondent was examined as AW-1 and the grand-mother of the...
South Central Railway Vs. E. Ramamohan Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 3(2005)ACC232
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed O.A.A. No. 70 of 1998, before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench, pleading that their son, by name, Sridhar (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') was scheduled to attend an interview at the Visakhapatnam Naval Base on 3.11.1997, and for that purpose, he along with his grand mother, boarded Train No. 471, Vijayawada-Visakhapatnam passenger on 1.11.1997 at Vijayawada. They stated that, he fell down from the train at Bayyavaram Railway Station near Tuni, and died. They claimed compensation by alleging that the incident is the result of an accidental fall.2. The appellant filed a written statement denying its liability. It was stated that there was nothing to disclose that the death of the deceased occurred on account of an accidental fall from the train, and that, at any rate, the death occurred on account of negligence on the part of the deceased.3. The first respondent was examined as A.W. 1 and the grand-mother o...
Sub-registrar and anr. Vs. K. Veereswara Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2004
Reported in: AIR2005AP243; 2004(6)ALT739
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This revision presents an instance as to how the financial necessities of an individual would expose him or her to several compulsions and thereby make them to face the adverse consequences. Though the revision arises out of an order passed in a civil miscellaneous appeal filed under Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, it has a background spread over about three decades.2. The mother of the respondent viz. K. Anasuya was the absolute owner of the property admeasuring 1350 sq. yards in premises No.16-2-705/1/5, Malakpet, Hyderabad. In September 1970, she was in dire need of a sum of Rs.12,000/- and approached one person viz. Ch. Bikshapathy for the same. He paid that amount. On 29.09.1970, a sale deed was executed conveying the said property in his favour and on the same day, an agreement of re-conveyance was executed to the effect that in case, she refunds the same amount within six years, he shall re-convey the property to her.3. Smt. Anasuya offe...
St. theresa's Tender Loving Care Home, A Soceity Registered under the ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD620
T. Meena Kumari, J.1. As the issue involved in all these CMAs are identical in nature, they are clubbed together and are being disposed of by this common Judgment. The appellant in all these CMAs is St. Theresa's Tender Loving Care Home.2. For the sake of convenience, the facts in CMA No.839 of 2004, which was filed against the order of the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad dated 19.2.2004 in OP No.646 of 2001, has been narrated. The first appellant herein is the first petitioner in the OP i.e., St. Theresa's Tender Loving Care Home, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. Petitioners 2 and 3 in the said OP are the adoptive foreign parents.3. The appellant herein is the first petitioner and the first respondent herein is the second respondent and respondents 2 and 3 herein are petitioners 2 and 3 in the OP. The first respondent in the OP, shown as, 'all concerned' is not made as party in this C MA. The parties would be referred to as they were arrayed in the O.P.4. The brief facts that led to the filing ...
Bandaru Ramana and ors. Vs. Gedela Appalanaidu Alias Naidubabu and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD413; 2004(6)ALT500
D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard both the Counsel.2. This second appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.11.1996 passed by the Court of District Judge, Vizianagaram in A.S. No. 79/1995.3. By the impugned judgment and decree, the lower appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree dated 1.12.1994 passed by the Court of District Munsif, Srungavarapukota in O.S. No. 291/1982 and thereby decreed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for recovery of possession and for other reliefs. Thus aggrieved by the reversal of the judgment of the Trial Court, the original defendants filed this second appeal.4. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants i.e., as per their array in the original suit in O.S. No. 291/1982.5. The brief facts of the case are that the suit lands originally belong to one late Chalumuri Perinaidu and Chalumuri Appadamma is his wife. They had a son and daughter by names Narayana and Simhachalam. Chalumuri Narayana marri...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »