Andhra Pradesh Court August 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gutturthi Eswara Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Reprsented by Public ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD(Cri)198; 2005CriLJ1632
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Gutturthi Eswara Rao, the accused in Sessions Case No.17 of 1997, aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed in Sessions Case No.17 of 1997 on the file of Court of Session, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam, dated 25-09-1998 had preferred the present Criminal Appeal.2. The facts in brief are that the Inspector of Police, II Town Law and Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam city laid charge sheet against the accused alleging that he trespassed into the house of Busha Ramayamma @ Bhanu-P.W.1 on 10-08-1996 at about 23.30 hours and outraged her modesty by touching her legs punishable under Sections 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter in short referred to as 'IPC' for the purpose of convenience). The learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, took the charge sheet on file and registered the same as P.R.C.No.15 of 1996 and committed the same to the Court of Session, Visakhapatnam and the said Court had made over the same to the Mahila Court, Visakhapat...
K.S.V. Raja Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD551
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The two writ petitions are filed by one K.S.V. Raja of Narsapur in West Godavari District challenging the action of Respondents 1 to 3 in accepting the tender of fourth respondent for the works for which tenders were invited. As the controversy arises in relation to the same Notice Inviting Tenders (NIT), and the grounds of challenge and the defense of the impugned action is the same, the two writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.2. Third respondent, who is Convenor of the Tender Committee of South Central Railway, issued NIT dated 4.3.2004, inviting tenders for three works. We are concerned with two works, namely, (i) Restoration of BG line between Kakinada Town and Kotipalli. Proposed improvements to the existing station building and other passenger amenities at Kakinada Town Station (hereafter called, Work-1) and (ii) Improvements to circulating area on both sides of Kakinada Town Station and construction of second booking office on West sid...
Hind Re-rolling Industries Vs. Apseb and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD722
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are consumers of electricity supply by the respondents. In some cases, they are existing consumers and others are new consumers, who applied for service connection. The respondents while considering applications made by petitioners for supplying the electricity or for enhancing existing load, advised the petitioners to pay the estimated cost of necessary charges and service line charges to enable the respondents to consider the request of the petitioners. Insofar as the demand for payment of service line charges is concerned, the petitioners have no grievance. The respondents while giving estimate of the cost involved for giving power supply also imposed development charges. In the case of M/s. Hind Re-Rolling Industries, petitioner in Writ Petition No. 8962 of 1995, the Divisional Electrical Engineer informed the petitioner that an amount of Rs.5,53,400/-(Rupees five lakhs fifty three thousand and four hundred only), i...
S.K.R.B.R. College Rep. by Its Secretary and Correspondent, and Vs. St ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALT177
Goda Raghuram, J.1. The management of the S.K.R.B.R. College, Narsaraopet, Guntur district (for short 'the College') has filed this writ petition challenging the order of the State Government in G.O.Rt. No. 582 Education (C.E.-II) Department dated 20-05-1996 (for short 'G.O. Rt. No. 582') whereby the appeal of the 3rd respondent instituted under Section 81 (3) of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 (for short 'the Act') was allowed, the order of the Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Guntur (for short 'the RJD') dated 28-02-1992 was set aside and the writ petitioner-Management directed to reinstate the 3rd respondent herein into service with immediate effect, to treat the break period (during which he was out of service consequent on his removal from service) as on duty and to pay his salary and allowances from the management fund. The Government order also observed that allowing of the appeal did not preclude the management from taking up a fresh inquiry in accordance wit...
Nutri Solvextract Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sri S.L.S. Ahmed, Sole Arbitrator and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-2004
Reported in: I(2005)ACC857; 2004(5)ALT555; 2005(1)ARBLR141(AP); II(2005)BC505
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This revision petition is filed by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 359 of 1989 on the file of the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, aggrieved by the order in I.A. No. 1241 of 1994 dated 14-09-1999.2. The petitioner is a Company, dealing with supply of chemicals. It insured its godowns with the United India Insurance Company, the second respondent herein. A fire accident occurred on 15-06-1986 in one of its godowns. The petitioner made a claim with the second respondent. In terms of the contract of Insurance, the claim of the petitioner was referred to an Arbitrator, the first respondent. On a consideration of the claim and on examination of the matter, the first respondent passed an Award for Rs. 4,12,335/- dated 04-01-1989. The petitioner filed O.S. No. 359 of 1989 under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short, 'the Act'), making the Award of the Arbitrator, as rule of the Court. The suit was decreed on 29-03-1994 and it became fi...
The Public Prosecutor Vs. Jangili Sammaiah Alias Babu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD(Cri)579; 2004CriLJ4489; I(2005)DMC811
P.S. Narayana, J. 1. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Ms. Hema Jaiswal representing respondent-accused. 2. The State had preferred the present appeal as against the judgment of the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Warangal, dated the 26th day of August, 1996, in Sessions Case No. 76 of 1996. Respondent-accused, Janjgili Sammaiah alias Babu, was charged with an offfence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased, Janjgili Narasamma, the wife of the accused and daughter of P. W. 1, was blessed with a son, but subsequent thereto, respondent accused raised a dispute that the deceased was unfit for sexual intercourse and was harassing her to die so that he could marry again. The accused also drove her away from his house and as such she started living with her parents. A panchayat was also held in this regard and it appears that the panchayatdars advised the accused to pay some amount and also give some...
Battina Dharma Rao Vs. State, Rep. by the Sub Inspector of Police, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD(Cri)784; 2005CriLJ362
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri A. Ravi Sankar, the learned counsel, representing appellant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.2. The sole accused in Sessions Case No. 161 of 1993, on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sompeta had preferred the present Criminal Appeal.3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 21.2.1993 at 5.30 p.m., when P.W.1-Sangaru Papamma was returning from the 'coconut tope' of her brother and going to her village, on the way, the accused with an intention to commit rape on her, taking the advantage that she alone was returning through that way, forcibly caught her, threw her on the ground and when he tried to remove her saree, she raised alarming cry and the accused grew wild and gave a blow with his long handle knife on her right upper arm, causing severe bleeding injury to P.W.1 and on receiving said injury she fell un-conscious. On hearing the cries of P.W.1, P.Ws. 2 to P.W.4 and others came there and witnessed the incident and found ...
FaqruddIn Vs. Didde Mahadevappa and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALT469
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The first defendant in O.S. No. 32 of 1998 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal is the petitioner in this revision.2. Respondents filed the suit against the petitioner and four others, for the relief of declaration of title, recovery of possession and consequential injunction in respect of the suit schedule property, which is a small extent of 38 sq. yards, situate in Survey No. 923/1 of Ieeja village and mandal. After contest by the parties, the trial Court decreed the suit through its Judgment dated 28.04.2004. The respondents filed E.P. No. 91 of 2004 for delivery of possession. Through order dated 30.06.2004, the executing Court issued warrant for delivery of possession of the EP schedule property.3. The petitioner contends that the decree in O.S. No. 32 of 1998 does not contain any direction as to the delivery of possession and in that view of the matter, it was not competent for the executing Court to issue warrant for the same.4. Learned counsel for...
Collector and District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD475; 2004(6)ALT623
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This revision is filed against the order, dated 23-12-1999, passed by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in C.M.A. No. 183 of 1998.2. Respondents 1 and 2 purchased an extent of 73 square yards of land with a dilapidated house in a slum area in Chikkadapally. They presented the document for registration in the year 1998. It was their case that the agreement of sale was executed in 1989 and on account of the non-co-operation of the vendor, the registration could not take place immediately. The consideration for the transaction was shown as Rs. 2,00,000/-. Respondents 1 and 2 paid the stamp duty and registration charges of Rs. 27,280/-. The Sub-Registrar, Chikkadapally, raised an objection as to the valuation of the property and referred the matter under Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, to the District Collector. Through his order, dated 21-5-1998, the District Collector, held that the value of the property arrived at Rs. 8,000/- per squa...
Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ummadi Shankunth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-10-2004
Reported in: I(2005)ACC112; 2006ACJ2606; AIR2005AP336; 2004(5)ALD692; 2004(5)ALT525
D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi Counsel for the appellants-Insurance Company and Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy, Counsel for the respondents-claimants.2. A.S. No. 2382/2004 is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.4.2004 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Miryalguda in O.S. No. 124/2002. By the impugned judgment and decree the Court below decreed the suit filed by the plaintiffs and directed the defendants to pay a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- to the plaintiffs towards the suit amount with interest on Rs. 5,00,000/- at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6 per cent per annum till the date of realization. The Court below also awarded a sum of Rs. 28,399/- towards the costs. Aggrieved by the above order, the defendants before the Court below which is an insurance company, filed this appeal.3. The claimants also filed cross-objection challenging the very same judgment and decree, aggrieved by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »