Andhra Pradesh Court July 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bollineni Pedayogaiah and ors. Vs. Joint Collector/Settlement Officer ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD597; 2004(5)ALT806
ORDERT. Meena Kumari, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the second respondent in R.P.32/90(A2), dated 25.3.1991, and consequential action of the Respondents 3 and 4, in directing the petitioners not to enter into the lands situated in Sy.Nos. 96 and 171 of Toorpuchoutupalem admeasuring Ac.1.52 cents and Ac.12.73 cents respectively, as illegal and arbitrary.2. It is the case of the petitioners that the Additional Assistant Settlement Officer, Nellore, in his proceedings Sr.No. 505/11/A/ 63, dated 27.2.1971, granted pattas in favour of the father of the 1st petitioner and the Petitioners 2 and 3 to an extent of Ac.12.73 cents in Sy.No. 171 of Toorpuchoutupalem Village under Section 11(a) of the Estate Abolition Act. It is also their case that Petitioners 4, 5 and 6 have purchased Ac.3-00 cents and Ac.1-00 cents respectively from the original grantees through a registered sale deed, dated 6.7.1987 and since then they have b...
Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Secretary, Railway Board and ors. Vs. A.S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2004
Reported in: [2005(105)FLR1180]; (2005)IILLJ76AP
ORDERJ. Chelameswar, J.1. Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners Sri S.R. Ashok and learned counsel for the respondent Ms. S. Anuradha.2. The first petitioner is the Union of India and the other two petitioners are various authorities under the control of the South Central Railway. The respondent herein was an employee with the second petitioner.3. The respondent was working as Office Superintendent Grade-I in the office of the Chief Controller of Stores, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad. While so, a charge sheet dated May 22, 1997 was issued containing three charges, the details of which are not necessary for the purpose of this writ petition. Suffice to say that the charges relate to the failure on the part of the respondent to supervise the stores, thereby resulting in loss of Rs. 3,00,000/- (approximately) to the employer. It appears that the charge sheet did not reach a logical conclusion for quite some time. But the respondent retired on May 31, 199...
Chinnakondu Kondaiah Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD(Cri)420; 2004CriLJ3901
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Chinnakondu Kondaiah, the sole accused in Sessions Case No. 50 of 1995 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Rayachoty is the appellant. The appellant-accused was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Rayachoty under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month.2. Facts in brief, are as follows:The date of incident is 01-08-1993 at about 11.45 a.m. It is stated that the appellant-accused committed rape on P. Adilakshumamma (PW2), who was the daughter of P. Pullaiah (PW1) in the fields of Palam Burujupalli near Maddela Chenu Mango garden on the aforesaid date and time. The defacto-complainant - P. Pullaiah (PW1) and the accused are residents of Palam Burujupalli, Hamlet of B. Yerragudi village and P.W.2 Adilakshumamma is the daughter of PW1 aged about 15 years. The accused is ...
Toddy Cooperative Society, Rep. by Its President Pappanna Gari Chandra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD188; 2004(6)ALT205
ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. The petitioner, a Toddy Cooperative Society at Lingannapet Village, Ghambheeraopet Mandal, Karimnagar District is holding a licence for sale of toddy which is valid upto 30-09-2004. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Karimnagar District, dated 28-06-2004 whereunder the licence of the petitioner Society has been suspended with immediate effect pending enquiry. 2. In the impugned proceedings, dated 28-06-2004, it is stated that on 10-01-2004 at about 5.30 pm the Assistant Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, AC Enforcement, Karimnagar inspected the petitioner Society and has drawn three samples of toddy under cover of panchnama. The said samples have been sent to Chemical Examiner, Warangal for analysis. As per the analysis report of the Chemical Examiner, Warangal, dated 31-05-2004, the toddy was found to be adulterated with Chloral Hydrate. Thus, the petitioner has contravened Rule 5 of A.P. Excise (T...
Ballala Venkateswarlu S/O. Thogata Ballala Pedda Kondaiah Vs. State Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ1577
G. Bikshapathy, J.1. A-1 to A-4 were tried for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. A-1 was also tried for the offence punishable under Section 404 IPC. The learned III Addl. Sessions Judge, Kurnool, acquitted A-2 to A-4, however convicted A-1 for the offence under Section 302 IPC and imposed sentence of imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year. A-1 was further convicted for the offence under Section 404 IPC and he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Aggrieved by the convictions and sentences imposed against A-1, the present appeal has been preferred.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that A-1 is a resident of Nossam village and A-2 to A-4 are residents of Jammalamadugu village of Kadapa District. The deceased Pany...
Asra Begum Vs. Regional Passport Officer
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD360
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the Passport Issuing Authority, respondent herein, in insisting the petitioner to get declaratory order for correction of date of birth as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondent to reconsider the case of petitioner in terms of Circular dated 18-4-2001 issued by Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that she was born on 17-11-1979. In 1997, she applied for passport and in the application for passport inadvertently she mentioned the date of birth as 17-11-1972. Accordingly, passport bearing No. A 3139759 was issued on 26-6-1997 showing her date of birth as 17-11-1972. She approached the respondent with a request to change the date of birth. The respondent by communication dated 15-6-2004 informed the petitioner to furnish declaratory order from Court for correction of date of birth. Hence, the present writ peti...
Charles Joseph Vs. Managing Director and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD95; 2004(6)ALT807
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This revision is filed by the Judgment-debtor in the decree passed in O.S. No. 373 of 1992 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal.2. Smt. Veronica, the second respondent herein, filed O.S. No. 373 of 1992 against the petitioner for recovery of a sum of Rs. 34,072/-. During pendency of the suit, the second respondent filed I.A. No. 1585 of 1992 under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 C.P.C. Through order dated 01.12.1992, the trial Court effected attachment before Judgment in relation to the property mentioned in the petition. The suit was decreed on 16.12.1994 and it became final. 3. Since the petitioner did not satisfy the decree, the second respondent filed E.P. No. 50 of 1997 to bring the attached property to sale. The petitioner raised several objections from time to time, before the property attached in I.A. No. 1585 of 1992 was brought to sale. In the ultimate sale of the property that was held at the executing Court, the first respondent emerg...
C.B.S. Venkata Ramana, Commissioner of Family Welfare and Ex-officio S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD(Cri)347
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order in Criminal Appeal No. 18 of 1999, dated 30.07.2001 on the file of the Sessions Court, Karimnagar. The Criminal Appeal in turn was filed against the order, dated 2.05.1994, passed by the District Collector, Karimnagar-second respondent herein, in exercise of powers under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act). 2. The rice mill of the petitioner was inspected by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Jagtial, on 26.07.1988. Huge stocks of paddy, rice and broken rice were seized and proceedings were initiated under the Act; on the ground that there was variation in stocks. After issuing show-cause notice to the petitioner and hearing him, the second respondent directed confiscation of 50% of the seized stock. In the appeal before the Sessions Court, the confiscation was restricted to 10%. This Court allowed the Criminal Revision Case, through an order dated 3.03.2003. It ...
ANGR Agricultural University Retired Teachers' Association, rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD244; 2004(4)ALT666
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. All the writ petitions involve substantially similar issues and are therefore considered together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. W.P. No. 1368 of 2001 is filed by Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University Retired Teachers' Association, Hyderabad and two retired teachers of the University (ANGRAU).3. W.P. No. 16407 of 2001 is filed by the Retired College Teachers' Association and two retired teachers.4. W.P. No. 23938 of 2001 is filed by the Affiliated College Teachers' Association and 67 other teachers or spouses of retired teachers.5. W.P. No. 6122 of 2002 is by 13 retired teachers.6. The challenge in these writ petitions is to the orders of the State Government in G.O. (P) No. 95 and G.O. (P) No. 389 Finance (Pension-I) Department, dated 1.8.2000 and 19.7.2003 respectively. The relief sought by the petitioners is for - (a) consolidation of the basic pension by merging the Dearness Relief (DR) as on 1.1.1996 instead of from 1.7.1998 and other fixa...
Apsrtc Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer and anr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2004
Reported in: AIR2005AP128; 2004(5)ALD1; 2004(4)ALT704
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') filed these applications seeking leave of this Court to file a review petition, to condone the delay of 5509 days in filing the review petition and to review the judgment dated 24.2.1989 passed in A.S. No. 1582 of 1982 by a learned Single Judge of this Court. All these applications are being disposed of by a common order.2. That in order to consider as to whether the petitioner-Corporation has made out any case requiring the interference of this Court to review the judgment rendered by this Court after a period of 15 long years, a few relevant facts may have to be noticed.3. The petitioner-Corporation some time in June, 1974 placed a requisition with the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool to acquire an extent of Acs.37.17 cents of land covered by Sy.Nos. 412, 413, 415, 416, 417, 418 and 430 etc., situated at Kallur Village of Kurnool Town for construction of a Bu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »