Andhra Pradesh Court October 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rathod Narayana and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ498
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Crl. A.No. 1713/98 is preferred by A-2 and A-4 as against the Judgment dated 2-12-1998 in S.C.No.27/97(D) on the file of IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. Crl.A.No.1741/98 is preferred by A-5 as against the Judgment in S.C.No.27/97 on the file of IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. 2. The C.I. of Police, Chiragpally Police Station laid charge sheet in Cr.No.37/94 as against A-1 to A-7 for an offence punishable under Section 395 IPC and the case against A-6 was split up and the case against A-7 was deleted and A-1 to A-5 were tried. The learned IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad to whom the matter was made over recorded the evidence of PW-1 to PW-11, marked Exs.P-1 to P-16 and M.Os.1 to 4 and convicted A-2, A-4 and A-5 under Section 395 I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each and in default of payment of fine, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for 3 m...
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Dagada Bujji Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ835
P.S. Narayana, J. 1. The State preferred the present Appeal as against an order of acquittal recorded in S.C. No. 60/97 on the file of Assistant sessions Judge, Kavali. 2. The S.I. of Police, Kaligiri Police Station filed charge sheet against the accused under Sections 307 and 324 IPC in Cr.No. 29/96. The case of the prosecution is that the accused is a resident of Kaligiri. Dagada Srinivasulu Reddy is a resident of Kaligiri and he is the elder brother of the accused. Dagada Vijayamma is the wife of the said Srinivasulu Reddy. It is also the version of the prosecution that there are ill-feelings between the accused and Dagada Srinivasulu Reddy with regard to the division of their ancestral properties and in consequence of it there are misunderstandings at the cutting of Japan Babul trees in the disputed site which is on the Southern side of Arundhatiyawada. While so on 25-6-1996 at about 11 A.M. while Srinivasulu Reddy along with his wife was cutting Japan Babul trees the accused went ...
Kalla Ramakrishna Vs. State Election Commission Represented by Its Sec ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD587; 2004(6)ALT638; [2005(2)JCR40(AP)]
A. Gopal Reddy, J.1. The facts giving rise to the reference before the Full Bench in the Writ Appeal may be stated in nutshell as follows:2. Appellant's writ petition questioning the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram dt.30-7-2004 dismissing his appeal filed under Rule 9(6) of the Rules framed under A.P. Panchayat Raj Act,1994 (for short 'the Act') by G.O.Ms. No. 755 Panchayat Raj dt. 30-11-1994 and as amended by G.O.Ms. No. 279 dt. 19-5-1995 against rejection of his nomination for by-election of Ward No.3 of Peddanapalli Gram Panchayat, Yeleswaram Mandal, East Godavari District was dismissed by the learned single Judge by placing reliance upon the decision of a Division Bench of this court in K. RAMULU V. COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT ELECTION AUTHORITY & OTHERS, : 2001(4)ALT389 and two others decisions, namely, CH. RAMACHANDRA RAO v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & OTHERS, 2002(2) ALT 655 and V. NARAYANA V. ELECTION OFFICER, ALWAL MUNICIPALITY & OTHERS, 2000(3) ALT 61, holding th...
Mallela Peda Venkateswara Reddy @ Peda Venkateswarlu and 10 ors. Vs. t ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD(Cri)670
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J. 1. This petition is filed to quash the proceedings in PRC No.22 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kandukuru, registered under Section 3(1)(x) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (the Act), and Section 447 IPC on the ground that the investigation was not conducted by the Officer of the rank of the Sub Divisional Police Officer, as mandated by Rule 7 of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 (the Rules). 2. Since a reading of the charge sheet shows that the investigation was conducted by LWs.8 and 9 who are the Sub Inspectors of Police and that LW.10 i.e., Sub Divisional Police Officer only verified the investigation made by the Sub Inspectors of Police and filed charge sheet after finding it to be on proper lines, it is clear that the investigation was not actually conducted by an Officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police. Rule 7 of ...
C.J. Ayodhya Ram Singh and ors. Vs. B. Venkatamuni and anr Overruled
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD607; 2004(6)ALT693
Devinder Gupta, C.J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal is by the plaintiffs. Before the District Judge, Chittoor and before the learned single Judge, they have remained unsuccessful in getting an order of Probate or Letters of Administration with will dated 29.3.1968 annexed to enable Plaintiff No.1 to realise the assets of deceased Smt. B. Akkayamma, the testator. 2. Facts in brief are that O.P. No. 102 of 1970 was filed on the file of District Judge, Chittoor for grant of a Probate by the plaintiffs. Respondent-defendant No.1 was not impleaded as a party initially. Subsequently, by way of amendment, prayer was amended to include therein, an alternative prayer to grant Letters of Administration. Respondent No.1 had by that time also lodged a caveat opposing grant of probate. The plaintiffs and Defendant No.1 had led their respective evidence. After hearing arguments, on 2.7.1975, District Judge disposed of the O.P. holding that the will propounded by Plaintiff No.1 was true, valid and bin...
S.C. Co. Ltd. Vs. United Constructions Co. Engineers and Contractors
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD46
L. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment, dated 20.01.2000, of the District Judge, Karimnagar, in O.P. No. 62 of 1997. 2. The appellant invited tenders for the work of 'construction of 2000 MT Capacity G.L.Bunkers' at 10A Incline Govdavarikhani, Karimnagar District, through a tender notice, dated 23.12.1991. The value of the work was estimated at Rs.42,85,343.71 ps. The respondent emerged as the successful tenderer and was assigned the work. After completion of the work, the respondent submitted a claim for a sum of Rs.7,91,763.66 ps. alleging that the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms. No. 34, dated 24.02.1992, enhancing the minimum wages for un-skilled, semi-skilled and skilled labourers and thereby, he had to incur the additional expenditure. 2. The appellant did not accede to the request of the respondent. It pleaded that under Clause 24 of the General Conditions, it is the obligation of the respondent to meet any expenditure,...
Sridevgamma Vs. K. Shivaraj and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD836; 2005(1)ALT212
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the order, dated 12.08.2004, passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet, in I.A. No. 159 of 2003 in A.S. No. 9 of 2003. 2. The petitioner filed O.S.31 of 1999 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Kodangal, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of houses bearing Nos.18-106 to 110 of Kosgi Village, Mahbubnagagr District. The petitioner pleaded the necessary ingredients as to title and possession, in respect of all items of the suit schedule property. The respondents, on the other hand, pleaded their own independent title and possession. After trial, the suit was decreed insofar as it relates to house Nos. 18-106 to 109, but was dismissed in relation to house No.18-110. 3. The petitioner filed A.S. No. 9 of 2003, aggrieved by the decree insofar as it denied part of the relief to her. She also filed I.A. No. 159 of 2003, under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C., seeking permission of the Court to fil...
T. Chandrasekharaiah Vs. D. Sreeramulu Chetty and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: AIR2005AP195; 2005(1)ALD149; 2005(1)ALT407; II(2007)BC76
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This civil miscellaneous second appeal is filed against the concurrent judgments in I.P. No. 1 of 1994 and A.S. No. 27 of 2000 rendered by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoti, and the Principal District Judge, Kadapah, respectively.2. The appellant filed I.P. No. 1 of 1994, under Section 10 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), to adjudge him as insolvent. He pleaded that he is indebted to Respondents 1 to 46, to the tune of Rs. 13,57,000/-, the details of which are furnished in Schedule 'A'. It is his case that the house in 'B' schedule, was his immovable property, but was agreed to be sold in favour of the first respondent, through an agreement of sale, dated 10.2.1999, for a sum of Rs. 1,20,000/-, and that a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- was received as advance.3. The petition was resisted by Respondents 2 to 5, 12 and 43 only. Rest of the respondents remained ex parte. The contesting respondents pleaded that the debts...
RaziuddIn Mohd. Siddiqui and anr. Vs. Zaihab Khatoon and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2004(6)ALD564; 2004(6)ALT658; 2005(1)CTC179; [2005(2)JCR31(AP)]
Devinder Gupta, C.J. 1. A Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 26.4.2002 passed in CMP No. 7201 of 2002 in CCCA (SR) No. 27145 of 2002 did not agree with the view expressed and the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Chandrapalaka Prabhakar v. Chandrapalaka Sadanandam, : 1997(4)ALT689 , which in its turn had followed the decision of another Division Bench of this Court in Jokam Reddy and Ors. v. Gokar Mallaiah, : AIR1977AP367 , and thus referred the matter to a Larger Bench for an authoritative pronouncement.2. When this Bench was constituted, we noticed in our order dated 27.8.2004 that though no question had been formulated by the Division Bench, reference by the Division Bench was on two counts, namely, (1) as to the applicability of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to an application filed seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal against ex parte decree, when such an appeal is filed after dismissal of an application filed under Order IX, Rule 13 ...
thegalapalli Achamma Seva Sadan and ors. Vs. A.P. Social Welfare Resid ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD379
Devinder Gupta, C.J.1. This is a petition filed as 'public interest litigation' by the first petitioner-Sadan through its Chairman/Executive Director and by thirteen other individuals, who are parents/wards of the students undergoing studies in a residential school. The petitioners have questioned the legality and validity of the proceedings dated 10.6.2004 issued by the first respondent and consequential proceedings of the seventh respondent dated 22.6.2004 for transfer of Residential School for Girl Child Labour under World Bank Projected Scheme [APRPRP (Velugu)] to Kondapuram Village and Mandal in Jammalamadugu from Gundlakunta Village, Peddamudiyam Mandal in Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms. No. 49, Social Welfare (RS) Department, dated 24.5.2002 and consequently to direct the respondents to desist from shifting the school to Kondapuram from Gundlakunta.2. Government of Andhra Pradesh under World Bank Supported Scheme, viz., Andhra Pradesh District Pover...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »