Andhra Pradesh Court January 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Choppa Rambabu and ors. Vs. Choppa Demudamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)ALD214
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri K. Seetharam learned Counsel representing the petitioners and Sri Subrahmanyam, learned Counsel representing the respondents.2. The petitioners/plaintiffs filed this revision against an order made in I.A. No. 269 of 2003 in O.S. No. 72 of 2002 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Kottavalasa, dated 30.6.2003. The petitioners/plaintiffs filed LA. No. 269 of 2003 in O.S. No. 72of 2002 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Kottavalasa, under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short referred to as 'code' hereinafter) praying for amendment of the relief portion for recovery of possession of mesne profits. The said application was dismissed observing that the petitioners had filed the said application only to cover the latches and it would amount to allowing the parties to multiply the proceedings. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition is preferred.3. Sri Seetharam, learned Counsel representing the revision petitione...
Kolasani Ramulu (Died) Per L.Rs. Vs. Jagarlamudi Radhakrishna Murthy a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALT820
Ghulam Mohammed, J. 1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 28-08-1990 in A.S.No. 52 of 1984 on the file of learned IV Additional District Judge, Guntur, setting aside the judgment and decree of learned V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur, in O.S.No. 332 of 1978 dated 27-02-1984 and remanding the matter to the trial court for fresh disposal of the suit after giving opportunity to both the parties.2. The original appellant-plaintiff since died, his legal representatives i.e., appellants 2 and 3 were brought on record by order dated 27-11-2001 in C.M.P. NO. 21179 of 1999 passed by this Court.3. The original plaintiff is the appellant. He instituted a suit in O.S.No. 332 of 1978 on the file of V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur for declaration of title and recovery of the possession of suit schedule property and in the alternative, for a decree against defendants 1 to 3 for recovery of Rs. 2,2147-.4. The suit was filed for recovery of possession on the basis o...
M. Deva Narayana Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD892; 2004(2)ALT65
B. Sudershan Reddy, J. 1. These two writ appeals require to be disposed of together since they are directed against the common order dated 18.7.2003 made in Writ Petition Nos. 19149 and 20009 of 2002 by a learned Single Judge of this Court. For the sake of convenience, we shall refer to the parties as arrayed in the writ petitions.2. In order to consider whether the judgment under appeal suffers from any infirmities requiring our interference, it is just and necessary to notice the relevant facts.Factual Matrix:3. That an extent of 30000 square feet of land in possession of the fourth petitioner in Writ Petition No. 19149 of 2002 (who is impleaded as third respondent in Writ Appeal No. 1311 of 2003) situated outside the four Mada Street at Tirumala was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the benefit of Tirumala-Tirupati Devasthanams (for short 'TTD'). A notification dated 25.5.1987 was issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. Award dated 11...
Umde Bhojram Vs. Wadla Gangadhar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD339; IV(2004)BC311
ORDERG. Yethirajulu, J.1. This revision petition is filed by the plaintiff in OS No. 21 of 1999 under Section 115 CPC praying to set aside the order of the Junior Civil Judge, Bhainsa dated 30-9-2002.2. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 22,500/- on the basis of an unregistered mortgage deed dated 10-10-1996 alleged to be executed by the defendant in his favour. The defendant resisted the suit by contending that he never executed the mortgage deed by receiving the said amount. He undertook woodwork of the house of the plaintiff and after completion of the work the plaintiff did not settle the accounts and pay the amount to him. During the subsistence of the contract the plaintiff obtained his signature on blank stamped paper by misrepresentation and created a false and fabricated document.3. During the course of trial, the plaintiff was examined as P.W.I. In the chief-examination the plaintiff intended to mark an unregistered mortgage deed dated 10-10-1996 but the defenda...
Abdul Khader @ Abdul Rauf and ors. Vs. Aktharunnisa Begum (Died) by Lr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: AIR2004AP214; 2004(2)ALD546
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Damodar Rao, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioners and Sri T.V. Ramana Rao, representing Sri V.K. Deshpande, Counsel representing the respondents.2. The simple question raised in the present civil revision petition is whether the learned Junior Civil Judge, Utnoor can straightaway receive the documents filed along with a simple memo without observing the procedure contemplated by the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, hereinafter in short referred to as 'Code'.3. The revision petitioners herein as petitioners/defendants 1 to 5 moved LA. No. 20/2003 in O.S. No. 1/91 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Utnoor under Section 151 of the Code not to receive documents specified as 1 to 4 in evidence. Several allegations relating to the nature of the documents and also the ground that these are fabricated documents had been averred and this question may not be very relevant for the present purpose.4. Respondents filed a counter deny...
Kusam Satyanarayana Reddy and ors. Vs. Kusam Sambrajyamma (Died) by Lr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD635; 2004(3)ALT115
Bilal Nazki, J.1. First appeal has been filed by Defendants 1 to 4 against the judgment and decree dated passed by Subordinate Judge, Guntur in O.S. No. 316 of 1979. Cross-objections have been filed by the plaintiffs. Both the cases are being disposed of by this common judgment. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.2. The plaintiffs laid the suit for a declaration that the gift deed dated 6.11.1979 which was registered on 12.11.1979 purported to have been executed by late Puma Reddy in favour of Defendants 2 and 3 was illegal and void. They also sought a declaration that they were in possession of the suit property. Alternatively they prayed that if the Court did not find them in possession of the property, they should be given possession of the suit property which was gifted out and is mentioned in items 1 and 2 of plaint B schedule properties and Item No. 2 of plaint C schedule property. The plaintiffs also sought permanent injunction restraini...
The Food Inspector Division-i, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor Vs. Neela ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD(Cri)373; 2004CriLJ1849
S.R.K. Prasad, J.1. The State has preferred this appeal against the judgment of acquittal rendered in C.C.No.316 OF 1993 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kamareddy for the offence punishable under Sections16(1-A)(i), 7(i) and 2(ia)(f) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.2. The factual matrix that arise for consideration can be briefly stated as follows:-The Food Inspector-PW-1 inspected the shop in the premises of the accused situate at Reddypet village in the presence of Chenna Chiranjeevulu and PW-2-P.Vijaykumar-. At that time, the accused was dealing the business in his shop. PW-1-Food Inspector noticed 50 Kgs of 'Atta' in a gunny bag. He purchased 600 grams of 'Atta' by tendering amount to the accused in the presence of mediators and thereafter issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the Act expressing his intention for sending sample for analysis. Thereupon, the sample was taken after following the prescribed procedure and sent to the Public Analyst. The Publ...
P. Yeshodamma and ors. Vs. T. Buchi Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: II(2004)ACC299; 2006ACJ414; 2004(2)ALD894
Ghulam Mohammed, J.1. The United India Insurance Company Limited preferred this appeal against the order dated 19-4-2001 in OP No. 1611 of 1997 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Hyderabad, granting compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/-on account of the death of P. Narayana Reddy.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 27-8-1977 P. Narayana Reddy was going on foot to the house of one P. Venkat Reddy and when he reached Dindi Cross Roads near Check post, one Scooter bearing No. A.P.24C-9625 was driven in a rash and negligent manner resulting in the accident. The deceased having sustained fracture on the head in the said accident, was admitted in the Government Hospital, Devarkonda, and he died later. The wife and children of the deceased filed the above OP claiming compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- from the owners and insurer of the scooter involved in the accident.3. The first respondent-owner has not filed counter, but the second respondent filed counter denying the accident, re...
Kasarabada Rajeswara Rao and Etc. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2004
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD(Cri)418; 2004CriLJ1836
Bilal Nazki, J.1. These petitions have been filed by different persons who are accused in different cases for quashing the proceedings in terms of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Charge-sheets were filed against the accused persons for having committed offences punishable under Section 7(1) of the Essential Commodities Act r/w. Sections 26 and 28 of the A.P. Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Act, 1980 and Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. They were also accused of having committed offences under Sections 120B, 407, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 474 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The contention of the petitioners before the learned Single Judge of this Court appears to have been that a Special Court constituted under the provisions of Section 12A of the Essential Commodities Act cannot try the cases involving offences under Indian Penal Code along with offences under the Essential Commodities Act. After noting down various judgments the learned sing...
Narender Gopal Baldwa and ors. Vs. Director, Town and Country Planning ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD191
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two writ petitions arise under similar factual and legal background. The array of respondents is same in both the writ petitions. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order.2. Petitioners in WP. No. 25474 of 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the '1st writ petition') are the owners of Ac. 17-29 guntas of land in Sy.Nos. 79/A, 79/A2 and 80/A of Thimmapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Mehboobnagar District. Petitioner in W.P. No. 25476 of 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the 2nd 'writ petition') is a partnership concern and it owns land in Sy.Nos. 64 to 71, partly in some and fully in others. Petitioners in both the writ petitions intended to develop the lands for non-agricultural purpose. They submitted applications to the District Collector, Mehboobnagar District, the 3rd respondent herein, seeking permission to convert the land to non-agricultural purpose. They also applied to the Gram Panchayat, Kothur, for sanction of layout.3. The Gram Sabha of K...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »