Andhra Pradesh Court January 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anjuman-e-aaalavi Shia Imamia Ithna-e-ashari (Akhbari) Vs. A.P. State ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: AIR2004AP151; 2004(2)ALD142; 2004(3)ALT595
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The dispute raised in this writ petition has long chequered history. Petitioner is a society registered under Societies Act espousing the cause of Muslims known as Akhbari community (a sub-sect of Shia muslims). It is their case that at or about the construction of Ibadath Khana-e-Hussaini Darulshifa, Hyderabad founders created a wakfhama under which Muslims belonging to Akhbari community have a right to have a separate congregation to offer prayers on Holy days and that they can have the prayers led by their own Peshe-e-Namaaz (Priest leading namazis). They have been agitating for such right before A.P. State Wakf Board, first respondent herein as well as this Court.2. To be brief, they filed writ petition being W.P. No. 6162 of 1999 before this Court to permit the members of the sect to perform prayers led by their own Priest. The writ petition was disposed of giving such permission. In the same writ petition, this Court on 28.3.1999 modified earlier order fixin...
Nimmaka Jaya Raju Vs. Satrucharla Vijaya Rama Raju and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD157; 2004(4)ALT14
G. Yethirajulu, J.Introduction:1. This election petition is filed under Sections 5, 100(1)(d)(i) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 ('the Act' for brevity) by an unsuccessful candidate of the Legislative Assembly Elections, 1999 to declare the election of the first respondent as Member of the Legislative Assembly from 8 Naguru (Scheduled Tribe) Assembly Constituency as void, to set aside the same and to declare him as duly elected to the said Assembly Constituency.Pleadings :2. The averments of the petition are briefly as follows:3. The petitioner belongs to Jatapu tribe, which is including in the list of Scheduled Tribes (STs). The election to the 8 Naguru (ST) Legislative Assembly Constituency was held on 11-9-1999. It is a reserved constituency for Scheduled Tribes. In the said election, the petitioner and the first respondent contested as Telugu Desam Parry (TDP) and Congress-I Party candidates. The Respondents 2 to 4 contested from other parties. The first respondent was de...
D. Vidya Sagar Rao and anr. Vs. K. Indira Devi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD426; 2004(2)ALT689
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. The plaintiffs are the respondents and the defendants the petitioners. The parties shall be referred to by the status in the suit.Pleadings in brief as disclosed by record2. The pleadings on record disclose that the plaintiffs and the defendants are claiming to be owning an extent of Acs.4-10 guntas and Acs.10-00 of land in Sy. Nos. 484, 485 and 486 of Bachupally Village, Ranga Reddy District. While the claim of the plaintiffs is based on the sale deed of the year 1967, while that of the defendants, is based on the sale deeds from the year 1993 and onwards. It appears that when the defendants tried to interfere with the possession of the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs filed the suit O.S. No. 239 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, praying to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants, from interfering with their extent of land. While the suit is pending, the plaintiffs moved an application in I.A. No. 2089 of 2001...
Velamala Jagadish Vs. Ippli Haranadha Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)ALD439; IV(2004)BC434
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Chandra Sekhar Rao, Counsel representing the petitioner and Sri Rajasekhar Rao, Counsel representing the respondent.2. The civil revision petition is filed as against an order made in I.A. No. 546/ 2003 in O.S. No. 19/2003 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam.3. The Revision petitioner, defendant in suit O.S. No. 19/2003 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, moved the application IA. No. 546/2003 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 praying for sending the documents - the suit demand promissory note along with signatures of the defendant on Vakalath and written statement, to the Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad for opinion for the reasons which had been specified in the affidavit filed in support of the application. It was stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application that the Revision petitioner/defendant never borrowed any amount and never executed any promissory note a...
Dilip Kumar Vs. the State
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD(Cri)360; 2004CriLJ2202
ORDERDalava Subrahmanyam, J.1. This revision is directed against the judgment in Crl. Appeal No. 223 of 2000 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge dated 13-4-2001 against the order of the Chief Rationing Officer in confirming the confiscation of 30% of the value of the seized stock of rice but setting aside the confiscation of 30% of the seized stocks relating to Basmathi and broken rice in favour of the Government.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :The Inspector of Police, Vigilance Cell surprised M/s. Adarsh Rice Depot located at 10-1-622 Entrenchment Road, East Secunderabad on 21-5-1998 at 2 p.m. and at the time of inspection one D. Dileep Kumar, Proprietor of the said shop was conducting the business and on request he produced the relevant records and the license for verification. The Vigilance staff after verification found that there was variation with regard to essential commodities detailed in the order with the book balance as against the ground balance. T...
Shaik Mullapalli Shamshad Begum and ors. Vs. Public Prosecutor, High C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: II(2004)DMC105
ORDER1. By this application filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek directions to the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa to release them on bail in the event of their appearing before him in connection with Crl. A. No. 1283 of 2003, pending before this Court, which was filed by the State aggrieved by the judgment dated 11.2.2003, passed in S.C. No. 159 of 1999, acquitting them of the offences for which they were tried.2. The petitioners who were tried for the offences under Sections 498A, 302 read with. Section 34, Sections 304B and 201 read with Section 34, I.P.C., were acquitted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, in S.C. No. 159 of 1999, by his judgment dated 11.2.2003, Therefore, the State moved in appeal before this Court in Crl. A. No. 1283 of 2003. This Court, on 17.12.2003, while admitting the criminal appeal ordered issuance of warrants against the petitioners under Section 390, Cr.P.C. and directed the police authorities to produce them before the Principal ...
Shaikh Mullapalli Shamshad Begum and ors. Vs. Public Prosecutor, High ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD(Cri)378; 2004CriLJ3595
ORDER1. By this application filed under Section 482 Cr. P. C., the petitioners seek directions to the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa to release them on bail in the event of their appearing before him in connection with Crl. A. No. 1283 of 2003, pending before this Court, which was filed by the State aggrieved by the judgment dated 11-2-2003, passed in S. C. No. 159 of 1999, acquitting them of the offences for which they were tried.2. The petitioners who were tried for the offences under Section 498A, 302 r/w. Section 34, 304B and 201 r/w. Section 34 I. P. C., were acquitted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, in S. C. No. 159 of 1999, by his judgment dated 11-2-2003. Therefore, the State moved in appeal before this Court in Crl. A. No. 1283 of 2003. This Court, on 17-12-2003, while admitting the criminal appeal ordered issuance of warrants against the petitioners under Section 390 Cr. P. C. and directed the police authorities to produce them before the Principal Sessions Judge, ...
Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches' Association and Ors. Vs. Government o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659
P.S. Narayana, J.1. Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches Association, represented by its President and Convenor Sri Girish Sanghi and others had invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning certain provisions of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and certain Government Orders and Rules by filing W.P. No. 12348/2002. Federation for Empowerment of Local Government by its Presidum Member, Lok Satta by its General Secretary and Dr. Jayaprakash Narayana filed W.P.MP. No. 22300/2003 in W.P. No. 12348/2002 to implead them as Respondents 3 to 5 and in view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application the said W.P.M.P. No. 22300/2003 is allowed and proposed parties are impleaded as Respondents 3 to 5. The contesting parties had put in lengthy pleadings and also placed ample material before the Court in support of their respective contentions. Likewise, Prasanna, Chairperson, District Level Committee, Zilla Parishad, Nalgond...
Y. Chinna Butchi Reddy and ors. Vs. Y. Kesava Madhusudhana Reddy and o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD309; 2004(2)ALT626
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard the Counsel for the petitioners. Despite service of notice, none appeared for the respondents.2. This revision is filed challenging the order and decree dated 4.3.2003 passed by the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur in LA. No. 34/2003 in O.S.No.304/2002. By the impugned order, the Court below allowed the petition filed by the guardian, to come to on record to represent the plaintiffs' as next friend and to make the necessary amendments in the plaint. Aggrieved the same, the defendants in the suit filed this revision petition.3. The brief facts of the case are that the Plaintiffs 1 and 2 filed suit against the defendants for permanent injunction. In the suit, the Plaintiff No. 1 claiming to be the major, represented the 2nd plaintiff who is a minor. The defendants filed written statement and basing on the cause title of the suit, at the outset, contended that since the 1st plaintiff was also a minor as on the date of filing of the suit, the...
Baby Bushra Wadood Vs. Joint Transport Commissioner and Secretary, Reg ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2004
Reported in: II(2004)ACC337; 2004(2)ALD544; 2004(3)ALT357
Motilal B. Naik, J.1. Petitioner is the owner of a goods vehicle bearing Registration No. AP13/V7925. Petitioner's vehicle was engaged by M/s. Lohiya Transport Company, Hyderabad to carry its goods to Nizamabad. When the loaded lorry was about to leave for Nizamabad, two passengers requested the driver to accommodate them in the lorry, as they want to go to Nizamabad for some urgent work. Accordingly, the two passengers were accommodated by the driver in the lorry. On 18.1.2002 the lorry loaded with kirana (grocery) goods was proceeding to Nizamabad. When it reached Bicanur Mandal, these two persons who boarded the lorry, threatened the driver and cleaner with dire consequences and forced them to divert it to a nearby forest area and threw them out from the said vehicle. However, the driver of the lorry could manage to go to Ramayampet Police Station on the next day i.e., 19.1.2002 and lodged a complaint, which was registered as Cr.No. 3 of 2002.2. It is stated the whereabouts of lorry...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »