Andhra Pradesh Court September 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thimmareddypalem Grampanchayat Vs. District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD560
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These writ petitions disclose utter disregard to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act by the District Collector, Prakasam District and Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, (R.D.O.) and the gross misuse of power by the latter in bringing about certain fictitious records and proceedings resulting in multiplicity of proceedings before this Court and a Civil Court.2. The petitioner in W.P. No. 21304 of 2002 is Gram Panchayat of Thimmareddypalem of Lingasamudram Mandal, Prakasam District. An extent of about Acs. 515-00 of land is vested in the Gram Panchayat. The revenue authorities intended to divest the Gram Panchayat of about Acs. 83-00 cents of the said land so as to enable them to assign it to needy persons in the year 1991. The necessary exercise was undertaken under Section 62 of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964.3. In the year 2001, the RDO, initiated steps for denotification of another Acs.77-00 of land for this purpose. He...
Naseem Begum and anr. Vs. S.M. Kaleem
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD292; 2004(1)ALT34
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful defendants in both the Courts below are the appellants and the respondent in the present Second Appeal is the plaintiff. The respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit O.S. No. 577/93 on the file of V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for declaration that he is the absolute owner of plaint schedule property and to evict the appellants/defendants and to deliver vacant possession of the suit schedule house, for past and future mesne profits and costs of the suit. The said suit was resisted by the appellants/defendants by filing a written statement in detail and on the strength of the respective pleadings of the parties, after settlement of Issues, the Court of first instance had recorded the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2 and D.W.1 and D.W.2 and had marked Exs.A-1 to A-45 and after recording the appropriate findings ultimately had decreed the suit. The defendants, aggrieved by the same, had preferred A.S. No. 214/2000 on the file of X Additiona...
Nallagondla Kanthamma Vs. Nallagondala Rajyam and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2003
Reported in: 2004(3)ALD168; 2004(1)ALT450; I(2004)DMC467
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The suit O.S.No. 81/96 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Nandaloor was filed by one Nallagondla Kanthamma against General Manager, Integral Coach Factory, Madras, Chief Personal Officer, Integral Coach Factory, Madras for declaration that she is the legally wedded wife of Nallagondla Penchalaiah who died on 19-6-1996 while working in Integral Coach Factory, Madras and entitled to receive the benefits i.e., Provident Fund, Gratuity, Pension, Leave Salary and other privileges incidental thereto and also for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. The 3rd defendant one Nallagondla Rajyam was impleaded as party by virtue of an order dated 29-6-1998 in I.A. No. 500/96.2. On the respective pleadings of the parties after settlement of issues, P.W.1 and D.W.1 to D.W.6 were examined and Exs.A-1 to A-7 and Exs.B-1 to B-4 were marked. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Nandaloor, on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, had declared that the plaintiff is the lega...
K. Venkateswarlu and Co. Limited Vs. Secretary Irrigation Department, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD18; 2004(3)ALT110
ORDERR. Subhash Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction, to declare the action of the second respondent in withholding a sum of Rs. 19,14,797/- from the bills payable to the petitioner, in respect of the contract work covered by Agreement No. LS/1/AIBP/GVC-IV/1999-2000, dated 30-4-1999, as illegal and arbitrary, and, directions are sought against the respondents to refund the said amount together with interest to the petitioner.2. Necessary facts, in brief, are as follows:The petitioner, a partnership firm, is engaged in the business of civil contracts. A contract relating to earth work, excavation and forming embankment, lining and construction of structures from Km 234.000 to Km 250.360 of Kakatiya main canal was entrusted to the petitioner, by entering into agreement No. ICB/AB-10/88-89, dated 19-12-1988. The said contract work, which was entrusted to the petitioner, was one among the six package works notif...
M. Kesavulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD522
G. Bikshapathy, J. 1. Assailing the validity of G.O. Ms. No. 505 Education Department dated 11.11.1998 and G.O. Ms. No. 538 Education Department dated 26.11.1998, several O.As, were filed by the teachers working in Government Schools and also the Mandal Educational Officers Association. The challenge is made to the alleged Integration of the Services of the teaching staff working in the Government schools with that of the schools under the control of the Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samithies.2. Few facts are necessary to appreciate the matter in a more detailed manner.In the erstwhile Andhra State, all the schools in the State were established by the Government under the control of the Education Department. However, consequent on the formation of Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samithies, the schools which were hitherto maintained by the District Boards in the Andhra area were taken over by the Zilla Parishads along with the staff in 1959. As far as Telangana Area is concerned, prior t...
T. Haribhushana and anr. Vs. T. Venkat Rao (Died) by Lrs.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2003
Reported in: AIR2004AP83; 2003(6)ALD122
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J. 1. This application for transfer of O.S. No. 182 of 1984 on the file of the Court of the III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad to any other Court is filed by defendants 1 and 7 in that suit on the ground that the learned Presiding Officer, without considering the request of their Counsel for adjournment to the next day for completion of the cross-examination of PW2 had forfeited their right to further cross-examine PW2 and so they have some apprehensions. 2. I have gone through the order dated 22-8-2003 whereunder the learned Judge forfeited the right of the petitioners to further cross-examine PW-2 on the ground that their Counsel went into the Court Hall only at about 4:45 p.m., and cross-examined the witness for some time and then sought for adjournment. 3. Since the Counsel for the petitioners in the Trial Court went into the Court hall about 15 minutes before the close of the working hours of the Court when an important witness is to be cr...
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. M. Satyanarayana Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD343
Bilal Nazki, J.1. This is a contempt petition referred to us by the learned Single Judge of this Court as he found that the 1st respondent was guilty of Criminal Contempt.2. The facts which related to initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents are given in detail in the order of reference, but certain facts need to be reproduced. It appears that one Sri P.Rama Subha Reddy is a Minister in the State Cabinet. He is an accused in a case being Sessions Case No. 473 of 1993. This case was pending before the II-Additional Sessions Judge, Mahaboobnagar. Some of the witnesses in that case filed an application in the High Court being Tr. Crl.M.P. No. 2767 of 2002 seeking transfer of the case to any Court outside Mahaboobnagar District. The High Court ordered the transfer of the case from the file of the II-Additional Sessions Judge, Mahaboobnagar to the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. Thereafter a news item appeared in Eenadu Telugu Daily Newspaper on 14.9.2002 w...
Raghavendra Exports and anr. Vs. Nawaker Enterprises and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2003
Reported in: AIR2004AP84; 2004(1)ALD283
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. This petition is filed to transfer the O.S. No. 187 of 2003 pending on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Surat to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Vijayawada.2. Sections 22 and 23 of CPC read as follows:Section 22. Where a suit may be instituted in any one of two or more Courts and is instituted in one of such Courts, any defendant, after notice to the other parties, may, at the earliest possible opportunity and in all cases where issues are settled at or before such settlement, apply to have the suit transferred to another Court, and the Court to which such application is made, after considering the objections of the other parties (if any), shall determine in which of the several Courts having jurisdiction the suit shall proceed.Section 23(1) Where the several Courts having jurisdiction are subordinate to the same Appellate Court, an application under Section 22 shall be made to the Appellate Court.(2) Where such Courts are ...
Pulimala Saidamma and anr. Vs. the State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)714; 2004CriLJ677
Bilal Nazki, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. This is an appeal filed by two accused persons in Sessions Case No. 132 of 1999. They were tried on the basis of allegation that on 10-4-1998 at about mid day they committed murder of one Smt. Pulimala Padma by pouring kerosene over her and setting her ablaze. The deceased Padma was daughter-in-law of A1 and sister-in-law of A2. Charge was framed under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Prosecution examined 15 witnesses and exhibited 18 documents. After trial, they were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.2. P.W. 4 was projected as eye-witness to the occurrence. She is daughter of the deceased who was minor on the date of occurrence. P.Ws. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 were projected as witnesses with respect to certain circumstances. P.W. 8 is a witness to the inquest. P.W.9 is a doctor who treated the deceased in the first instance and ...
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Housing Federation Ltd. Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2003
Reported in: 2008(1)ALT383
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. The writ petition is filed challenging the judgment passed by the Co-operative Tribunal. Hyderabad in CTA No. 269 of 2000 dated 2-7-2001.2. The facts, which are not in dispute are that the petitioner is Society which is involved in business of lending money to other societies. The 1 st respondent, a Co-operative Housing Society, took loan of considerable amount to provide flats to its members. The properties of the 1st respondent have been mortgaged with the petitioner while obtaining the loans, phase-wise. Many of the flats have been constructed and distributed to its members. As per the agreement, the rate of interest is 14.20% and 14.30% per annum and as many as four different mortgage deeds were executed for different properties. At one point, the 1st respondent became defaulter. The petitioner initiated proceedings under the provisions of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act') and proceedings under Section 71 of the Act in order to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »