Andhra Pradesh Court August 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramisetti Srinivasa Rao and ors. Vs. District Collector and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD343; 2004(1)ALT98
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The petitioners, in effect, seek direction to respondents to dispose of Ac.4-37 cents of land in R.S. No. 166/2 in Putrela Village, Vissannapet Mandal, in favour of petitioners at cost price as per the provisions of Paragraph 32 of BSO-90 and as per G.O. Ms. No. 628 dated 19-5-1975.2. The petitioners state that they are the original owners of the said land, which was acquired by the Government for construction of residential quarters for the employees working for Nagarjuna Sagar Project. The petitioners allege that even though the quarters were constructed, no employee occupied the same and the quarters were demolished. The petitioners now seek re-conveyance of the land acquired by the Government as per G.O. Ms. No. 628 dated 19-5-1975. It is also alleged that the acquired land was kept idle by the Government without using it for any purpose. The petitioners made representation to the authority seeking re-conveyance of the land at cost price by invoking parag...
Anju Kumar Agarwal and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD294
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The petitioners seek the relief of quashing of FIR dated 19-10-2001 in Cr.No. 496 of 2001 on the file of the Central Crime Station, Hyderabad. The facts relevant for the purpose of this case may be stated as under: 2. Petitioners 1 and 2 are Directors of M/s. DRS Transport (P) Limited, undertaking the activity of goods transport. For the sake of brevity, M/s. DRS Transport (P) Limited is referred to as 'the Company' is referred to as 'DRS Transport'. Its registered office is at Hyderabad. The Company has undertaken transport of the goods entrusted to it by M/s. Videocon International Limited and M/s. Videocon Appliances Limited, to various places under the concerned invoices. 3. On 11-10-2001, M/s. Videocon Export Limited, the 2nd respondent herein, booked certain goods with the Company, for being transported from Ahmednagar to Hyderabad and Vijayawada under Consignment Nos. 0099708 and 0099709. The goods were valued at Rs. 19,61,007/-. On 13-10-2001, the...
Ntr University of Health Sciences and ors. Vs. Dr. A. Raj Karan Reddy ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD128; 2003(5)ALT435
C.V. Ramulu, J. 1. All these writ appeals are filed against the order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 20716 of 2001, dated 23-1-2002 and as such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.The facts, in brief, are as follows:2. The parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed in the writ petition.3. The above writ petition was filed to set aside the admissions into Postgraduate Medical Courses in Osmania/Kakatiya areas Medical Colleges for the academic year 2001-02 as violative of the Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions) Order, 1977 (for short 'the Presidential Order') and consequently, to direct the respondent-University to make admissions in accordance with the Presidential Order duly reserving 85% of the seats in each College in Osmania University and Kakatiya University area Medical Colleges for the academic year 2001-02. Writ petitioners pleaded that providing of seats by the respondent-University in unres...
Mandala Appa Rao and anr. Vs. Pinninti Sreedevi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD162; 2003(5)ALT806; II(2004)BC282
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Defendants in O.S. No. 99 of 1983 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Rajahmundry are the appellants.2. Respondent filed the above suit against the appellants for recovery of Rs. 11,828/- being the principal and interest due under the promissory note dated 10.9.1980 executed by them in favour of Jyosyula Dakshayani for Rs. 8,000/- which was transferred for consideration in her favour on 12.2.1983. The case of the appellant is that he did not borrow the amount covered by the suit promissory note and that in fact they borrowed only Rs. 5,000/- from Dakshayani on 1.9.1980 and executed a registered mortgage bond in her favour and that the suit promissory note must have been brought into existence by using of the blank stamped papers on which they had signed at the time of execution of the mortgage bond in favour of Daksahyani since it was stated that those papers would be returned to them when the mortgage debt is discharged. When Dakshayani sent a notice demanding ...
Pudi Balraju Vs. Jallu Annapoorna
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD257
ORDERB. Sundershan Reddy, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 38 of 2000 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Narasannapeta is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition directed against the order dated 26th March, 2002 made in O.S. No. 38 of 2000 by the learned Judge overruling the objection raised by the petitioner-plaintiff as to the admissibility of un-registered partition deed dated 19-1-1985 filed by the respondent-defendant during the course of cross-examination of PW1.2. During the course of cross-examination of PW1, he was confronted with a document dated 19-1-1985. PW1 readily admitted his signature on the said document dated 19-1-1985. The counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff, however, raised an objection contending that the said document cannot be marked as the same is insufficiently stamped and is not registered. The learned Judge upon perusal of the recitals of the said document found the same to be a deed of partition. There is no dispute whatsoever that the sai...
Narender Vs. Secretary, Municipal Administration and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD448
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner alleging to be the owner of land admeasuring 787 Sq.yds. in Ward No. 13, Jiyaguda, Hyderabad, filed the writ petition praying this Court for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents namely, Government of Andhra Pradesh in Municipal Administration Department, Commissioner and Special Officer, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) and Superintending Executive Engineer (G), MCH, in taking possession of his land without following any procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act) as illegal and arbitrary. He also seeks a consequential direction to the respondents to restore the land or pay compensation to him.2. The case of the petitioner in brief is as under. According to him, the land in question was sold by one Mohd. Layak Ali Khan to Laxmanji who is his grandfather in 1959 by a registered sale deed dated 8-8-1959, Laxmanji bequeathed the property on 26-12-1974 in favour of the petitioner. By that date, the petitioner w...
Tirumala Balaji Wines and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition and Exc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD479
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The four petitioners were granted licence in Form IL-24 under A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 (hereafter called the Rules') during the year 1998-99. The licences are being renewed from time to time. According to the petitioners, population of Dhone village as per 2001 census is 46,611 and, therefore, as per Rule 25 of the Rules, the licence fee to be paid is Rs. 4,50,000/- per annum. The respondents, however, reckoned the population of other villages namely, Dharmavaram, Dhorapalli, Gosanipalli, Yerraguntla and Venkatanayunipalli, as population of Dhone village on the ground that these are the hamlets of Dhone and demanded licence fee of Rs. 8,25,000/- per annum at the time of renewal of licence for the excise year 2002-2003. The petitioners along with others filed W.P. No. 5663 of 2002 seeking appropriate declaration. The said writ petition was dismissed by this Court. In the meanwhile, the District Collector, Kurnool, published a notification i...
Kuruva Mekala Eranna (A2) and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)860; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)426; 2004CriLJ1109
K.C. Bhanu, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment, dated 16-3-2001, in Sessions Case No. 48/1998 on the file of the learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool.2. Fifteen accused persons stood charged firstly under Section 148, I.P.C., secondly under Section 302, I.P.C. for causing the murder of R. Sudarshan Reddi (D1); thirdly A9 stood charged under Section 326, I.P.C. for causing grievous hurt to P.W. 3, fourthly A1 to A8 and A10 to A15 under Section 326 read with Section 149, I.P.C. for causing grievous hurt to P.W. 3, fifthly A1 to A15 under Section 449, I.P.C., and sixthly A1 to A15 stood charged under Section 302, I.P.C. for causing the death of Suryakanta Reddi (D2). Before the commencement of trial, A1 died and, therefore, the case against him abated. On appreciation of the evidence, the learned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused as follows-- A2 to A15 to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 148, I.P.C., A2 to A15 to suffe...
Kamala Muniratnam and anr. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)403; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)372; 2003CriLJ4782
K.C. Bhanu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment, dated 16-7-2001, in Sessions Case No. 98/2000 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupati, whereby the accused therein were convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302, rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 120-B and rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, with a direction to run the sentences concurrently.2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows. The deceased Mangamma is the wife of Al. Two or three days prior to 12-6-1999 the deceased informed P.Ws. 1 and 2 that A1 threated to kill her. They promised the deceased that they would enquire with A1. Thereafter, for three days the deceased was not seen. Then P.W. 1 sent P.W. 2 to enquire with the parents of Al. The parents of A1 informed P.W. 2 that the deceased went to her parents' house. P.Ws. 1 and 2 caused enquiry with the paren...
Shaik Iqbal John Vs. Shaik Khader Basha and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)385; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)482; II(2004)DMC454
K.C. Bhanu, J.1. While the appeal is filed by the State, the revision is filed by P.W. 2 in C.C. No. 203/1998, dated 9.9.1999, on the file of the II Additional judicial I Class, Magistrate, Cuddapah, Since both the cases arise out of the same case, they are disposed of by a common judgment.2. Smt. Shaik Mumtaj Begum lodged a report with the police alleging that at the time of her marriage with A-1, a sum of Rs. 10,000/- a Godrej cot, an almirah, and some household articles besides some gold ornaments were given to A-1. After she joined her matrimonial home, A-1 to A-6 started harassing her to bring additional dowry and unable to bear the harassment, she came back to her parent's house, After completion of investigation, the police filed a charge-sheet which was registered as C.C. No. 203/1998. Charges under Section 498-A, IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act were framed. The accused denied their guilt. On behalf of the Prosecution six witnesses were examined and two do...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »