Andhra Pradesh Court June 2003 Judgments
P. Bhaskar Vs. Asst. General Manager, Syndicate Bank Zonal Office and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD776; 2003(6)ALT233; (2003)IIILLJ1143AP
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard both the sides.Since the issue involved in the writ petitions is connected and the parties are common, I am disposing of both the writ petitions by this common order. Further since the contempt case also depends on the outcome of the writ petitions, it is also being disposed of by this common order.2. W.P. No. 8856/1995 is filed by the workman challenging the award passed by the 2nd respondent -Tribunal in I.D.No. 41/ 1991 dated 28.9.1994, in denying the back wages while granting reinstatement with continuity of service.3. W.P. No. 9552/1995 is filed by the Management - Syndicate Bank questioning the very same award of the Tribunal in granting reinstatement with continuity of service.4. This Court by order dated 19.4.2001 in WPMRNo. 9517/2001 in W.P. No. 9552/1995 modified the earlier interim order dated 5.2.1996 and directed that the petitioner shall be paid dearness allowance at the increased rates from time to time including other allowances as per Sect...
Tag this Judgment!Property Association of Baptist Churches Vs. Sub-registrar and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD671; 2004(1)ALT174
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. The petitioner-society challenges the action of the 1st respondent in registering the documents in survey Nos.87, 88 and 89 at Preston Institute, Jangaon, Warangal district, contrary to the Registration Act, 1908 (for brevity 'the Act, 1908'). 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the land in survey Nos.87, 88, 89, 146, 158, 159 and 160 situate at Jangaon stands in the name of Rev, Rutherford and Rev. Unruh and who subsequently transferred the land in the name of the petitioner-society in the year 1975-76. The petitioner established schools, hostels, church, hospitals and constructed a compound wall called as 'Preston Institute'. The machineries, which purchased the property, left India and the petitioner-society is administering the property since 1975. The petitioner-society came to know that the property was again mutated during the year 1994-95 in the name of M/s. American Baptist Foreign Mission Society, U.S.A. After coming to know this, the petitioner-so...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Kusumatai Dandekar Vs. Bhoopathi Rajeshwari and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD239
ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J.1. The petitioner in this revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the judgment in O.P. No. 2 of 2000 dated 11.11.2000 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Adilabad, returning the application filed by the petitioner under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act for presentation before the appropriate Court for disposal.2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is the mother of the deceased Satyakam Dendekar, who died on 5.11.1996 in the hands of the extremists at Mancherial Town, whereupon the District Collector had announced an ex-gratia Rs. 1,00,000/-. Since deceased was unmarried and he had no wife and children and the father of the deceased Sathyakam Dandekar also died, the petitioner being only the dependent of the deceased filed the application.3. The respondents 1 to 3 are also claiming as wife and children of late Satyakam Dandekar, though the said fact was denied by the petitioner.4. After regular contest by bo...
Tag this Judgment!Land Acquisition Officer-cum-tahsildar Vs. Sharfudding and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALD143; 2003(5)ALT314
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Tahsildar, Pargi is the appellant in this appeal preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') against the order and decree dated 31-10-1986 made in O.P.No. 226 of 1985 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Vikarabad.2. That an extent of Ac.1-21 guntas of land in Survey No. 56 and Ac.1-18 guntas of land in Survey No. 114 of Syed Malkapur village were acquired for the purpose of providing house-sites to the weaker sections of the society under draft notification published in the District Gazettee on 8-6-1978. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 1,500/- per acre.3. The Land Acquisition Officer, during the course of enquiry, found that Survey Nos. 56 and 114 are classified as Kidmati Inams and the Kathedars thereof were Syed Maqdum Moinuddin and Sharfoddin; that Maqdum Moinuddin died and that his son Nizamoddin is shown as half shareholder. They are the re...
Tag this Judgment!Lagadapati Venkaiah Vs. Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-election Trib ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD546; 2003(5)ALT551
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.3.2002 passed by the 1st respondent in LA. No. 999 of 2001 in O.P. No. 5 of 2001 and consequently seeks a direction to the respondent to restore the O.P. to its file.2. A few facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are as follows:3. Pursuant to the election notification issued on 1.8.2001, the petitioner and the, respondents 2 to 4 have filed nominations to the post of Sarpanch and their nominations were declared as valid. The election -was held on 14.8.2001 and the 2nd respondent was declared as elected to the post of Sarpanch of the village. Aggrieved by the declaration of election, the petitioner filed O.P.No. 5 of 2001 under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election Tribunals in respect of Gram Panchayats, Mandal Parishads and Zilla Parishads) Rules, 1995, (for short 'the Rules'), before the Election Tribunal-cum-Junior Civil Judge, Parchur to declare the election...
Tag this Judgment!Md. Ahmed Ali and ors. Vs. Alastu Talimi Trust and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD99; 2003(6)ALT594
G. Yethirajulu, J. 1. These second appeals are preferred by the tenants of various premises of a Wakf against the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court confirming the eviction order passed by the Civil Court.2. S.A. No. 372 of 1999 is preferred by the defendant in O.S. No. 4712 of 1991. He was the tenant of the suit mulgi situated at Charminar, Hyderabad on a monthly rent of Rs. 50/-. He committed default in payment of rent for a period of seven (7) months i.e., from 1-4-1989 to 30-10-1989.3. S.A. No. 373 of 1999 is preferred by the defendant in the suit. He was the tenant of the suit mulgi situated at Charminar, Hyderabad taken on a rent of Rs. 50/- p.m. He committed default in payment of the rent for 20 months from 1-9-1987 to 31-7-1989.4. The appellant in S.A.No. 374 of 1999 is the defendant in O.S. No. 4720 of 1991, He is the tenant of the suit mulgi at Charminar, Hyderabad, on a monthly rent of Rs. 30/-. He committed default in payment of rent for a period of eight (8) ...
Tag this Judgment!Satyanarayana T. Vs. Chairman and P.O., Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: 2003(5)ALT599; (2004)ILLJ272AP
G. Bikshapathy, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 26765 of 2001, dated December 31, 2001, confirming the award passed by the Tribunal in I.D. No. 11 of 1999.2. The petitioner is the appellant. He was a conductor employed in A.P.S.R.T.C. On January 24, 1988, bus was checked by the inspecting staff and then it was found that he issued unconnected tickets to two passengers at the rate of Rs. 2.50 paise each. Apart from that, he was also found having 94 unconnected tickets. Therefore, charge-sheet was issued and enquiry was conducted and ultimately, he was removed from service.3. Thereupon, he raised an industrial dispute in I.D.No. 111 of 1999 before the Labour Court. The counsel for the appellant filed a memo before the Labour Court stating that he is not challenging the enquiry proceedings and he was only inclined to argue on the quantum of punishment under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act. Accordingly, the Labour Court,...
Tag this Judgment!Kavitha Goud Vs. Nookala Sudarshan Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: AIR2004AP326; 2004(4)ALD324; 2004(5)ALT293
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Quondam minor plaintiff in O.S. No. 924 of 1984 on the file of the Court of IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad is the appellant. The suit was filed on her behalf by her father and guardian, inter alia for the relief of possession of the plaint schedule property, which is a house bearing No. 3-4-495/1 at Barkatpura, Hyderabad in approximately 1,147 Sq.Yds., within the boundaries mentioned in the schedule appended to the plaint (hereinafter referred to as 'the suit property'), which earlier was a part of the house bearing No. 3-4-495, after ejecting the respondents therefrom and for past and future mesne profits. For the sake of convenience the parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the Trial Court.2. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, in the amended plaint is, second defendant is the son of the first defendant, who is the son of the third defendant. Fourth defendant is a tenant in respect of a part of the suit property. Thir...
Tag this Judgment!P. Mallikarjuna Rao Vs. Mecon India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALT83
C.V. Ramulu, J.1. In these two Writ Petitions the parties are one and the same and they are interconnected. Hence, they are being disposed of by this common Judgment.2. Writ Petition No. 29055 of 1995 is filed seeking a Mandamus directing the respondents to grant the scale of pay and allowances and other benefits on par with other employees in the cadre of Assistant from P.R.C. 1989, while Writ Petition No. 2'784 of 2001 is filed for a Mandamus directing the respondents to absorb the petitioner in service as Assistant/Typist/ TTOT from the date of Judgment in Writ Petition No. 16903 of 1989 i.e. 11-7-1991 and to pay all consequential benefits.3. The facts in both the cases are similar. As such, the facts as stated in Writ Petition No. 2784 of 2001 are as under:According to the petitioner, he had passed B. Com. degree and Typewriting Higher Grade and appeared for an interview for the post of Assistant/Typist in the respondent-organization having been sponsored by the Employment Exchange...
Tag this Judgment!P. Rameswara Rao Vs. I. Sanjeeva Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2003
Reported in: AIR2004AP117; 2003(5)ALD564; 2003(5)ALT697
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Unsuccessful Plaintiff in O.S. No. 59 of 1988 on the file of the Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Kurnool in the Trial Court and before a learned Single Judge of this Court, preferred this Letters Patent Appeal. For the sake of convenience the parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the Trial Court.2. The case, in brief, of the plaintiff is that his adoptive father P. Subrahmanyamaiah delivered possession of the plaint schedule property to his widowed daughter-in-law Venkamma for her maintenance under Ex.B.1 registered deed dated 26.4.1928 with a condition that it should revert to him after her lifetime, and so consequent on the death of Venkamma he became the owner of the plaint schedule property as his adoptive father predeceased Venkamma, more so because he has been in continuous possession of the plaint schedule property and is enjoying the usufruct therefrom and is paying maintenance of Rs. 300/- per annum to Venkamma as agreed to...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »