Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court May 2003 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 01 2003

K. Krishna Mohan Rao and ors. Vs. Sunil Arora, Managing Director, Indi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: May-01-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)ALD493; 2003(4)ALT292

G. Yethirajulu, J 1. This contempt case is filed by the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 6760 of 2001 and the respondents in Writ Appeal No. 1433 of 2001.2. During the years 1969 to 1971 the petitioners were appointed as Office Assistants and posted to work in the Support Sections of the Engineering Department of Indian Airlines. As per the second report of the Organisation and the Systems Group (OSG) dated 30-1-1975 the cadres of Technical Assistants, Senior Technical Assistants and Assistant Technical Officers were introduced. On 3-2-1976 the Director of Engineering accepted the said OSG recommendations by prescribing qualifications for the persons eligible to be appointed for those posts. The writ petitioners were appointed as Technical Assistants in the Support Sections of the Engineering Department after passing the required qualifying test, in pursuance of a notification dated 2-4-1976 issued by the then Chief Engineering Manager by prescribing the qualifications, experience and ...


May 01 2003

T.A. Choudhary Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: May-01-2003

Reported in: 2004(3)ALD357

G. Bikshapathy, J.1. All the CMAs, and CRP can be disposed of by a common judgment as they arise out of an award passed by the learned Arbitrator dated 30-9-1991.2. The facts culminating in the present cases are traced out as follows:For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as the department and the Contractor respectively.3. The Contractor entered into an agreement with the department for the works forming approaches to the R&B; in M.18/4 of Guntur-Repalle Road (K.M.06 of Nidubrole-Govada Road) in Ponnur Municipal limits including the formation of the service roads on either side of the overbridge of Nidubrole in lieu of level crossing No. 267 of Vijayawada-Gudur Section in Guntur District.4. Agreement was entered on 27-11-1978 between the parties and the time for completion of the work was fixed at 15 months from the date of handing over the site. According to the department, the site was handed over on 27-11-1978, but the work was completed only by the en...


May 01 2003

Saithana Nageswara Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: May-01-2003

Reported in: 2003(5)ALT24

G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This is a writ of Mandamus filed by 20 petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a direction to the respondents not to evict them from the lands of the 2nd respondent in which they are in possession as cultivating tenants and to strike down Section 6 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 27 of 2002) (hereinafter referred to as 'Act 27 of 2002' for the sake of brevity) and Section 3 of the A.P. Tenancy Laws (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act No. 28 of 2002) (hereinafter referred to as 'Act 28 of 2002} as illegal, unconstitutional and arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.2. The averments of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition are briefly as follows:3. The second respondent is a charitable institution. It is the absolute owner of Ac. 119-84 cents of land situated in Virivada Village and Ac. 2-24 cents in Fakruddinpalem Village of Pithapur...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial