Andhra Pradesh Court April 2003 Judgments
Chella Chenchaiah Vs. Commissioner, Office of the Chief Commissioner o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD10
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner who is a son of one Chinnabba of Venugopalapuram in Chittoor District assails the order of the first respondent bearing No. P3/1205/2001, dated 30-12-2002 ('the impugned order' for brevity). Be it noted, the impugned order came to be passed by the first respondent in exercise of powers under Section 7(d) of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Abolition of Estates and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1948 (hereafater called 'the Act') rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of ryotwari patta in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.9.90 cents in R.S. No. 408/5 and an extent of Acs.18.60 cents in R.S. No. 409 of Renigunta village (hereafter called 'the subject land') which initially formed part of Srikalahasthi zamin estate. 2. The petitioner's father Chinnabba claimed to have been inducted in possession of the subject land in P. Nos. 1169 and 1109. According to the petitioner, the lands situated at Venugopalapuram village, hamlet of Kankambandi Reven...
Tag this Judgment!E. Ravinder Vs. Chairman-cum-managing Director, Power Grid Corporation ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD87; 2003(6)ALT146
ORDERR. Subhash Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus, to issue directions to the respondents to provide employment to the petitioner herein on compassionate grounds, by setting aside the order of rejection passed by the respondents. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that his late father was working as driver in the respondent organization, and he died on 4-5-2000 while he was in service. As such, it is his case that, earlier his mother made representation requesting for appointment on compassionate grounds either for herself or for her eligible children and the same was rejected on 5-2-2001. Thereafter the petitioner, who is the eldest son, has also made representation, pursuant to which, the impugned rejection orders are passed on 11-9-2001. Even thereafter, a legal notice was issued on behalf of the petitioner to the respondents and the same was duly replied by recording reasons by proceedings dated 3140-2002. It is the case of the petitioner that the re...
Tag this Judgment!B. Veera Reddy Vs. A.P. State Warehousing Corporation and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD81
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner is employed as Technical Assistant, Grade-III in the A.P. State Warehousing Corporation, the 1st respondent herein. His services were terminated through proceedings dated 15.6.2002. The reasons stated therein were that in spite of notice having been published in local Daily dated 25.5.2002, requiring him to report duty on or before 28.5.2002, the petitioner did not turn up. The impugned order was issued in exercise of power under Regulation 12 (3) of A.P, Warehousing Corporation Employees Regulations (for short 'the Regulations') and three months salary in lieu of three months notice was paid to the petitioner.2. The petitioner initially challenged the order of termination by filing W.P. No. 12441 of 2002. The writ petition was disposed of through orders dated 11.7.2002 directing the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal, provided for under the Regulations. The petitioner had preferred an appeal to the Board of Directors. Through orders ...
Tag this Judgment!Kasa Venkata Reddy Vs. Syed Basha and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD210
ORDERDalava Subrahmanyam, J. 1. The revision petitioner filed the revision against the order dated 6.7.2000 passed in I.P. No. 4 of 1998 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur in adjudging the petitioner Syed Basha as insolvent.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:Syed Basha filed I.P No. 4 of 1998 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur praying to adjudge him as insolvent under the provisions of the Provincial Insolvency Act (for short 'the Act') contending that he was running a welding shop at Proddatur and he incurred heavy debts. While doing welding work his eye sight was affected and therefore he sold away his machinery and at present he was doing brokerage in selling the engine parts and motors and getting a sum of Rs. 30/- or Rs. 40/- per day. Though he had no sufficient means to maintain his family, the revision petitioner, who was first respondent in I.P No. 4 of 1998, filed execution petition and obtained orders of arrest in E.P.No. 27 of 1995 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Ministry of Defence, Senior Accounts Officer, Department of Administra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD251
Bilal Nazki, J.1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the Union of India challenging the order of the Tribunal passed in O.A. No. 1088 of 2001 dated 1-8-2001. The case of the respondent-applicant before the Tribunal was that her husband was enrolled on 24-9-1965 in the Indian Army. He died while in service on 15-4-1987. She made several representations to respondent No. 2 in the O.A (2nd petitioner) for family pension and other pensionary benefits. The representations had been rejected stating that her husband had deserted the Army and his services had been terminated with effect from 2-5-1987. The Tribunal found that, since the applicant's husband had not been dismissed from service while he was alive and an order of dismissal had been passed after his death therefore he is presumed to have been in service on the date of his death. This order has been challenged in Writ Petition.2. Though there is dispute with regard to the date of death of husband of the respondent, but it is not di...
Tag this Judgment!Radhakrishna Murthy and ors. Vs. Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquis ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD500; 2003(4)ALT576
C.V. Ramulu, J 1. C.M.P. No. 3943 of 2003 is filed to condone the delay of 978 days in filing the Review C.M.P. (SR) No. 10607 of 2003 to review the judgment and Decree dated 31-3-2000 passed by this Court in A.S. No. 1002 of 1997 only to the extent of holding 'however, it is made clear that the claimants are not entitled to interest on additional market value and solatium'.2. Before going to merits of the case, it is necessary to note a brief history of the case.3. A.S. No. 1002 of 1997 was disposed of on 31-3-2000 fixing the market value for the acquired lands at Rs. 40/- per square yard and awarding statutory benefits as provided under the Act 68 of 1984. However, it was made clear that the claimants are not entitled to interest on additional market value and solatium. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the claimants-review petitioners have filed S.L.P.No. 5922-5923(C) of 2002 before the Supreme Court. The same was dismissed on 6-9-2002 and the Court made the following order:'There is ...
Tag this Judgment!Gadamsetty Sriramulu Vs. Assistant Director of Agriculture
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)4; 2003CriLJ3352
ORDERS.R.K. Prasad, J. The petitioner who is accused No. 1 invokes the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C. and seeks for quashing of the proceedings in STC 5 of 2001 on the file of Additional Munsif Magistrate Court, Kandukur, Prakasam District, on the sole ground that the complaint is barred by limitation. The charge-sheet was laid against the petitioner for the alleged substandard seeds found exhibited for sale and the Seeds Inspector visited the premises on 19-9-2000 and sent the sample for analysis which indicated that they were of substandard. The petitioner is said to be the first offender. The attention of this Court has drawn by the learned Counsel for the petitioner to Section 19(a)(i) of Seeds Act, 1966. Section 19(a)(i) reads as follows :19. Penalty.-- If any person--(a) contravenes any provision of this act or any rule made thereunder; or(b) prevents a Seed Inspector from takingsample under this Act; or(c) prevents a Seed Inspector from exercising any o...
Tag this Judgment!P.S. Bheemeswara Rao Vs. Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Educa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALT333
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a junior lecturer in History in Andhra Kesari Tanguturi Prakasam Satajayanthi Junior College, Dumpagadapa, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District, (hereinafter referred to as 'The College') vide proceedings dated 14-11-1973 of the President and Correspondent. His date of birth was recorded in the service register as 18-1-1943 on the basis of the date of birth as entered in the S.S.L.C. register. He studied S.S.L.C. in R.C.M. Elementary School, Palaconda, Srikakulam District. According to the petitioner, his actual date of birth was 18-4-1945 and on account of a clerical mistake it was entered as 18-1-1943.2. The petitioner states that he made representation as early as on 8-12-1973 to the Director, School Education, Government of A.P., Hyderabad for correction of the date of birth and that after prolonged correspondence, the correction was made in the S.S.L.C. register. He filed this writ petition seeking a declaration that the ...
Tag this Judgment!B. Sunderji Vs. M. Anjaneyulu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)58; 2003CriLJ3783
ORDERS.R.K. Prasad, J. 1. The de facto complainant, petitioner herein, files this criminal revision case against the judgment in C.C. No. 216 of 1999 dated 28.2.2001 on the ground of perversity and miscarriage of justice and for disbelieving the ocular evidence, which is supported by medical evidence and other witnesses. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contends that there is material to show that the incident took place and the same is corroborated by P.W.2, who was a farm servant, and also supported by medical evidence. He contends that the judgment of the court below is perverse and the findings are to be set aside. 3. The leaned counsel for the accused, who are respondents 1 to 3, contends that the versions are not supported by medical evidence and P.W.2 is only farm servant who is interested in P.W.1 and the incident has never happened. It is also contended by the learned counsel that the father and brother of P.W.1 are not examined in respect of the incident that ...
Tag this Judgment!T. Satyanarayana Vs. A.P. Residential Educational Institutions Society ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD52; 2003(5)ALT47
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In this batch of writ petitions, the transfer of the respective petitioners to the A.P. Tribal Welfare Residential Education Institution Society is challenged. The factual and legal aspects involved in this batch of writ petitions are one and the same. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment. Briefly stated, the relevant facts are as under:-- 2. In the year 1975, the Government of Andhra Pradesh constituted the A.P. Residential Educational Institutions Society, under the A.P. Public Societies Registration Act, with an object of establishing residential educational institutions in various parts of the State, with special emphasis on rural and tribal areas. By the year 1998, it has established 147 residential educational institutions, including 13 Junior Colleges. 3. With a view to concentrate on quality education among the tribal people, the Government had decided to form a separate society to establish and manage residential educational institutio...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »