Andhra Pradesh Court December 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Ammonium Nitrate Manufacturers Association and anr. Vs. Union o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD164; 2004(1)ALT306
Devinder Gupta, C.J.1. This writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation has been filed by two petitioners. First petitioner claims to be an Association of Indian Ammonium Nitrate ., a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of Fertilizers and Ammonium Nitrate in the country.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the Respondents 1 to 12 in failing to prevent the alleged clandestine imports of Ammonium Nitrate of explosive grade in bulk. Petitioners have alleged that Respondents 13 to 15 and other importers and explosive manufacturers are importing Ammonium Nitrate of Explosive Grade in bulk clandestinely by declaring the same to be a Fertilizer Grade, which is in breach of directions issued by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board. They are also violating the provisions of Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Tariff Act and the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985, issued under the Essential Commodities Act.3. Petitioners claim that the Fertil...
Singamsetty Siva Suryanarayana Murthy (Died) Per Lrs. Vs. Prapancham S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD883
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 29.10.1999 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, in R.C.C.M.A. No. 87 of 1992. The Petitioners 2 to 6 are the legal heirs of the first petitioner who since died.2. The first petitioner was the owner of the premises in question. The father of the respondent was inducted as a tenant thereof who used to run a coffee hotel business therein. After his demise, the respondent continued as a tenant agreeing to pay a monthly rent of Rs. 35/- exclusive of water, latrine and electricity charges. The respondent has been using the premises in question for residential as well as non-residential purposes. The demised premises is situate in a prominent busy and business locality. It comprises of a big hall, a varandah with zinc sheet roofing and appurtenant site. On the premises that the respondent committed wilful default in paying the rents from January 1986 onwards and the, first p...
Hyderabad Cricket Association and anr. Vs. Gunrocck Cricket Club Offic ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Reported in: 2004(5)ALD72; 2004(5)ALT808
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Hyderabad Cricket Association represented by its Honourary Secretary, the Executive Committee represented by its President-cum-Chairman, Hyderabad Cricket Association, had preferred Civil Revision Petition Nos. 2198 of 2002 and 2199 of 2002 against the common order dated 1-5-2002, made in O.P. Nos. 549 of 1998 and 550 of 1998 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The respondent in C.R.P. No. 2198 of 2002 is the Gunrock Cricket Club and the respondent in C.R.P. No. 2199 of 2002 is the Picket Cricket Club. At the outset, it is brought to my notice that these two clubs, Gunrock Cricket Club and Picket Cricket Club, arrayed as respondents in these civil revision petitions, are un-registered clubs. O.P. Nos. 549 of 1998 and 550 of 1998 were filed by Gunrock Cricket Club and Picket Cricket Club respectively, as against the respondents, the revision petitioners herein, under Section 11 of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration A...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Laxmanna (Died) by Lrs.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Reported in: II(2005)ACC228; 2005ACJ1532; 2004(4)ALD732; 2004(5)ALT398
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The Insurer is the appellant. First respondent-claimant filed a claim petition claiming compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor accident that occurred on account of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the tractor owned by sixth respondent herein. During the pendency of claim petition, the first respondent-claimant since died, Respondents 2 to 5 have been impleaded as the legal heirs. Under the impugned judgment, dated 18-6-1998 in O.P. No. 14 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hindupur, at the culmination of the enquiry, allowed claim of the claimant for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-and directed that the amount shall be paid with interest at 15% per annum from the date of petition till realization by the first respondent-insurer, the present appellant. Having been aggrieved by the said judgment, the insurer has now filed the present appeal assailing the same.2. The main thrust of the contention of...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Laxmanna and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Reported in: 2(2005)ACC228
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The Insurer is the appellant. First respondent-claimant filed a claim petition claiming compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor accident that occurred on account of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the tractor owned by sixth respondent herein. During the pendency of claim petition, the first respondent-claimant since died, respondents 2 to 5 have been impleaded as the legal heirs. Under the impugned judgment, dated 18.6.1998 in O.P. No. 14 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hindupur, at the culmination of the inquiry, allowed claim of the claimant for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- and directed that the amount shall be paid with interest at 15% per annum from the date of petition till realisation by the first respondent insurer, the present appellant. Having been aggrieved by the said judgment, the insurer has now filed the present appeal assailing the same.2. The main thrust of the contention o...
Sri Prashanth Spinners Ltd. Vs. Chunnilal Pranjivandass and Co.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Reported in: 2004(4)ALT609; 2005(3)ARBLR485(AP)
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri D.V. Sitaram Murthy, Counsel representing the Revision Petitioner and Sri I.R. Joshi, Counsel representing Sri Vijay Sen Reddy, Counsel representing the respondent.2. This Revision is preferred as against an order made in E.A. No. 65/2002 in O.E.P. No. 26/2001 in A.T. No. 10/2000-01 made by the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur on 2-7-2003. The said E.A. No. 65/2002 was filed on the ground that the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, has no jurisdiction to entertain the E.P. at all. As I can see from the impugned order, several other aspects also had been discussed and when once the question of jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the E.P. is decided, I am of the considered view that the other questions which had been discussed in the impugned order would fall into total insignificance.3. Sri D.V. Sitaram Murthy, the learned Counsel representing the Revision Petitioner had drawn the attention of this Court to Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›