Andhra Pradesh Court October 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Seshaiah Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-14-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD307; 2004(2)ALT744
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, directing the transfer of investigation into allegations of corrupt practices of misappropriation of funds, fraudulent transactions and other irregularities, committed in the utilization of drought aid funds in Anantapur District, from the Anti Corruption Bureau and Enforcement Department of Government of Andhra Pradesh, Respondents 4 and 5 respectively, to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Respondent No. 7.2. The petitioner is Professor of Law in Krishna Devaraya University, Anantapur. He claims that he is the Joint Secretary of a Non-Political Human Rights Organization, devoted to the cause of the democratic and human rights of the people. The petitioner submits that Anantapur is one of the most backward, famine infested and drought affected districts in the country. According to him, funds to the tune of about Rs. 45-00 crores were released between the years 1993 and 1996, under various Schem...
K.L. Venkateswar Rao Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-14-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)963; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)503; III(2004)BC99
ORDERA. Gopala Reddy, J.1. All these Criminal Petitions are being dealt with under a common order since issue requires to be adjudicated in all the petitions is similar.2. The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of these criminal petitions, in nutshell, are as under:3. The second respondent in Crl. P. Nos. 821 and 822 of 1999 and petitioner in Crl. P. No. 4915/2001 and Crl. P(SR) No. 17155/2001 filed two complaints for the alleged offence under Sections 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act') with regard to bouncing of cheques in CC Nos. 851/96 and 901/96 respectively before IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Learned Magistrate by his order dated 21.8.1997 passed the following order, separately, in both CCs''Complainant absent. Accused present. No representation from the Complainant in spite of the matter coming for trial. Hence Complaint dismissed for default and accused acquitted.'Aggrieved by the said acquittal, the complainant filed Crl. N...
Datla Chandraiah (Died) by Lr Vs. Kothalanka Durgavara Prasada Rao and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-14-2003
Reported in: 2004(4)ALD396; 2004(5)ALT378
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The present Review Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed by the second petitioner, who was brought on record, as the legal representative of the deceased first petitioner.2. The relief prayed for in the present Review Petition under Order 47, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code in short) is to review the judgment and decree made in A.S. No. 174 of 1990 dated 3.7.2002.3. The facts in nutshell are as under:The legal representative of the first appellant, who was brought on record in the appeal and who should have been added as a party to the suit as a necessary party, and who, in fact had not been added as a party, raised an objection relating to the validity and binding nature of the judgment and decree so far as it relates to plaint 'A' schedule property in O.S. No. 52 of 1982 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Bhimavaram.4. The other factual aspects in detail may not be necessary in the light of the elaborate ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›