Andhra Pradesh Court October 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Majeti Gopala Krishna Vs. Commissioner, Rajahmundry Municipal Corporat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD284
B.S.A. Swamy, J.1. This very proceedings initiated by the appellant herein are misconceived. Admittedly, the tax is being levied on the house owner and the same has to be paid to the Municipality. Hence, if there is any dispute with regard to the collection of tax, it is between the landlord and the Municipality, but not the tenant. Hence, a suit, which is filed by the tenant questioning the enhancement of tax is a frivolous one.2. Hence, I am of the view that both the Courts below rightly dismissed the suit, which was filed by the tenant. The judgment and decree of the Courts below do not call for any interference from this Court. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs....
Vijaya Spinning Mills Limited Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporatio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD274; (2004)IILLJ46AP
ORDERB. Seshasayana Reddy, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order dated 10-1-2001 passed in E.I. Case No. 37 of 1999 on the file of Employees Insurance Court and Chairman Industrial Tribunal-I, Hyderabad whereby the learned Chairman dismissed the application of the appellant filed under Section 75(1)(g) of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.2. Facts of the case in brief giving rise to filing of this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the appellant-Vijaya Spinning Mills Ltd. are:The appellant is a spinning mill having its factory at Ganguru, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District. A canteen in the company premises is run by a Co-operative Society registered under A.P. Co-operative Societies Act. The said society is known as Vijaya Spinning Mills Employees Co-operative Canteen Limited. It has its own bye-laws and it is run on no profit and no loss basis. The Managing Committee of the canteen looks after the canteen and maintains the books and registers of the canteen...
Vijayawada Chamber of Commerce and Industry Vs. Registrar of Non-tradi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD353; 2004(2)ALT357; [2004]122CompCas796(AP); [2004]51SCL378(AP)
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. By this Company Petition, filed under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, the petitioner, namely M/s. Vijayawada Chamber of Commerce and Industry, seeks a direction to the respondent, namely Registrar of Non-Trading Companies, to restore the name of the petitioner to the Register of Non-Trading Companies.2. The petitioner was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') read with Section 3 of the Non-Trading Companies Act, 1962 (for short the 'Non-Trading Act') under Registration No. 19/64, with its registered office situate on Chamber Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada.3. The main objects for which the petitioner was incorporated was to promote and protect trade, commerce and industries located in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner is a non-trading company. The liability of its members is limited. The petitioner has on its register rolls about 1200 members drawn from various in...
S. Nagappa Vs. K.P. Hanumappa
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2003
Reported in: 2004(4)ALD294; 2004(2)ALT364; III(2004)BC553
ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J. 1. The petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, seeks to assail the orders in E.A. No. 507 of 2002 in E.P. No. 259 of 2002 in O.S. No. 931 of 1998, dated 12-11-2002 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur, dismissing the application filed under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking to raise the attachment of the petitioner's pension amount.2. Heard both sides.3. The respondent/decree holder having obtained a decree for recovery of money, filed the Execution Petition and sought for attachment of the Bank Account of the petitioner/Judgment debtor. The main submission made on behalf of the petitioner in the application filed seeking exemption under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code is that, the amount as lying in his Savings Bank account represents Pension and therefore, the same cannot be attached or proceeded against as per the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Union of India v. Jyothi Chit Fund and Finance and Ors., : (197...
C. Subramanyam Vs. C. Sumathi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)905; I(2004)DMC456
Bilal Nazki, J1. This is the reference made by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 12.2.2002 in respect of order dated 19.7.2001 passed by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pakala in Crl. M.P. No. 798 of 2001 in M.C. No. 5 of 2000.2. The brief facts that are necessary for answering the present Reference are that the first respondent herein filed a petition seeking to set aside the order dated 4.10.2000 whereunder the maintenance petition filed by her in M.C. No. 5 of 2000 was dismissed for default. She filed the said maintenance petition against her husband. When the case came up for hearing on 4.10.2000 for her non-appearance, the Court dismissed the maintenance petition for default. She filed a petition seeking restoration of the maintenance petition on the ground of ill-health. Her husband contended that no medical certificate in support of the claim of ill-health was filed and the default order could not be set aside. After hearing both sides, the learned Magistrate ...
Kalyani Roller Flour Mills (P) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Commercial ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD712; [2004]134STC545(AP)
Motilal B. Nail, J.1. These two Special Appeals are directed against the common order dated 7.1.1995 passed by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Proceedings No. I. III (3)/185/94-1 relating to the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93.2. The appellant-M/s.Kalyani Roller Flour Mills (P) Limited, Guntakal was finally assessed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Guntakal on gross and net turnover of Rs. 3,00,47,065/- and Rs. 1,66,06,980/-respectively for the assessment year 1992-93 and Rs. 2,54,57,027/- and Rs. 57,32,829/-respectively for the assessment year 1991-92. The Commercial Tax Officer levied tax on the first sale of wheat and wheat products and the sale of atta by the assessee.3. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred appeals before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Kurnool. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner partly allowed the appeals. Against the orders of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, Revision under Section 20(1) of the APGST Act (for short 'the Act') was fil...
Megacity Builders Vs. A.P. State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: AIR2004AP49; 2003(6)ALD834; 2004(1)ALT345
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner invokes the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and accordingly prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order dated 11-12-2002 in R.P. No. 188 of 2002 on the file of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad and quash the same.2. In order to consider as to whether the impugned order suffers from any error apparent on the face of the record so as to be corrected by this Court in exercise of its judicial review jurisdiction, relevant, facts may have to be noticed.3. The 2nd respondent herein filed a complaint C.D. No. 1520 of 1998 on the file of the District Consumer Forum-II, Hyderabad alleging certain deficiencies of service by the writ petitioner.4. The writ petitioner is a builder who undertook to develop and construct residential flats in the premises bearing Municipal Door No. 1-2-412/5, Valmeeki Nagar, Domalguda, Hyderabad. T...
Kotte Jagannadha Rao Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD554
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The petitioner-claimant, Kotte Jagannadha Rao filed the present civil revision petition aggrieved by the order made by the Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, in I.A.No. 200 of 2001 in L.A.O.P. No. 157 of 1995, dated 9-10-2001.2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bandar-Land Acquisition Officer, Bandar, Krishna District, is the respondent-Referring Officer.3. Sri O. Manohar Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioner-claimant had submitted that the impugned order, holding that the extent of land acquired by the Government in a land acquisition proceeding will not fall within the purview of reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, hereinafter referred in short as 'the Act', cannot be sustained. The learned Counsel had drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph-2 of the objections filed by the petitioner-claimant before the Revenue Divisional Officer-Land Acquisition Officer, Bandar, wherein specific objection was taken stating...
M. Gnana Prasunamba Vs. District Educational Officer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(3)ALT363
ORDERC.V. Ramulu, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the salaries due to the petitioner from 3-3-1997 to till date as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to pay the salaries due to him.2. According to the petitioner she was selected and appointed by the Staff Selection Committee on 25-2-1997 against unaided secondary grade teacher vacancy in the fourth respondent school. The said appointment was approved by the competent authority as required under law. She joined and reported for duty on 3rd March 1997 and since then the petitioner is being continuously engaged as teacher till date, but her salary is not being paid though her services are being utilized regularly. The petitioner asserts that under G.O.Ms.No. 1, Education, dated 1-1-1994 as per Rule 17 of the Rules she is entitled for being paid salaries as prescribed by the Governing Body of the Educational Institutions. According ...
Subash Chand Agarwal and anr. Vs. Sheshank Goel, Ias, District Collect ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALT1
C.V. Ramulu, J.1. The Contempt Case and the Writ Petition are interconnected and as such they are being disposed of together.Contempt Case No. 807 of 20002. This contempt case has been filed complaining wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 20-8-1998 passed in Writ Petition No. 23613 of 1998.3. According to the petitioners, though the said order had become final the respondents had demolished the structures on the premises bearing Door No. 2-7-645 to 649, 650/1 and 650/2 on the Rashtrapathi Road, Nizamabad for the purpose of widening of the road on 31-5-2000, in spite of the fact that the orders of this Court were brought to the notice of the respondents by way of a Telegram, which was received by them on 30-5-2000 itself.4. The premises in question was constructed in 1930s leaving sufficient set off for future widening of the road. The width of the Rashtrapathi Road was 60. The Director of Town Planning, Government of Andhra Pradesh had prepared a plan for organized dev...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »