Andhra Pradesh Court January 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nandam Eswaraiah and ors. Vs. Proddatur Padmasali Bahuthama Sangham an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD89; 2003(6)ALT444
ORDERE. Dharma Rao, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order, dated 3-10-2002, of the Court below, dismissing the application in I.A.No. 655 of 2000 in O.S.No. 283 of 2000, as not pressed, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed. 2. Petitioners herein are defendants and respondents herein are plaintiffs in O.S. Np.283 of 2000. The suit is filed for declaration of plaint schedule property as public property and for declaration of plaintiffs management over the plaint schedule property and for permanent injunction. 3. LA. No. 655 of 2000 was filed by the plaintiffs seeking temporary injunctionrestraining the defendants and their men from in any way entering into the schedule Kalyanamandapam either on the guise of election or on the guise of any bogus association and from interfering with their peaceful possession and management of plaint schedule property. 4. The case of the petitioners is that when the respondents with a view to protract the litigation wanted to lead oral evidence in the...
Novapan Industries Limited Vs. S. Krishna Murthy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD126; [2003(97)FLR342]
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the orders of the Labour Court-II, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as 'the Labour Court') dated 13-11-2002 in I.D.No.85 of 1999. The Management is the petitioner herein. The impugned order came to be passed under the following facts and circumstances: 2. The 1st respondent (hereinafter referred to as 'the workman') was appointed as a Trainee security Guard of the petitioner, which is an industrial company, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Management'), through orders dated 1-4-1982. His services were confirmed on 9-2-1985. The relationship between the workman and the Management were not cordial. Right from regularisation of services, there were disputes of one kind or the other. The workman was active in the trade union relatable to the Management. In the year 1995, the workman intended to contest for the post of Vice-President of the Novapan Mazdoor Sangh. The Management filed OS No. 228/95 and obtained an interim...
P. Janardhan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD170; 2003(2)ALT579
Bilal Nazki, J. 1. These two writ petitions raise same questions of fact and law therefore they are decided by this common judgment. Writ Petition No. 21111 of 2001 has been filed by Sri P. Janardhan Reddy, a former leader of the Congress Legislature Party challenging G.O. Ms. No. 544, Rev. (LA) Deptt. dated 4-8-2001. The same G.O has been challenged in the other writ petition being W.P. No. 22993 of 2001. This writ petition has been filed by one of the claimants whose land had been acquired. He also claimed the same relief which has been claimed in the first writ petition. The facts mentioned in Writ Petition No. 21111 of 2001 are taken for the disposal of these writ petitions.2. There were reports that certain irregularities had been committed by various authorities in payment of compensation in land acquisition matters pertaining to Visakhapatnam District. This incident came to be known as 'Yeleru scam'. A writ petition being W.P. No. 1235/97 had been filed by one V. Madhusudhan Red...
K.M. Safiullah Vs. A.P. State Wakf Board and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD440; 2003(2)ALT253
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. The petitioner, who is the Mutawalli of the Wakf Institution, by name Jamia Mosque, has filed this writ petition impugning the Notice No. B3/1/ ATP/2003, dated 18-1-2003, issued by the 1st respondent, calling upon him to show cause as to why action should not be taken under Section 64(5) of the Wakf Act, 1995.2. The petitioner is a permanent Mutawalli of Jamia Mosque. He was appointed on 30-5-1984. He claims to have been discharging his duties sincerely and in the best interest of the institution. While so, on the basis of certain allegations made against him by the 2nd respondent-District Collector, the 1st respondent-Wakf Board, in its meeting held on 18-1-2003, unanimously resolved to place the petitioner under suspension for a period of ten days, it was also resolved to issue show cause as contemplated under Section 64(5) of the Wakf Act, 1995 (for short 'the Wakf Act'). In pursuance of the said resolution, the 1st respondent issued two different notices date...
Kasha Kistappa Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: II(2003)ACC729; 2004ACJ1937; 2004ACJ1937; 2003(2)ALD644; 2003(2)ALD644; [2003(97)FLR591]; (2003)IILLJ447AP; (2003)IILLJ447SC
Ms. G. Rohini, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in CMA No. 1917 of 1991 dated 29.6.2000, which arises out of the Order of the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Ranga Reddy District Zone in WC No. 109 of 1989. 2. The appellant is the claimant in W.C. No. 109 of 1989, which was filed under Sections 3 and 4 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 seeking a compensation of Rs. 98,000/- on the ground that he suffered permanent disability during the course of the employment. By Order dated 3.4.1991 the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation granted compensation of Rs. 35,471/- together with interest at 6% per annum. Aggrieved by the said Order, C.M.A. No. 1917 of 1991 was filed by the New India Assurance Company Limited, the 1st respondent herein with whom the accident vehicle was insured and who was held to be liable for payment of the compensation awarded in W.C. No. 109 of 1989, the learned Single Judge allowed the appeal holding that W....
Sunrise Oleo Chemicals Ltd. Vs. K.M. Enterprises
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)912; 2003(3)ALT106; I(2004)BC407; [2005]123CompCas242(AP); [2003]44SCL368(AP)
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The revision petitioners stand convicted by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad by his judgment dated 19-7-1999 in C.C. No. 902 of 1998 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000 by the 1st petitioner and to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and further to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000 by the 2nd petitioner with the necessary default sentences. On appeal, the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad by his judgment dated 26-6-2000 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 291 of 1999 while confirming the conviction, modified the sentences of fine by sentencing each to pay to Rs. 5,000 instead of Rs. 25,000.2. The 1st respondent herein laid a complaint against the revision petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging inter alia that the 2nd accused being the Managing Director of the 1st accused company having purchased electrical an...
Mandadi Ram Reddy and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)764; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)202; III(2003)BC438; [2004]120CompCas201(AP); 2003CriLJ3647
ORDERT. Ch. Suray Rao., J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 27.6.2002 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Miryalguda in Crl.M.P. No. 2650 of 2002 in C.C. No. 667 of 1998.2. The petitioners are the accused in C.C. No. 667 of 1998 filed by the 2nd respondent herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They filed Crl.M.P. No. 2650 of 2002 under Section 258 of Code of Criminal Procedure to stop further proceedings in the case and to discharge them. That application having been dismissed under the impugned order, they are now assailing the same.3. It is averred inter alia in the petition filed by them that the 2nd respondent and one Kandula Venkat Reddy sold the land covered by Sy. Nos. 704, 706, 800, 804, 797, 798, 710 and 711 situate at Damaracharla village measuring Ac.0-15 guntas at the rate of Rs. 3,75,000/-per acre and executed an agreement of sale dated 10.11.1997 and received on various occa...
G.J.R. Sunand Vs. Convention of Baptist Churches of Northern Circars ( ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT261
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The 3rd respondent in Writ Petition No. 18537 of 2002 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein directing the Commissioner and Director of School Education (4th respondent herein) to pass appropriate orders in the matter of recognition of the 2nd respondent herein as the Convener of the Education Committee of the C.B.C.N.C within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The learned Single Judge also held that the 2nd respondent deserves to be recognised as Convener. However, such recognition shall be without prejudice to the rights of the parties or others to approach any court of competent jurisdiction and seek appropriate declaration and consequential relief.2. Before adverting to the question as to whether the judgment under appeal suffers from any infirmities requiring any correction as such by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Clause 15 of ...
Geetanjali Wines Vs. P. Bhaskar Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALT666
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. Since the controversy involved in these writ petitions is interconnected, both the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.2. Writ Petition No. 18302 of 2002 is filed assailing the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in seizing the petitioner's IL-224 wine shop and stocks on 17-9-2002 vide FIR No. 353 of 2002-03, as bad in law, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the judgment of this Court reported in : 2002(1)ALT108 (D.B.) and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restrain themselves from illegally visiting/harassing the petitioner without following the due process of law and also for a further direction to the respondents 3 and 4 to initiate disciplinary proceedings against respondents 1 and 2 in the interest of justice.3. The complaint of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the Inspector, and the Sub-Inspector of Nalgonda Excise Station, respondents 1 and 2 herein came to his shop with two persons on...
T.K. Satyanarayana Chary Vs. Chairman, A.P. State Electricity Board an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT334
ORDERC.V. Ramulu, J.1. This writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer w.e.f. 14-9-1977 and consequently to direct the respondents to restore and fix the petitioner's seniority in the cadre of Assistant Divisional Engineer at serial No. 127 instead of 450 in the integrated seniority list communicated by the A.P.S.E.B., through B.P.Ms. No. 115, dated 13-10-1989.2. The case of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Junior Engineer in A.P.S.E.B., w.e.f., 1-10-1965 on temporary basis. Later on, he was selected for regular appointment as Deputy Engineer along with 349 candidates w.e.f., 22-6-1986 and his services were regularized on completion of probation period w.e.f., 23-2-1968. The seniority list prepared by the Chief Engineer, Electricity (Project), Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad, in his Memo No. ROC/1625-P2/66, dated 4-5-1970 was communicated and...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »