Andhra Pradesh Court January 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kudiyala Ramana Vs. Vattikolla Somaraju and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD93; 2003(6)ALT730
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. The revision petitioner filed the civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure questioning the order of the Junior Civil Judge, Prathipadu in E.A.S.R.No. 3014 of 2001 in E.P.No. 45 of 1998 in O.S. No. 44 of 1995 dated 20.11.2001. 2. The facts in brief are as follows: 3. The revision petitioner is the auction purchaser. The petitioner participated in the above E.P. sale proceedings and became the highest bidder and the sale was knocked down for Rs. 67,000/- in his favour on 31-7-2001. The petitioner paid an amount of Rs. 16,750/ on 31-7-2001 i.e., 1/4th amount of Rs. 67,000/-. It is further stated that the petitioner applied for challan for the deposit of me remaining sale consideration and for the general stamps (i.e.,) N.J Stamps and it was also stated thata specific mention was made in this regard in the application. But, however, the challan was not issued for general stamps. The petitioner also stated that he applied for challan...
Titan Watches Limited Vs. Senior Inspector Legal Metrology, Weights an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD577; 2003(4)ALT29
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of wrist watches. It has got its distributors all over the country and one of its distribution point is at Mahabubnagar. On 28-12-1982 the Senior Inspector of Legal Metrology, Weights and Measurements Department, Mahabubnagar, A.P., the first respondent herein, inspected the shop of the petitioner and on finding that various specifications as to the date of manufacture, the price etc., have not been printed on the container, he has seized certain watches and issued show-cause notice alleging contravention of Section 39 of the Standards of Weights and Measurements Act, 1976, hereinafter referred to as the Act and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 hereinafter referred to as the Rules. In the show-cause notice dated 2-1-1993, it is also indicated that the contravention alleged against the petitioner is compoundable under Section 73 of the Act. 2. On receipt of the notice the petitioner h...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›