Andhra Pradesh Court January 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vemula Satyavathi Vs. District Collector, Krishna and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALD415; 2008(2)ALT738
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by endorsement dated 22.10.1999 issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Machilipatnam. It is the case of the petitioner that her husband was assigned an extent of Acs. 1.19 in R.S. No. 81/2 of Potepally Village on payment of consideration. After his death the petitioner is cultivating the land. When the petitioner approached the authorities for mutation of the revenue record it was refused and therefore she filed a suit being O.S. No. 203 of 1991 on the file of the Court of Principal District Munsif, Machilipatnam which was decreed on 10.8.1994 directing the District Collector to alter 10(1) account and mutate the name of the petitioner and enter in revenue records. The Government's appeal being A.S. No. 101 of 1994 was also dismissed on 22.8.1997. Therefore, mutation was carried out. After the land was mutated in the name of petitioner, she decided to alienate the property to third parties and presented a sale deed before the third resp...
Lakshmi S.T. Mining and Leasing Labour Contract Co-operative Society L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2003
Reported in: AIR2003AP226
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. At the request made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition itself is heard and is being disposed of finally.2. This Writ petition is filed to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in directing the 3rd respondent to submit approved mining plan by proposing to grant mining lease for Barytes over an extent of Ac. 110-00 in Sy. Nos. 56. 58 of Pocharam village, Garla Mandal, Khammam District in favour of the 3rd respondent vide Memo No. 14956/M.III-2/2000 dated 18-12-2001 which was addressed to the 3rd respondent alone even before the consideration of the application of the petitioner society for grant of mining lease in respect of the very same area as Illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and contrary to the procedure specified in Rule 26 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960.3. The petitioner is a society formed for the welfare of the members of the society by under...
Dammagouni Dubba Rajagoud and anr. Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Publi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)292; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)299
K.C. Bhanu, J.1. Crl.A. No.760 of 1996 is filed by A-1 and A-2 whereas Crl.A. No.776 of 1996 is filed by A3 to A-6 against the judgment in S.C. No.387 of 1993 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Siddipet, Medak District whereunder A-1 to A.6 were convicted for the offence under Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years each and further A-1 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5000-00 in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 11/2 years whereas A-2 to A-6 are further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000-00 each in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 21/2 years each. Further, A-1 is convicted for the offence under Section 25(1) of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000-00 in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 11/2 years and the substantive sentences of imprisonment imposed against A-1 are directed to run concurrently. Assailing the sai...
V. Sailaja Vs. V. Koteswara Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD673
Gopalakrishna Tamada, J. 1. As the parties to all these petitions are one and the same and the contentions raised by them are common, all these Transfer C.M.Ps. are disposed of by common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as they are arrayed in Transfer C.M.P. No. 463 of 2000, which is filed by wife.2. Transfer C.M.P. No. 463 of 2000 is filed by the petitioner (wife) seeking transfer of O.P. No. 416 of 2000 from the file of the Family Court, Vijayawada, to the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Vizianagaram.3. While so, Transfer C.M.P. No. 1 of 2002 is filed by the respondent (husband) seeking transfer of O.P. No. 15 of 2001 from the file of the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Vizianagaram, to the Family Court, Vijayawada. Similarly, Transfer C.M.P. No. 4352 of 2002 is filed by the husband seeking transfer of M.C. No. 62 of 2000 from the file of Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate's Court, Vizianagaram, to the Family Court, Vijayawada.4. The facts which l...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and United India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. B ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD319
Dubagaunta Subrahmanyam, J.1. As in both the appeals common questions of law are to be answered, I propose to dispose of both the appeals by a common judgment even though the two appeals were heard on different dates. 2. C.M.A.No.152 of 2000 is filed against the award dated 24.3.1999 in O.P.No.420 of 1997 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Adilabad. The Insurance Company filed this appeal. On 6.6.1997 the first respondent in the claim petition was driving a Scooter owned by the second respondent and at that time the Scooter dashed against the deceased Ramji Nayak, who sustained injuries and later died as a result of the injuries sustained by him in the course of the accident. The claimants are the dependants on the deceased. They claimed a total compensation of Rs.2,50,000=00. The vehicle was insured by the second respondent - owner with the Insurance Company, namely the present appellant. All the respondents contested the claim petition. The ...
Singirkonda Surekha Vs. G.V. Sharma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD803
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. First respondent obtained a decree against respondents 2 to 5 for recovery of money and filed E.P.No. 162 of 2000 to execute that decree and got attached the house property specified in the scheduled appended to the E.P., which was sold in Court auction on 22.04.2002 and that sale was confirmed on 24.06.2002. On 23.07.2002, i.e., about one month after the confirmation of sale, revision petitioner filed E.A.No. 212 of 2002 under Order 21 Rule 58 C.P.C. to raise the attachment over the property which was sold in Court auction and the same was dismissed as belated under Proviso (a) to Order 21 Rule 58(1) C.P.C. Hence this revision by the petitioner in E.A.No. 212 of 2002.2. The contention of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is that in view of Magunta Mining Co. v. M. Kondarami Reddy, : AIR1983AP335 , the order under revision cannot be sustained. He contended that the ExecutingCourt should have permitted the parties to adduce evidence and disposed ...
Kiran Graphics Vs. Tender Committee Constituted for Technical and Pric ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD808
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. The respondents have cancelled the tendering process notified on 29-08-2002 for supply of printed forms to meet to the day-to-day requirements of the Postal and Railway Mail Services and its' administrative offices. Three tenders were notified bearing Nos. J4/92/2002-03 for the procurement of Forms/Books from alphabet 'A to M' series; No. J4-93/2002-03 for procurement of Forms/Books from alphabet 'M to R' series; and No. J4-94/ 2002-03 for procurement of Forms/Books of 'SB and remaining series'. The petitioner submitted its bids in respect of the three tenders notified on 29-08-2002. Twenty nine tender forms were sold. The last date for receipt of the sealed tenders was on 30-09-2002. The tenders were to be received in two parts viz., (i) Technical Bid and (ii) Price Bid. The technical bid was to be opened on 30-09-2002. The technical bids of the seventeen (17) tenderers, which were received, were opened at 4-00 p.m. on 30-09-2002 and a tabular statement was ma...
Akula Parthasarathi and ors. Vs. Rajya Laxmi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD48
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar and Sri Satyanarayana the Counsel representing the respective parties.2. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the appellants/claim petitioners aggrieved by the order passed in E.A. No. 346 of 2000 in E.P.No. 214 of 1998 dated 17-9-2001 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam.3. The facts in brief are that the appellants/claim petitioners preferred E.A. No. 346 of 2000 in E.P.No. 2I4 of 1998 on the ground that they are the children of the Judgment Debtors 2 and 3 constituting a Joint Hindu Family and several allegations have been made that the said judgment Debtors are addicted to vices and hence the appellants/claim petitioners were not born by the date of the decree. It is also statedthat the claimants are entitled to the respective shares and the matter was opposed. Ultimately, the claim petition was dismissed. As against the same the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.4. Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, lea...
Ch. Kodandapani and ors. Vs. Kadidela Rajamouli
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: AIR2003AP237; 2003(2)ALD367; 2003(4)ALT84; 2003(3)ARBLR67(AP)
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Respondent filed the suit seeking eviction of the appellants from the demised premises, which is a building, arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation from the date of expiry of the period of lease. The Trial Court, after considering the evidence on record, not only ordered eviction of the appellants from the demised premises, but also passed a decree for Rs. 18,600/- towards arrears of rent and fixed the damages for use and occupation payable by the appellants to respondent at Rs. 7,500/- per month from 1.4.1998 onwards till the date of delivery of possession with interest at 12% p.a. On appeal by the appellants, the first appellate Court confirmed the decree of the Trial Court. Hence this second appeal.2. Respondent, who filed a caveat, appeared through a Senior Counsel.3. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent.4. The contention of the learned Counsel for the appellants is that since the dispute be...
Thilari Narayana Rao Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)392; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)482; II(2003)DMC1
Dalva Subrahmanyam, J.1. The revision petitioner-lst accused tiled the revision against the judgment of conviction and sentence in C.C. No. 61 of 1994 of the file of the III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Maehilipatnam in conviction the revision petitioner lst accused for an offence Under Section 498-A, I.P.C. and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two months as confirmed in Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 1997 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Machilipatnam.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :One Thilari Naga Maileswari'married the revision petitioner Thilari Narayana Rao on 22.3.1089 in Venkateswaa Swamy Temple at Guduru. At the time of marriage, the parents of the defacto complainant gave Rs. 35,000/- to Al to A3 towards dowry arid Rs. 10,000/- towards expenses. Seven months after their marriage, the only brother of the de facto complainan...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »