Andhra Pradesh Court September 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D. Krishna Kumar and anr. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALT806; 2003CriLJ143
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. On information that the management of Elite Club, situated at Road No. 9-A Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad is collecting huge amounts from players of Rummy with 13 cards/Sydicate in its premises and is using the premises as a common gaming house, on search proceedings issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Banjara Hills Division, Hyderabad, Jubilee Hills Police raided the Elite Club premises being managed by the petitioners, and found 40 persons playing Rummy (13 card game/ Syndicate) on 7 tables, by each player contributing Rs. 500/- to the Syndicate pool/ and each table giving Rs. 500/- to the club. In the 2nd floor they found 46 persons at 6 tables playing game of Rummy with 13 cards/Syndicate. In the 3rd floor they found 6 persons playing Rummy on the table and in the 4th floor they found 42 persons playing, at 8 tables, the game of Rummy with 13 cards/Syndicate, by each player contributing Rs. 1,000/-. Rs. 1,000/- was paid to the club by each table. In...
Sri Krishna Salt Works Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD91; 2003(4)ALT2
B.S.A. Swamy, J.1. The appellant in LPA No.258 of 1990 filed this application seeking to review the judgment passed by this Court, dated 23.11.1995.2. It is stated in the affidavit that basing on the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Chenchu Lakshmanna v. Submhmanya Reddy, : [1980]1SCR1006 , the learned single Judge of this Court dismissed the appeal in AS No.323 of 1980, Instead of the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in State of Tamil Nadu v. Ramalinga Samigal Madam, : AIR1986SC794 , wherein a contrary view was taken by the Supreme Court. Since it is an error apparent on the face of the record, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks to review the order passed by this Court.3. The facts of this case are that the review petitioner filed an application before the Settlement Officer seeking to issue ryotwari patta to him under Section 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (for short the Act) and the same was dismissed by t...
Bandi Narendra Kumar Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD(Cri)476; 2002(5)ALT129; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)325; 2003CriLJ288
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J. 1. This is an application for bail by A-5 in Crime No. 131/2002 of Yellandu police station registered Under Section 21(1)(a)(b) of Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (for short the 'Act').2. The case of the prosecution, as against the petitioner, is that he provided medical assistance to Kontham Mallaiah alias Sudheer, a committee member of East Sub-Zonal command of P.W.G., L.G.S. Group and thus committed an offence Under Section 21(1)(a)(b) of the Act.3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even assuming that the alleged act of the petitioner providing medical assistance is true it cannot be termed as an offence, much less an offence under the Act, by relying on the observations of Supreme Court in Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, AIR 1989 SC 2039 at page 2043, para 8, reading :'Every doctor whether at a Government Hospital or otherwise has the professional obligation to extend his services with due expertise to protecting life. N...
P. Surareddy and anr. Vs. District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT348
ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioners challenge the notification dated 26-03-1994 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') acquiring an extent of Ac. 0.75 cts. in R.S. No. 268/4; Ac. 0.43 cts. in R.S.No. 266/3; Ac. 0.52 cts. in R.S.No. 266/4 and Ac.1.12 cts. in R.S.No. 266/5 total Ac. 3.76 cts. situated in Kokkerapadu Village, Pedapadu Mandal, West Godavari District and interfering with the possession of the petitioners without conducting Section 5-A enquiry in accordance with the provisions of the Act as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and to drop all further proceedings including taking possession pursuant to the above notification.2. It is stated that the petitioners are owners of the said land which was acquired for the purpose of providing house-sites to the weaker sections of the society by issuing notification under Section 4(1) of the Act dated 26-03-1994 invoking urgency cl...
K. Vijayakumar Vs. Special Deputy Collector (La) Mch and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD225
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner is the owner of the premises bearing No. 3-4-686/3, situated at Narayanguda, Hyderabad. He purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 28-6-1991 from one Abdul Kareem. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad proposed to widen the road from Narayanguda crossroads to Bagh Lingampally cross roads. The property of the petitioner to an extent of 10.76 sq.yards was affected by the road widening.2. The respondents issued Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, proposing to acquire the affected area. However, the door number of the property was described as 3-4-686/1 instead of 3-4-686/3.The petitioner and his neighbour filed W.P.No.12247/99 challenging the land acquisition proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of with certain directions. Thereafter the possession of the petitioner was taken.3. On 10-6-1999, the petitioner got issued a notice to the respondents pointing out the discrepancies as to the municipal n...
Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Puppala Guruva ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-03-2002
Reported in: 2005ACJ133; 2002(5)ALD674; 2003(2)ALT204
V.V.S. Rao, J.1. The third respondent in OP No.680 of 1993 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Second Additional District Judge, Karimnagar is the appellant in' the CMA. On 21.5.1993, one Puppala Srinivas aged about 22 years was travelling in the lorry bearing No.AAH-2727. Incidentally he was working as Cleaner-cum-Driver of thelorry and allegedly drawing salary of Rs.1,500/-. The lorry met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving of the Driver, the fourth respondent herein (first respondent in the O.P.) resulting in death of three persons including Puppala Srinivas. His parents and his wife filed the O.P. claiming an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- as compensation for loss of dependency. The claim was opposed by the Insurance Company, the appellant herein on the ground that there was no negligence on the part of the Driver -Ramesh and on the ground that the Driver was not having valid licence when he was driving the vehicle and therefore the Insurance Com...
Hyderabad Cricket Association Gymkhana Grounds Vs. Cambridge Cricket C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD818; 2002(6)ALT268
ORDERJ. Chelameswar, J.1. All these civil revision petitions arise out of 3 OP Nos.352, 438 and 503 of 2002 on the file of the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Separate Interlocutory Application Nos. 842, 925, 926, 927 and 1026 of 2002 are filed in the above mentioned OPs., respectively. All the Interlocutory Applications were disposed of by separate orders in IA No. 844 of 2002. Common order in IA Nos.925, 926 and 927 of 2002 and another order in IA No. 1026 of 2002 on the 1st day of May, 2002.2. Aggrieved by the above mentioned orders, various parties to the l.As., preferred these civil revision petitions; the details of which would be adverted to at an appropriate stage in this order.3. The litigation revolves round the affairs of a registered society known as the 'Hyderabad Cricket Association' (hereinafter referred to as 'HCA') - a body registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act 1350 Fasli (since repealed by Andhra Prade...
Kothapalli Koteswara Rao Vs. Murukonda Subba Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD609; 2004(1)ALT168
Dubagunta Subrahmanyam, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of the judgment and decree dated 25.8.1990 in A.S. No. 88 of 1986 on the file of III Additional District Judge, Guntur, modifying the judgment and decree dated 6.6.1986 in O.S. No. 1179 of 1981 on the file of IV Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. 3rd respondent in the appeal before the lower appellate court is the appellant in S.A. No. 534 of 1990. Appellants 2 to 5 in the appeal before the lower appellate court are the appellants in S.A. No. 94 of 1993. 2. Necessary facts briefly for the disposal of these two appeals are as follows:The appellants in S.A. No. 94 of 1993 and another person by name M. Subba Rao filed a civil suit in O.S. No. 1179 of 1981 on the file of IV Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur, against the decree holder - first defendant and judgment debtor - second defendant requesting the trial court to set aside the order dated 20.3.1981 passed in E.A. No. 904 of 1979 in E.P. No. 677 of 1973 in O.S. No. 863 of...
J. Venkatramana Reddy Vs. Kanakagari Bhakthavatsalaiah and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD402; 2003(4)ALT16; I(2004)BC22
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. SA No. 172 of 1992 is preferred against the judgment and decree in AS No. 13 of 1990 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Srikalahasthi confirming the judgment and decree in OS No. 67 of 1986 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Srikalahasthi.2. SA No. 173 of 1992 is preferred against the judgment and decree in AS No. 12 of 1990 on the file of Sub-Judge, Srikalahasthi confirming the judgment and decree in OS No. 119 of 1985 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Srikalahasthi.3. The appellants in both the appeals are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in the respective suits. Both the suits were filed for recovery of money from the defendants due under promissory notes. Though the defendants in both the suits are common, the plaintiff in OS No. 67 of 1986 is different from the plaintiff in OS No. 119 of 1985.SA No. 172 of 1992 4. The factual matrix in OS No. 67 of 1986 is asunder:The plaintiff averred that on 9-6-1981 the defendants borr...
Rasool Bee and ors. Vs. Gousiya Begum
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-02-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD164; 2003(4)ALT99
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in AS No. 10 of 1990 on the file of the Sub-Court, Suryapet, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 3 of 1985 on the file of the District Munsif, Suryapet.2. The appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondent is the defendant in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit lands.3. The averments of the plaint are briefly as follows:One Mohd. Sharif was the original owner of the suit lands and some other properties. He died in the year 1966. He was the husband of the 1st plaintiff and father of plaintiffs 2 and 3. Mohd. Sharif had four sons viz., (1) Badruddin, (2) Azgar Ali and the plaintiffs 2 and 3. During the life time of Mohd. Sharif, Azgar Ali was given some property, including some portion of the suit iand, and the remainingproperty was being enjoyed by Mohd. Sharif along with ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »