Andhra Pradesh Court August 2002 Judgments
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Dr. Kumar Murukurthy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALT(Cri)380; I(2003)DMC489
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Criminal Petition No.2781 of 2002 is filed by the State to cancel the bail granted to the accused in Crime No.104 of 2002 of W.P.S., Central Crime Station, Hyderabad; Criminal Petition No.3171 of 2002 is filed by the complainant, on whose complaint the police registered the case in Crime No.104 of 2002, for cancellation of bail granted to the accused in the said crime, and the Criminal Petition No.3354 of 2002 is filed by the accused in the same crime to quash the F.I.R., in the aforesaid Crime No.104 of 2002.2. Since all the three petitions arise out of the same crime, they are being disposed of by a common order.3. On a complaint given Miss. Jyothi, who is the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.3171 of 2002, (hereinafter called the complainant), alleging that Kumar Murkurthi i.e., petitioner in Criminal Petition No.3354 of 2002 (hereinafter called the accused) after having met her about 1.1/2 years prior to the lodging of the complaint enticed her into havi...
Tag this Judgment!ZiauddIn Ahmed Vs. M.A. Raoof (Died) by Lr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD830; 2003(4)ALT43
T. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. Inasmuch as both theappeals arise out of the judgment and decreedated 21-11-1994 in OS No. 1123 of 1985 on the file of the I Additional Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderabad, they can be disposedof together.2. The unsuccessful second defendant is the appellant in CCCA No. 65 of 1995. The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in CCCA No. 93 of 1995. To avoid confusion, it is expedient to refer the parties as they are originally arrayed in the suit.3. The plaintiff laid the suit for partition and separate possession of the plaint A, B and C schedule properties. The case of the plaintiff in brief may be stated thus:4. The plaintiff and the second defendant are the son and daughter of the 1st defendant. They belong to Sunni sect. Late Akbari Begum was the mother of the plaintiff and the second defendant and the wife of the first defendant. She owned and possessed a house bearing No. 12-2-332/1 more fully described in schedule A, appended to the plaint and the movable pr...
Tag this Judgment!The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Its Depot Manager Vs. Mudidina Krishna Moort ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT624; [2003(96)FLR426]; (2003)ILLJ614AP
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. This appeal by the management of the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 17.8.2000 in Writ Petition No. 21615 of 1996.2. The above writ petition was filed by the first respondent-delinquent employee calling in question the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam dated 18.12.1995 in I.D. No. 148 of 1992.3. The background facts leading to filing of the writ petition are briefly noted as under: While the petitioner was serving as Conductor in a casual leave vacancy at Palasa Depot of the Road Transport Corporation in Srikakulam District, a charge memo containing three charges was issued to him alleging misconduct under the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (Conduct) Regulations. The first charge being that he failed to observe the mandatory rule of 'issue and start'; the second charge that he re-issued nine tickets of Re.1/- denomination to a batch of nine passengers and...
Tag this Judgment!P. Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD784; 2002(6)ALT612
ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J. 1. As the relief sought for and subject-matter involved in all the writ petitions is one and the same, it is felt expedient and convenient to dispose of all the writ petitions by the common order.2. The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions obtained IL 17 or IL 24 licence to set up liquor shops at various places like Vinukonda, Sattenapalli, Bobbili, Nuzived, Pithapuram, Satyavedu in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The grant of IL 24 and IL 17 licences in the State are governed by A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules').3. It is relevant to note here some of the provisions of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act')Section 15. Sale or buying of excisable article without licence prohibited :--(1) No person shall sell or buy any intoxicant except under the authority and in accordance with the terms and conditions of a licence granted in this behalf : Provided that a person having a licence to draw toddy from...
Tag this Judgment!Amul Sardar Vs. Sanaka Bala
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD375; 2003(6)ALT801
G. Rohini, J. 1. The second appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5.2.2001 in A.S. No. 1 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Asifabad confirming the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 3 of 1995 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Sirpur. 2. The appellant is the defendant who lost in both the Courts below. The respondent herein, who is the plaintiff filed O.S. No. 3 of 1995 seeking a declaration that she is the owner of the suit schedule land and for recovery of possession of the same. She also sought a mandatory injunction by directing the defendant/appellant to fill up the pit of the well which is dug in the suit land and for removal of the structure of a house raised in the suit land. The said suit was decreed by the learned trial Judge as prayed for. The appeal, A.S. No. 1 of 1998 preferred by the defendant was dismissed confirming the judgment and decree granted by the trial Court. Hence the second appeal by the defendant. The parties sh...
Tag this Judgment!Apseb (Now Aptransco) Rep. by Its Chairman and ors. Vs. P. Venkata Sub ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT75
B.S.A. Swamy, J.1. The A.P. TRANSCO filed this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 07-12-1998 in A.S. No. 190 of 1996 on the file of Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, enhancing the compensation payable to the respondent from Rs. 28,800/- to Rs.46,800/- by contending that the enhancement of the compensation given by the Additional District Judge by applying multiplier 19.50 instead of 16 cannot be sustained in law.2. The facts are not in dispute. In the year 1986 the respondent's son aged about 17 years was electrocuted and thereafter the respondent filed O.S. No. 136 of 1986 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Madanapalle. The trial court having fixed the monthly income of the deceased boy at Rs. 300/- (i.e.) Rs. 10/- per day, deducted l/3rd for his personal expenses and the loss of dependency was determined at Rs. 200/-per month and thereafter he applied multiplier 16 in awarding the compensation of Rs. 28,800/-. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, both the appella...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Zarina and 95 ors. Vs. Special Officer and C.A., Land Ceiling and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT82
V. Eswaraiah, J.1. The unsuccessful 96 Writ Petitioners filed this Writ Appeal in dismissing W.P.No.19190/2001 by the learned Single Judge on 08/04/2002.The appellants filed Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Vijayawada in issuing the proceedings in Rc.No.A2/309/1996 dated 30/10/1996 by ordering the operation of No Objection Certificates issued in different files in the months of November and December 1995 under Section 26(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act') in respect of the several extents of the lands in Sy.No.20/P of Vidhyadhara Puram, Vijayawada, in abeyance and further directing the Sub Registrar, Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada and the District Registrar, Vijayawada not to entertain any sale deed for registration in respect of the said land, is arbitrary, illegal and to direct the Sub Registrar and the District Registrar of Vijayawada to entertain the...
Tag this Judgment!Government of A.P. and ors. Vs. Sree Pancha Murthy Co-operative House ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD433
S.R. Nayak, J.1. All these writ appeals arise out of the common order of a learned single Judge dated 27-3-2000 made in Writ Petition Nos. 11200, 21431, 23217 and 19297 of 1998. Hence they are heard together and are being disposed of- by this common judgment.2. In Writ Petition No. 11200 of 1998, out of which Writ Appeal No.502 of 2000 arises, the petitioner-Sree-Pancha Murthy Co-operative House Building Society Limited, Hyderabad, represented by its President, prayed for the following relief:'For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus declaring that the action, whatsoever declaring the said extent of Ac.5-00 of land held by the petitioner herein in Sy. No. 129/105 and now treated as part of T.S. No. 1/1/1, Block-H, Ward No. 10 of Shaikpet village, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad District, as having been handed-over to 5th respondent treating it as Government land, is absolutely illegal, without juris...
Tag this Judgment!P.V. Satyanarayana Murthy and ors. Vs. A.P. State Electricity Board an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD268
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The petitioners, who are three in number are Diploma Holders in Electrical Engineering (L.E.E.). They have registered their candidatures with the Employment Exchange, Warangal. It is stated that there are vacancies for the post of Sub-Overseer under the establishment of Operation Circle, Warangal, and that the 4th respondent-Superintending Engineer, Warangal is the appointing authority in respect of the posts of Sub-Overseers. The said post is a circle level post. Warangal Zone comprises of four circles namely Warangal, Karimnagar, Adilabad and Khammam. It is averred in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the fourth respondent has sent requisition to the Employment Exchange, Warangal for sponsoring the names of the candidates for selection to the post of Sub-Overseer in Warangal Circle. Accordingly, theEmployment Exchange sponsored about 130 names. A written test was conducted on 10.5.1993 by the respondent-Board in Warangal wherein more ...
Tag this Judgment!Gorle Ramu Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD233
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. Introduction :2. The petitioner was granted Form IL 24 licence under the provisions of A.P. Excise Act, 1968 (for short, the Act), and A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 (for short, the Rules) during the year 1998-1999 permitting him to run a retail Indian Liquor shop at Vepagunta Village, Pendurthi Mandal. It was renewed from time to time and now it is valid till 31.3.2003. The second respondent herein, Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Visakhapatnam, who is the licensing authority granted Form-IL24 licence on 5.7.2002 to the third respondent to sell all kinds of Indian Liquor/Foreign Liquor on the premises in S.No. 42/3' of Laxmipuram Panchayat, Pendurti Mandal. This licence is assailed by the petitioner mainly on the ground that the second respondent violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India and denied 'equality before law' to the petitioner.Facts :2. Facts in brief leading to filing of the case are as follows. The second respondent i...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »