Andhra Pradesh Court June 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mechineni Kishan Rao Vs. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, Hyderabad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD816
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is the Convener of Telangana Samnvaya Committee (hereinafter called 'Samithi' for brevity). It was formed as a co-ordinating body of three constituent organisations viz., (i) Telangana Sadhana Samithi headed by Sri A. Narendra, who is a Hon'ble Member of Lok Sabha; (ii) Telangana Aikya Vedika headed by Dr. K.Jaya Shankar, former Vice-Chancellor of Kakatiya University and Sri Keshav Rao Jadhav, retired Reader in English; and (iii) Telangana Jana Sabha. The Samithi desired to hold a public meeting 'Telangana Polikeka' on 14-6-2002. Therefore, Sri A. Narendra, Hon'ble Member of Parliament, who is also the President of Telangana Sadhana Samithi, addressed a letter to the 1st respondent herein requesting permission to take out a procession from 1.00 p.m. from Indira Park to Nizam College and to hold a public meeting at Nizam College grounds. Even by 12-6-2002, when no order was passed by the 1st respondent, the Convenor of the Samithi has filed the prese...
The Telugu Academy Represented by Its Director and anr. Vs. Telugu Aca ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALT346
S.R. Nayak, J.1. This Writ Appeal is filed by the Telugu Academy represented by its Director as well as by the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary, Education Department, Hyderabad, and it is directed against the order of the learned Sing Judge dated 6-11-1993 made in W.P.No. 3111 of 1993.2. The respondent herein, viz., the Telugu Academy Academic Staff Union represented by its General Secretary filed Writ Petition No.3111 of 1993 praying for the following relief:'Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed here in, the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to (1) to implement the revised Scales of Telugu University to the Academic Staff of the Academy with effect from 1986; (2) to grant career advancement scheme which is being given to the academic staff in Telugu University.'3. The ab...
G. Chandra Shekar Reddy and anr. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD(Cri)33; 2002(4)ALT308; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)308; 2002(2)LS293
ORDERS.R.K. Prasad, J.1. Petitioners, who are accused in C.C.No.408 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hyderabad, East & North at Kothapet, Ranga Reddy District, invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.408 of 2000.2. First petitioner is the Managing Partner of the second petitioner's Firm, which is transacting in Ooty Acqua Cool Minerals meant for sale for public for human consumption. The Food Inspector of Warangal District took three bottles of 3 x 1 litres of Ooty Acqua Coll Minerals Pure 'N' Safe Mineral Water from the stock and sent them to public analyst. A notice dated 16.03.2000 was received by the petitioners on 20.03.2000 issued under Sec.13 (2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 informing the filing of complaint before the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hyderabad East and North, Kothapeta, Ranga Reddy District. A copy of the analyst report dated 2...
Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare) and ors. Vs. Datla Venkapath ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD386; 2002(4)ALT669
S.R. Nayak, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 12.2.1999 made in WP No. 13933 of 1998 and it is filed by the Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District, the Special Deputy Tahsildar (Tribal Welfare), Rajavommangi, East Godavari District and the Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajavommangi, East Godavari, the appellants 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The 1st respondent herein filed the above writ petition praying for the following relief:'..the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in entertaining. L.T.R.P. Nos. 110/ 96, 19/97 and 88/97 as illegal, without jurisdiction and barred by res judicata under Rule 8 of the Agency Rules and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 to drop all further proceedings in this regard.'The learned single Judge having opined that the LTRP Nos. 110/96, 19/97 and 88/97 filedbefore the Special...
Tamilnadu Card Boards and Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2002
Reported in: AIR2003AP438; I(2003)BC255
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful first defendant on O.S. No. 30/85 on the file of the Subordinate Judge Asifabad is the appellant and the first respondent in the appeal is the plaintiff and the second respondent in the appeal is the second defendant in the suit, who was set ex parte in the Trial Court. The first respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,39,834.80 ps. towards the cost of Sirrock Rolls supplied by the first respondent-plaintiff company to the appellant-first defendant and the second respondent-second defendant in the suit.2. The first respondent-plaintiff had pleaded in the plaint as follows:Plaintiff is a Public Limited Company, having its registered office in Hyderabad and factory at Sirpur Kaghaznagar. It is represented by the general power of attorney holder Mr. M.K. Bhaiya. The first defendant is also a Public Limited Company with registered office at Madras. It is represented by its Director Mr. V. Seshan. The second defendant is an Engineering Wo...
D. Dhanalaxmi Vs. Sannadhi Prabha Krishna @ Prabhavathi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD568; 2002(6)ALT265
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. This civil revision petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (for brevity, 'the Code') challenging the order dated 1 -4-2002 passed in IA No.332 of 2002 in OS No.6 of 1996 by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. The revision petitioner is the 6th defendant in the suit. Be it noted that she came on record as 6th defendant in the suit OS No.6 of 1996 filed by the plaintiff-1st respondent herein.2. The plaintiff-1st respondent filed the suit for cancellation of registeredsale deed executed by 1st detendant-2nd respondent herein in favour of 6th defendant-revision petitioner herein. In the said suit OS No.6 of 1996, the plaintiff also sought for perpetual injunction in addition to cancellation of the said registered sale deed.3. After the plaintiff closing her evidence, tke 1st defendant 2nd respondent herein inspite of affording opportunities to her to adduce evidence did not come forward to give evidence and ultimately it appea...
K. Narasimha Reddy Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD327
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a Post Graduate in Science with specialisation in Electronics from the Osmania University. The 3rd respondent issued an advertisement dated 3-12-1984 published in the local newspaper on 7-12-1984 inviting applications for the post of Lecturers in Physics and Electronics. The petitioner submitted his application since he fulfilled the qualifications stipulated therefor.2. The 3rd respondent, which is an Aided Private college, constituted a Selection Committee as required under G.O. Ms. No. 905 Education dated 21-9-1976. The petitioner was selected by the Selection Committee and accordingly the 3rd respondent issued orders dated 15-1-1985 appointing him as Lecturer in Electronics against the post of a regular vacancy. The petitioner joined the services of the 3rd respondent on 17-1-1985. The 4th respondent-University, to which the 3rd respondent college was affiliated, approved the appointment of the petitioner through proceedings dated 1-3...
K.V.V. Satyanarayana Vs. District Level Committee, Eluru, West Godavar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD493; 2002(4)ALT641
Dr. Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1 . By consent of all the parties, the writ appeal and the writ petition are taken up for hearing. Heard all parties.2. Neither the District Level Committee nor the District Panchayat Officer has filed any counter-affidavit to the writ petition, which was filed by the appellant herein to call for the records pertaining to the telegram dated 13-12-2001 issued by the second respondent, District Panchayat Officer, Eluru and quash the same is arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction. The telegram issued by the second respondent reads as follows:'To stop sand quarrying with proclainer engage labour with immediate effect --District Panchayat Officer Eluru.'3. According to the appellant/writ petitioner, he is a sand contractor and pursuant to the notification issued by the District Level Committee, Eluru in auction notice dated 18-9-2001, he participated in the auction held on 5-10-2001 and became highest bidder f...
T. Nagamma Vs. S. Subbarathnamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD687; 2003(1)ALT416
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful plaintiffs in OS No. 147 of 1994 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Chittoor. The parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The plaintiff had a son by name Kishore Kumar. Her other son is the 2nd defendant by name Nedamuni. The 1st defendant is the wife of Kishore Kumar. Kishore Kumar was employed as a Sub-Inspector of Police. While he was working at Kodur Police Station, Mehboobnagar District, he died on 14-11-1993 in a mine blast set up by the Naxalites. According to the plaintiff, the 1st defendant was paid Rs. 10,000/- towards ex-gratia and she left for her parents place together with her belongings.3. The plaintiff pleaded that ever since the death of her son Kishore Kumar, the 1st defendant developed hostile attitude towards the plaintiff and her family and was trying to knock away the entire benefits that the Government has extended on account of the death of Kishore Kumar under the variou...
B. Sujatha Devi and ors. Vs. Apseb, Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD703
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. In this writ petition the petitioners challenge the action of the respondents in charging an amount of Rs. 86,440/- towards interest on payment of Voluntary Loan Contribution by the petitioners. 2. The petitioners, 12 in number, claim to be owners of residential flats. It is their case that initially the entire complex was being served through a common-electricity supply connection and thereafter they applied for providing separate connections for each flat. The respondents demanded an amount of Rs. 1,58,000/-towards Voluntary Loan Contribution in six monthly instalments. The amount so demanded was paid between 1985-1988. Though the respondents agreed to provide electricity connection on payment of 1st instalment of Voluntary Loan Contribution i.e. Rs. 27,000/- the connections were provided only on 23-8-1991, that too, in pursuance of a direction given by this Court. They alleged certain facts with regard to the adjustment of the amount on account of revi...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »