Andhra Pradesh Court June 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Sharada Bai and anr. Vs. Chairman, the Special Court Under A.P. Lan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD105; 2003(1)ALT467
Dalva Subrahmanyam, J.1. The writ petitioners in WP No. 29675 of 1997, who are respondents 1 and 2 in LGC No. 162 of 1994, filed the writ challenging the common judgment passed in LGC No. 162 of 1994 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (for short' the Special Court') and to set aside the same as illegal and arbitrary.2. The writ petitioners in WP No.29712 of 1997, who are respondents 1 and 2 in LGC No. 133 of 1995, filed the writ challenging the common judgment passed in LGC No. 133 of 1995 on the file of the Special Court and to set aside the said judgment as illegal and arbitrary.3. The writ petitioners in WP No.2305 of 1998, who are respondents 3 to 7 in LGC No. 162 of 1994, filed the writ challenging the common judgment in LGC No. 162 of 1994 on the file of the Special Court and to set aside the same as illegal and arbitrary.4. Since the above three writ petitions arise under a common judgment delivered by the Special Court in LGC 162 o...
Emani Krishna Rao Vs. Vijaya Chitra Films and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD176
P.S. Narayana, J.1. This Appeal is filed by the appellant/1st plaintiff in OS No. 310/ 82 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam. The appellant/1st plaintiff along with other two plaintiffs Venkata Jagannadha Rao and Ramachandra Rao filed the suit for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12-8-1979 directing the defendants 1 to 15 in the suit to execute a sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs for Rs. 2,50,000/- in respect of plaint B Schedule property and for delivery of possession of the same or directing defendants 2 to 5 in the suit to execute sale deed in respect of 1065 sq.metres covered by the building portion which was permitted to be retained by them by 6th defendant in the suit under the provisions of Urban Land Ceiling Act on payment of proportionate consideration or in the alternative directing defendants 1 to 15 to pay a sum of Rs. 2,40,000/- as damages and also directing defendants 1 to 5 in the suit to refund a sum of Rs. 10,0...
M. Gangi Reddy Vs. A.P. Transco Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT150
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer in 1964 in the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board. He was promoted as Asst. Divisional Engineer in 1984 and thereafter as Divisional Engineer in 1991. He became eligible to be promoted to the next higher post i.e. Superintending Engineer in the year 1999. At present he is working as in-charge Superintending Engineer.2. The promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer is by way of selection. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) met in September 1999 to prepare the panel for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer.3. The case of the petitioner was also considered. The DPC approved the list on 30th September, 1999 which included the name of the petitioner and he was placed at No.4 in the selected list. Having regard to the existing vacancies, the petitioner was entitled to be issued the orders of promotion. However he was denied the promotion by the Competent Authority on the ground that t...
Kudithi Lakshma Reddy Vs. Gantla Satti Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD653
ORDERE. Dharma Rao, J.1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 5-4-2002 passed in IA No. 82 of 2002 in IA No. 12 of 1999 in OS No. 1 of 1999 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubabad - Warangal District, dismissing the petition filed for seeking police aid in implementing the ad interim injunction order granted by the Court in IA No. 12 of 1999 on 27-1-1999.2. IA No. 82 of 2002 was filed consequent upon the happening of an incident on 24-2-2002 when the respondents are alleged to have entered into the theatre, knocked out all the staff from the theatre, threatened the Manager with dire consequences, stopped him from exhibiting the film and closed the theatre; that the respondents occupied the Manager's room and did not allow the petitioner to run the theatre besides causing damage to the property. The petitioner is said to have approached the police officials and explained them with regard to the interim order in his favour, who are said to have refused ...
B. Janakiramaiah Chetty Vs. A.K. Parthasarathi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD(Cri)215; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)231; 2002CriLJ4062
B. Prakash Rao, J.1. The petitioner herein is the defacto-complainant, who is aggrieved against the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.8 of 2002 in S.C.No.334 of 1999 dated 23-1-2002 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge at Putturu dismissing the application purported to have been filed under Section 301(2) Crl.P.C seeking permission to conduct the prosecution in the main sessions case by his advocate under the directions of the Public Prosecutor.2. Briefly, the facts are that on the complaint filed by the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 325, 331 and 120-B IPC., the committal court took the case as P.R.C.No.17 of 1989 and committed the same to the Sessions Court as S.C.No.334 of 1999. According to the petitioner, there are several other cases, including a civil suit in O.S.No.117 of 1992 between the parties, wherein Sri S.R.Thyagarjan and Sri S.Satyanarayana, his advocates, are attending and therefore, those advocates are more acquainted with the facts and, therefo...
M. Naveen Vs. Kakatiya University, Warangal and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALD82; 2002(4)ALT407
S.R. Nayak, J.1. The unsuccessful writ petitioner has filed this writ appeal assailing the correctness of the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 30-11-1998 in Writ Petition No. 21659/2998.2. In the above writ petition, the petitioner sought mandamus declaring the proceedings No.806/B3/KU/1998, dated 27-7-1998 of the Registrar of the Kakatiya University, Warangal as illegal and seeking a direction to the Kakatiya University to permit him to write the first year B. Tech. examination for the academic year 1997-98. The writ petition was heard on merits and the same has been dismissed by the order under appeal.3. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition be noted briefly and they are as follows: The petitioner after completing his studies in Intermediate course wrote Common Entrance Test for Engineering, Agricultural and Medical Sciences for the academic year 1997-98 and he obtained rank 9444 in the said test. Vazeer Sultan College of Engineering, the 2nd respondent herei...
D. Venkateswarlu Vs. the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALT412
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. This writ petition filed by a delinquent Officer is directed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, (for short 'the Tribunal'), Hyderabad Bench dated 19.11.2001 in O.A. No.1183/2000. In the said Original Application, the appellant herein sought quashing of the charge sheet dated 15.5.2000 issued to him on the ground of delay in initiating the disciplinary proceedings. The Tribunal not being satisfied with that ground urged by the petitioner dismissed the Original Application. Subsequently, the petitioner also filed a Review Application No.11/2000 seeking review of the order made in O.A. No.1183/2000. That review application was also dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by its order dated 11.3.2002. Hence, this writ petition assailing both the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.2. The articles of charges and statement of imputation served on the petitioner-delinquent along with the charge sheet under Rule 9 of the Railway S...
Pallapothu Naga Prasad and 2 ors. Vs. Pallapothu Venkata Krishna Rao a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD251; 2003(6)ALT631
Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Plaintiffs in O.S.No.68 of 1980 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Bapatla are the appellants.2. For the sake of convenience I would refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the trial Court in this Judgment.3. Plaintiffs (appellants) filed the suit, inter alia, for partition and separate possession of their 20/121st share in the properties specified in the schedules appended to the plaint, alleging that they are sons of the 3rd defendant Govardhan Rao, the third son of Balakoteswar Rao, who including their father 3rd defendant had four sons and two daughters i.e., defendants 1 to 6, and that their grand father Balakoteswar Rao owned ancestral immovable properties viz., houses at Ponnur and Bapatla shown as item Nos.1 and 2 of plaint A schedule besides property shown in the plaint B schedule and business and other movable properties and that defendants 1 to 4, after their marriages, started living separately keeping the plaint schedule properties j...
Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by General Manager, South Central Railway a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT474
ORDERV. Eshwaraiah, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the Union of India represented by the General Manager, South Central Railway and two others against the order dated 29-9-2001 made in E.P.No. 41/2001 in O.P.No.20/1997 and O.S.No.370/1996 on the file of the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.2. The respondent is the contractor. Both the petitioner and the respondents have entered into an agreement for execution of certain works. As certain disputes arose between the respondent - contractor and the Railways, the contractor/respondent invoked the arbitration clause and the competent authority appointed the joint arbitrators and the arbitrators passed an award on 05-10-1996. The petitioners -railway authorities herein filed O.P. No.20/1997 challenging the award on various grounds to set aside the award and the contractor filed O.S. No. 370/1996 to make the award as the rule of court. The court below; by a common judgment and decree in ...
Durgaiah and ors. Vs. Mohd. ShabhuddIn (Died) L.Rs. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: 2004(1)ALT59
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful defendants in O.S.No. 1 of 1989 on the file of the District Judge, Medak, Sanga Reddy District are the appellants herein. Originally the suit was instituted by Mohd. Shabuddin and since he died, the Legal Representatives were brought on record.2. The suit was filed for the relief of permanent injunction. The original plaintiff Mohd, Shabuddin instituted the suit praying for the relief of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from in any way interfering with this peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties.3. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff is the pattedar and owner of the lands described in the schedule and it was also pleaded that at a particular point of time, one Tekmal Ramanna was the protected tenant of the plaintiff, relating to the plaint schedule properties. It was further pleaded that after the death of T. Ramanna, the defendants claiming to be his heirs, co-sharers and joint tenants fai...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »