Andhra Pradesh Court June 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pulla Prakasarao and ors. Vs. Nimmana Nagabhushanam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD489
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Defendants in OS No. 81 of 1981 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kakinada are the appellants.2. Respondent filed the aforesaid OS No. 81 of 1981 against the appellants for declaration of his title to 1 acre 86 cents of land in S.No. 178/12 within the boundaries mentioned in the scheduled appended to the plaint, hereinafter called the suit land, and for recovery of possession thereof and profits from the appellants.3. The case, is brief, of the respondents is that the suit land originally belonged to three brothers viz., Chittoori Venkata Raju, Viswanatham and Swamy, who had 1/3rd share each therein. After the death of his two brothers Venkata Raju and Viswanatham, Swamy let out the suit land to Pulla Naraiah, father of the appellants on an yearly rent of 10 bags of paddy payable on Makara Sankranti day every year. After the death of Naraiah, who committed default in payment of rent, since none of his legal heirs exercised their option to continue...
M. Rambabu and ors. Vs. Director of Animal Husbandry and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALD140
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The writ petitioners had questioned G.O. Ms. No. 7, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, dated 21-1-1997 and also prayed for a direction to the respondents to regularise the petitioner in the vacant posts of Attenders as per seniority list of casual labourers dated 25-11-1993 and seniority list of casual labourers dated 31-12-1995 and pass such other suitable orders.2. Certain of the writ petitioners i.e., writ petitioners 2, 5, 4, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 etc., filed OA No. 50235 to 299 of 1990 and Batch on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad along with the several others wherein the relief prayed for is:'......to direct the respondents herein to regularise the services of the applicants herein, while paying the scale of Rs. 740/-basic with all attendant benefits on par with regular employees performing the same or similar duties in Piggery Development Project at Visakhaptnam, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh after calling for r...
P. Srilakshmi Vs. Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)ALT793
S.R. Nayak, J.1. This Writ Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 11-7-1997 in W.P. No. 16579 of 1994 insofar as the learned Judge has not granted any relief to the petitioner as against respondents 4, 5, 7 and 8.2. The background facts leading to the filing of the writ petition be briefly noted first and they are as follows; The appellant viz., Smt. P. Srilakshmi is the petitioner in the Writ Petition. The petitioner is a Graduate in Commerce and she has passed Stenography Examination and obtained Diploma in English from Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages. The petitioner was selected to the post of Stenographer by the Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences (for short 'NIMS') after going through the process of selection and she was appointed as Personal Secretary to the Director and she reported for duty on 6-114986. The Director of the NIMS issued proceedings dated 25-2-1988 regularising her services along with others. As per the said p...
Divisional Forest Officer, Kaghaznagar, Adilabad District and anr. Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD55; 2002(5)ALT286
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. The Divisional Forest Officer, Kaghaznagar, Adilabad District and the Commissioner, Municipal Council, Kaghaznagar, Adilabad District, have filed this writ appeal being aggrievedby the order of the learned single Judge, dated 20-4-2000 made in Writ Petition No.20959of 1999.2. The respondent-saw mill' filed the writ petition questioning the legality of the proceedings RC No.9154/98/S4, dated 9-7-1999 issued by the Divisional Forest Officer, Kaghaznagar, Adilabad District, the 1st respondent in the writ petition, rejecting the application of the petitioner to shift the saw mill from the existing place to a new location at Survey No.85/2 of Chintaguda village in Kaghaznagar Mandal, which, admittedly falls within 5 kilometer-radius of reserve forest boundary. The Divisional Forest Officer -rejected the application on the ground that if the petitioner was permitted to shift the location of the saw mill to Survey No.85/2 of Chintaguda village, it would be contrary to the pr...
K. Ankaiah and ors. Vs. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD223; 2002(6)ALT170
ORDERDubagunta Subrahmanyam, J.1. This revision petition is filed against the order dated 18.12.1999 in CMA No.36 of 1999 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Chittoor at Tirupati confirming the order dated 3-12-1999 in IA No.2111 of 1997 in OS No.1075 of 1997 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati.2. Necessary facts for the disposal of this revision petition are as follows:The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S. No.1075 of 1997. They were owning immovable property in Tirumala Hills. They were doing business in the shops situated in their own properly. Those shop rooms and adjacent immovable property were acquired for the purpose of Tirumala Tirupati Devastlianams (hereinafter called as 'TTD'). They were given compensation for acquisition of their properties. In addition to giving monetary compensation to the plaintiffs, the TTD agreed to construct some shop rooms in Second Sannadhi Street in Tirumala and allot some shop rooms to the plaintiffs. TTD d...
B.P. Nagi Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD322
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. The unsuccessful writ petitioners have filed this writ appeal being aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge, dated 23-2-2001 made in Writ Petition No.26358 of 2000.2. The appellants filed the above writ petition praying for the following relief:'Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not cancelling the 'B' From licence in respect of Sri Srinivasa Talkies standing in the name of M/s. Laxmanna Sons and in seeking to renew the licence further for the year 2001 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to renew the licence without either reconstitution of the firm or the consent of the petitioners for renewal.'The writ petition was opposed by the 4th re...
Punukollu Ramachandra Rao Vs. Government of A.P., Municipal Administra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT222
S.R. Nayak, J.1. The writ petitioners are the appellants. The filed the writ petition assailing the validity of the final notice issued by Gudivada Municipality, Gudivada dated 4-1-1997 informing the petitioners that their request to renew the lease on enhanced rent at 18% only has been rejected and calling upon the petitioners to send their consent letters for enhanced rent at the rate of 33 1/3% on the existing rent. The rejection of the request of the petitioners was assailed mainly on the ground of discrimination. The plea of discrimination is founded on the fact that on a previous occasion, the Special Officer of the Municipality had renewed the lease in respect of shop No. 1 at the enhanced rent at 15% and, therefore, the petitioners should have been granted renewal of lease at the same rate. This contention of the petitioners was not found favour with the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge held-'The complaint of discrimination made by the petitioners, in my considere...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›