Andhra Pradesh Court June 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Muralikrishna and ors. Vs. Telugu University, Hyderabad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD1
S.R Nayak, J. 1. The unsuccessful writ petitioners in WP No.11252 of 1996 have filed this writ appeal assailing the validity of the order of the learned single Judge dated 13-4-1997 made in the said writ petition. The petitioners filed the above writ petition questioning the action of the 1st reponedent-Telugu University, in issuing the proceedings No.TU/Admn./II/96, dated 22-3-1996 appointing the 3rd respondent as Deputy Librarian. The dispute relates to the appointment of the 3rd respondent to the post of Deputy Librarian in the 1st respondent-University. The background facts leading to the filing of this writ appeal be noted briefly as under.2. The 1st respondent-University issued notifications on 11-9-1993 and 2-4-1994 calling for applications from eligible candidates for appointment to the posts of Deputy Librarian and Assistant Librarian. The petitioners and Mr. M. Ramchander, the 3rd respondent herein applied for the post of Deputy Librarian. The 3rd respondent was appointed as ...
J. Mohan Roy (Died) Per Lrs and ors. Vs. N. Raj Kumari Padmini Devi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD281; 2002(6)ALT518
L. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful plaintiff in OS No.44 of 1988 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Nellore. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The plaintiff (who since died and whose LRs are brought on record) filed the suit for the relief of declaration that the settlement deed dated 28-7-1965 executed in favour of the defendant was not acted upon and that the plaint schedule property belongs to the plaintiff and sought for consequential injunction. It was pleaded that the defendant is the foster sister of the plaintiff and at the time of her marriage a deed of settlement was executed on 28-7-1965 gifting the suit schedule property admeasuring Ac 5.00. It is the case of the plaintiff that though the deed was executed, the possession of the property was not delivered and the plaintiff continued to exercise rights of ownership uninterruptedly and even otherwise his possession subsequent to 28-7-1965 can b...
State of A.P. and ors. Vs. Sagar Cements Limited, Mattampalli, Nalgond ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD136; 2002(6)ALT180
S.R.K. Prasad, J. 1. Originally a Division Bench of this Court in a batch of writ appeals including WA Nos.458 and 459 of 1990 referred the matter to Full Bench doubting the correctness of the decision rendered in Sagar Cements Limited v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1989-III ALT 677). Thereafter, the matter came up before the Full Bench on 9-3-1998. The Full Bench directed the matter to be posted before a Division Bench. 2. The respondents are the appellants herein . WP No. 3276/89 is presented against the refusal to receive and register the sale deeds relating to the land bearing S.Nos.428/AA and S.No. 202 of Mattampalle and Pedaveedu villages respectively. The petitioner in the said writ petition is said to have purchased Ac.8.10 guntas in S.No. 429-AA of Mattampalli village adjoining the compound wall of petitioners plant belonging to three owners namely (1) Golamari Sowrireddy; (2) Tirumallareddy Chinnapareddy and (3) Tirumalareddy Bala Reddy at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per acre. Golam...
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyd. and Anr. Vs. Se ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD356
S.R. Nayak, J.1. WA 1296 of 1993 filed by the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 10th October 1993 in WP No. 10213 of 1989. The respondent herein - Secunderabad Bunks (KIOSKS) Owners Association represented by its General Secretary filed the above writ petition praying for the following relief;'Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or directions of like nature directing the respondents herein (a) not to interfere with the trade and business of the members of petitioner-Association, Secunderabad bunks (KIOSKS) Owners Association represented by its General Secretary N.R. Mouli son of Laxmaiah, aged 60 years resident of H.No.7-2-156 Ashoknagar, Secunderabad - 500 003 consisting of 76 m...
Neelambar Ropeways Vs. Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD16; 2002(5)ALT228
S.R Nayak, J.1. M/s. Neelambar Ropeways, a registered partnership firm, being aggrieved by the order of a learned single Judge of this Court in WP No.26047 of 2001, dated 18-2-2002 has filed this writ appeal. The appellant was the petitioner in the writ petition. The appellant herein filed the above writ petition praying for writ of mandamus declaring the refusal of the Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Limited, the 1st respondent herein to consider the bid of the appellant submitted pursuant to Bid No.APTDCL/TVZ Projects/RW/2001, dated 9-4-2001, as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the 1st respondent to consider the bid of the petitioner. The said writ petition by the order impugned in the writ appeal is dismissed by the learned single Judge.2. The relevant background facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as follows: The I st respondent-Corporation floated an open tender for selection of an investor for design, finance, construction...
The Branch Manager, L.i.C. of India, Kodad and anr. Vs. Ambati Laxmamm ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: I(2003)ACC194; 2003ACJ2131; AIR2002AP479; 2002(5)ALT412
G. Yethirajulu, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.23 of 1996 on the file of the District Judge, Nalgonda preferred against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.46 of 1994 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Miryalguda.2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.60,000/- payable under an Endowment Assurance Policy given by the Life Insurance Corporation in the name of her late husband.3. According to the plaintiff, her husband late A.Narsi Reddy obtained an endowment assurance policy for a sum of Rs.50,000/- on 20-3-1990 and the policy was issued by the defendant Corporation on 31-5-1990. While so, the plaintiff's husband died on 9-11-1993 due to ill-health leaving behind the plaintiff and two sons.By the date of the death of her husband the policy was in force. Therefore the plaintiff made a claim before the defendant Corporation, but the defend...
Chenna Reddy and anr. Vs. P. Ram Reddy and 3 ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD748; 2002(3)ALT748
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.14 of 1989 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Vikarababad preferred against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.121 of 1981 on the file of the District Munsif, Chevalla.2. The appellants are the defendants and respondents are the plaintiffs in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit for recovery of possession of the suit lands. According to the plaintiffs they are the owners of the suit schedule property. The defendants are their cousin brothers and the lands were given to them on battai for a period of two years commencing from June 1978. After the end of the agricultural season, the plaintiffs asked the defendants to handover possession of the suit lands, but the defendants failed to do so. Hence the suit for recovery of the suit lands.3. The defendants while resisting the suit denied the lease of the suit lands on battai basis and pleaded exchange of the suit schedule lands in their favour on the...
Maheswaram Laxmi (Since Died) Rep. by Her Lrs. Vs. Maheswaram Krishna ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD289; 2002(3)ALT789
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Siddipet in A.S.No.7 of 1993 preferred against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.317 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif, Siddipet.2. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondent herein is the defendant in the suit. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died and his L.Rs. were brought on record as appellants 2 to 4. During the pendency of the appeal, the 2nd appellant also died. Therefore, his L.Rs. were also brought on record as appellants 5 to 9.3. The plaintiff filed the present suit for declaration that the judgment and decree in O.S.No.266 of 1987 dated 29-7-1987 on the file of the District Munsif, Siddipet is obtained by playing fraud by the defendant and alternatively for cancellation of the said decree.4. The averments of the plaint are briefly as follows The plaintiff's husband late Maheswaram Lakshminarsaiah was the paternal uncle of the defendant. The...
Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD501; [2003(96)FLR160]; (2002)IIILLJ392AP
S.R. Nayak, J.1. The unsuccessful petitioners in WP Nos.1866 of 1989, 13628 of 1990, 9596 of 1990, 2313 of 1990, 13426 of 1994, 4968 of 1990, 4410 of 1990, 13515 of 1990 and 6207 of 1991 have filed WA Nos.94 of 2000, 1058 of 2000 and 2039 to 2044 of 1999 respectively assailing the validity and correctness of the order of the learned single Judge dated 27-9-1999 dismissing the above writ petitions. The petitioner in WP No. 1866 of 1989, viz., M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited, who is the appellant in WA No.94 of 2000, has assailed the validity and legality of G.O. Ms. No. 914, Labour, Employment and Technical Education (Lab.II) Department dated 24-8-1978 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in exercise of the power conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (for short, the Act), abolishing contract labour in M/s. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited, Garividi, Srikakuiam District, in certain operations mentioned in the sa...
Bysani Anjaneyulu Vs. Trilinga Technical and Management Consultant (Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD461; 2003(1)ALT248
S.R. Nayak, J.1. I have read in draft the judgment of my learned Brother L. Narasimha Reddy, J. With considerable diffidence, however, I am unable to agree with His Lordship's opinion to allow the appeal and set aside the order of the learned Company Judge dated 13-5-2001 in CA No. 475 of 2001, and, therefore, I propose to state my reasons for the dissent.2. At the threshold, the question regarding maintainability of this appeal was raised by Sri S. Ramachandra Rao, learned senior Counsel appearing for 1st respondent and, therefore, it becomes necessary for us to decide that question in the first instance.3. This OSA is filed under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act'), against the order of the learned Company Judge in CA No. 475 of 2001 in CA No. 53 of 1999 in RCC No. 8 of 1998 dated 13-5-2001. The appellant, namely, Bysani Anjaneyulu, was not a party in the Company Application and he has preferred this appeal seeking leave of the Court. The background facts le...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »