Andhra Pradesh Court April 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hylam Employees Consumer Co.Op. Stores Vs. Additional Industrial Tribu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT742
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The above two writ petitions have been preferred by the Management. W.P. No. 12924 of 1994 pertains to M.P. No. 167 of 1988 wherein the workman claimed Rs. 32,500/- under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') before the Additional Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad. The said M.P. was allowed by the Tribunal awarding a sum of Rs. 32,500/- on 19th October, 1993, towards subsistence allowance, bonus and salary from the date of suspension i.e., 27-7-1988, Whereas W.P. No. 13189 of 1996 pertains to M.P. No. 39 of 1984 wherein the workman claimed Rs. 63,813/- towards the subsistence allowance for the total period of 33 months i.e., from September, 1988 to May 1991 at the rate of Rs. 650/- p.m. which comes to Rs. 21,450/-, wages as per the orders passed in S.C. No. 14 of 1991 from 31-5-1991 till date i.e., upto 1994 at the rate of Rs. 810/- p.m., which comes to Rs. 33,210/- and towards V.D.A. benefit from April 1991 to O...
M.A. Raoof Vs. A.P. High Court, Through Its Registrar General
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD(Cri)653; 2002(3)ALT324
AR. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. The writ petition was filed by one Sri M.A. Raoof represented by Sri Mohd. Osman Shaheed, Advocate for a mandamus declaring the impugned order passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide Roc. No. 3239/E1/2000 dated 7-3-2002 as contrary to law and consequently to set aside the same.2. It is averred in the writ petition that the police of P.S., Moghalpura, Hyderabad has registered a case against the petitioner and others Under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code read with Sections 7 and 8 of the Explosives Substance Act vide Crime No. 1 of 2000 and has laid charge-sheet against the petitioner and other accused and the case was registered S.C. No. 382 of 2000. The said case is pending on the file of Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Cases-cum Additional Family Court, Hyderabad. It is submitted that the prosecution has already examined almost all the witnesses and the trial is about to be concluded soon. Likewise, a...
Sham Kumar Vs. Ayyagari Krishna Murthy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2002
Reported in: 2003(6)ALT331
L. Narsimha Reddy, J.1. In this appeal, the 1st defendant in O.S.No. 554 of 1976 on the file of the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, challenges the Judgment and decree passed therein.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiffs (respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein) filed the suit pleading as under:3. One Smt. Lakshmi Narasamma, the mother of the father of the plaintiffs was the absolute owner of the suit schedule property admeasuring about 385 square yards situated at Ramkoti, Hyderabad. She purchased the said property during the course of execution of decree in O.S.No. 25 of 1958 on the file of II Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. During her lifetime, she executed a Will dated 10-3-1960 which was registered after her death. According to the bequests under the Will, the grandfather of the plaintiffs by name A. Brahmanandam was to have life interest in the said property. After his demise, the sister of Smt. L...
Government of A.P. and anr. Vs. N. Garudeshwara Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD81; 2002(3)ALT651
S.R. Nayak, J.1. This writ appeal by the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by Secretary to Government, Education Department and the Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Hyderabad, is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 28-12-1996 made in WP No. 21613 of 1996. The respondents 1 to 19 herein are the writ petitioners. They filed the writ petition for the following relief:'.....the High Court will be pleased to issuean appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in not fixing our salary by giving notional increments, by treating the entire service rendered by the petitioners from the dates of petitioner respective appointments as part time Lecturers regular service in terms of the judgment of this Hon'ble Court made in WA No. 642 of 1988 dated 8-3-1991 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to us under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential di...
V. Ravinder Vs. Regional Manager, Apsrtc and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD127; (2003)ILLJ483AP
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J. 1. The appellant is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 9605 of 1999. The appellant not being satisfied with the relief granted by the learned single Judge in the impugned order has preferred this writ appeal for further relief.2. In the writ petition the appellant sought for the following relief:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in regularising petitioners services only with effect from 19-4-1994 vide order dated 19-6-1994 instead of regularising petitioner service from the date on which the petitioner completed (240) days of service from the date of petitioner initial appointment and consequently direct the respondents to regularize petitioner service from the date on which he completed (240) days of service ...
Zarina and ors. Vs. Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Lan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD558
E. Dharma Rao, J. 1. 96 residents of Vidyadharpuram village of Vijayawada Town filed this writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent - Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Vijayawada, in issuing the proceedings RC No, A2/309/96, dated 30-10-1996 purporting to keep the No Objection Certificates issued under Section 26 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for brevity the Act) in respect of land in RS No. 20/P of Vidyadharpuram, Vijayawada, in abeyance and to direct the respondents 2 and 3 i.e., the District Registrar, Vijayawada and Sub-Registrar, Gandhinagar, Vijayawada, (sic 'not') to entertain any sale deed for registration in respect of the said land, is arbitrary and illegal and to consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to entertain the registration of sale documents which may be presented by the petitioners in respect of the said Sy.No.2. Factual matrix, in a narrow compass, is as under. T...
Bendalam Narayanamurthy and ors. Vs. Srikakulam Co-operative Central B ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD586
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the plaintiffs in an un-numbered suit challenging the order of the trial Court in rejecting the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC.2. The relevant facts may be briefly stated as under :3. The respondent, Srikakulam Cooperative Central Bank appears to have instituted proceedings under the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act before the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tekkali, tor recovery of certain amounts from one Mr. Badagala Krishnamurty. In 1951 they obtained an order of attachment. The suit schedule property was ultimately brought to sale and the respondent purchased it on 19-2-1963. Inspite of purchase it could not recover possession. Therefore, the respondent filed O.S.No.7 of 1975 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Srikakulam for recoveryof possession of the suit schedule Property. The suit was decreed. The respondent filed E.P.No.55 of 1976 for execution of decree. The execution was ordered and possession was delive...
Nalamuru Nadipi Subbanna Vs. Kataru Chennamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD859
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Proddatur in AS 21 of 1988 preferred against the judgment and decree in OS 86 of 1974 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Proddatur. The appellants is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants. The appeal is respect of R2 to R6 is dismissed for default through the order dated 22-3-1994.2. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition of the suit schedule property in two equal shares and to put him in possession of one such share. The 1st defendant alienated the suit schedule property to defendants 3 to 6, therefore, they are also impleaded as parties in the suit.3. The plaintiff contended that the 1st defendant, one Giddaluru Naga Munaiah and himself jointly purchased an extent of 22 cents of land out of 66 cents in S.No.431/B1 of Proddatur town under a registered sale deed dated 4-7-1962 and they are in joint possession of the same. The 2nd defendant who is t...
Sol Pharmaceuticals Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director, Sri. Chand ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD(Cri)900; [2002]111CompCas845(AP)
ORDERGopalakrishna Tamada, J. 1. The petitioners herein who are A-1 to A-3 in S.T.C. No.21of 1998 on the file of the Court of Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, seek quashing of the said proceedings on the ground that launching of prosecution against the petitioners herein is an abuse of the process of the court. 2. The case, according to the complaint filed by the Registrar of Companies, is that the 1st petitioner is a company represented by its Managing Director of which the 2nd petitioner is one of the Directors and the 3rd petitioner is the Secretary. According to the complaint, in the Annual General Meeting held on 27-9-196, the company declared dividend @ 30% but failed to pay the same to the shareholders within 42 days as mandated under Section 207 of the Companies Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. C. Praveen Kumar contended before this court that it is true that dividend was declared by the company but the same could not be paid in time as mandate...
Private Medical Practitioners' Association of A.P. Vs. Govt. of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-2002
Reported in: AIR2003AP1; 2002(3)ALT740
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. Private Medical Practitioners' Association of Andhra Pradesh, Regd. No. 2225/94, Karimnagar represented by its President S.K. Habibuddin, seeks invalidation of the proceedings of the District Medical, Health and Family Welfare Officer, Karimnagar, the 2nd respondent dated 21-4-1995.2. By the said proceedings the 2nd respondent, pursuant to the memo of the Government dated 30-3-1995, directed all the medical officers of Primary Health Centres, Civil Dispensaries and Civil Hospitals working in the District to identify and prepare a list of medical practitioners under their jurisdiction having qualifications and to take action against the unlicensed practitioners practising medicine under their jurisdiction and to take the police help to hook them. The Impugned circular also directs the officers to submit the action taken report in this regard to the 2nd respondent every month.3. The petitioner contends that their Association is comprised of rural medical practiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »