Andhra Pradesh Court April 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chintala Galimallaiah Vs. the State of A.P., Through Public Prosecutor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD(Cri)698; 2002CriLJ3123
ORDERGopala Krishna Tamada, J. 1. In this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner requests this court to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.76 of 1999 pending on the file of the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Janagaon, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 447 I.P.C. and Section 3 (1) of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977. 2. The allegations in the charge sheet are as follows: The Government allotted a house plot measuring 190 Square yards in S. No.53/1, vide Plot No.138 under assignment to one Chinthalagalli Mallaiah of Jangaon as he is a houseless poor and delivered possession to him. As per the assignment rules, the said assigned land shall not be transferred to any person and in the event of any such transfer, both the seller and the purchaser are liable to be punished. It is further alleged that the petitioner having knowledge about the said Rule, 'purchased the said assigned plot from the said beneficiary, trespassed into the assigned ...
M. Nageswara Rao Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2002
Reported in: III(2003)ACC569; 2004ACJ1554; 2003(3)ALD397; 2003(3)ALT603
B.S.A. Swamy, J. 1. The owner of the vehicle is the appellant before this Court. He filed this LPA assailing the order of the learned Single Judge in AAO No. 1904/89 dated 13.11.1997 wherein the order of the Tribunal apportioning the compensation payable by the owner and the Insurance Company to the third parties was reversed and the entire liability to pay the compensation was fastened on the insurer (i.e.) the owner of the vehicle. 2. The facts are not in dispute. The truck that was involved in the accident was insured with the 1st respondent under policy No. 4256106318 4256106318 on 28.12.1985 and the same is in force up to 27.12.1986. Before expiry of the insurance policy the appellant herein issued a cheque on 28.12.1985 for a sum of Rs. 3343/- for renewal of the insurance policy by one more year. But the cheque seemed to have been returned by the bank with an endorsement 'not arranged for' by its note dated 2.1.1986, which was marked Ex.B2. It is the case of the respondent insura...
Mantri Rajaiah Vs. M. Bhola Shankar and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALT441
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 1877 of 1988 on the file of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The plaintiffs filed the suit for partition. The father of the plaintiffs by name Pentaiah and defendants 1 to 3 are the 4 sons of one Mr. Pochaiah. According to the plaintiffs, the joint family comprising of Pochaiah and his sons acquired 3 items of immovable properties namely two residential houses situated at Gollaguda and Kalasiguda (Item Nos. 1 and 2) and an open site of 600 yds., at Srinivasanagar Colony (Item No. 3) and therefore, the plaintiffs jointly have 1/4th share in each of these 3 items.3. The 1st defendant filed a written statement claiming that items 1 and 2 are his self-acquired properties. According to him Item No. 1 was purchased by him in the name of his mother Gunnamma. He has also stated that he paid th...
A. Sambi Reddy Vs. Government of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD424; 2002(3)ALT568
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is a practising lawyer, who was enrolled in the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh in the year 1984. He submitted an application on 8-9-2000 to the 2nd respondent, the competent authority, for appointment as Notary in respect of Siddardha Nagar area under Notaries Act, 1952 (for short 'the Act') as well as the Notaries Rules, 1956 (for short 'the Rules'). The application was duly processed and the 2nd respondent published a notification dated 30-3-2001 in the A.P. Gazette calling for objections. The notification reads as under:Lr. No. NRI/21479/2000 - Under Rule 4(1) of the Notaries Rules, 1956, the Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps who has been appointed as competent authority to receive. application for appointment as Notary has received an application from Sri A. Sambi Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, Advocate for appointment as Notary in respect of Sidhartha Nagar in Vengalrao Nagar, Hyderabad. In pursuance of Rules 6(2)(a) of No...
Garlapati Hanumayamma Vs. Paladugu Raghavaiah (Died), Tenancy Appellat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD727
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. This writ appeal filed by the landlady is directed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 19-1-2001 in Writ Petition No. 3595 of 1996. The appellant is the petitioner in the writ petition. 2. The background facts leading to the filing of the writ petition be noted briefly as under: 3. The appellant's husband owned 12 acres of land in Survey No. 41/3 of Pedagarlapadu Village. The said land was leased out to the 1st respondent herein on an annual rent of Rs. 150/- per acre. The said lease was oral. The 1st respondent was not paying the rents regularly. Normally, the rent was payable during Ugadi days. It is the case of the appellant that due to the advent of Nagarjunsagar canals, the appellant's husband desired to reclaim the land into wet land and accordingly asked the 1st respondent to take up the reclamation work in an area of about eight acres. The 1st respondent could not convert the said land into wet and pleaded his inability. It is the case of the ...
Syed Ale Mossa Raza and ors. Vs. Razia Begum and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2002
Reported in: AIR2003AP2; 2003(1)ALT100
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S. No. 164/76 are the appellants in the appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, some of the plaintiffs as well as defendants in the suit died and their legal representatives are brought on record. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as the plaintiff and defendants.2. Briefly stated, the facts are as under :--The father of plaintiffs, late Syed Shah Abdul Khader, was the pattedar and landlord of land in S. No. 129/55 (old). New Survey No. 165, situated at Kancha Tattikhana Sivar, village Shaikpet, Hyderabad Urban Taluq, admeasuring Ac. 3-65 guntas. The patta was transferred by Sarfekhas Mubarak on 25th Azur, 1340 Fasli. Syed Shah Abdul Khader executed a registered settlement deed dated 10th Aban. 1347 Fasli in favour of his wife Fatima Sogra, the mother of the plaintiffs. The said Fatima Sogra has been in continuous and exclusive possession of the same till she died on 24th July, 1973. On the death of the ...
K. Sudhakara Rao Vs. Apsrtc and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT719
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and to quash the proceedings issued by the 4th respondent in G.O.Rt. No. 870, dt. 22-4-1997 in I.D. No. 518/94 as illegal, arbitrary, void and against the principles of natural justice and direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service along with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders.2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition that the petitioner was a displaced worker. He was recruited as Casual Driver on 16-5-1990 at Tuni Depot and his services were regularised on 1-8-1993. At the time of recruitment, he was asked by the recruiting authorities to produce evidence in support of his age and fearing that the non-production of Education certificate might deprive him of the job, he had produced a false educational certificate. While matters stood thus, the petitioner was stopped from working as...
R.V.K. Energy Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. A.P.S.E.B., Hyderabad and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD196; 2002(2)ALT439
1. In all the three Civil Misc. Appeals a common point is involved except a little variation in the appeals and, therefore, they are disposed of by a common judgment.2. The aforesaid appeals are filed against the orders of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (for brivity 'Regulatory Commission'). C.M.A.No.1458 of 2000 is filed against the order passed in O.P.No.2 of 1999 dated 31-3-2000 by a Company known as M/s. R.V.K. Energy (P) Ltd., and C.M.A.No.1553 of 2000 is filed by the share holders and consumers of the appellant company in C.M.A.No.1458 of 2000. C.M.A.No.2062 of 2000 is filed by a company known as M/s. Astha Power Corporation (P) Ltd., It is necessary to narrate the background of this litigation. The A.P. State Government formulated a policy for augmenting the power supply to ensure industrial growth by setting up of Mini Power Plants by private entrepreneurs under certain terms and conditions as given in G.O.Ms.No.116, Energy (Power) Department, dated 5-8-19...
M.K. Azad and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD(Cri)883
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J. 1. This is a petition to quash the proceedings in Crime No.55 of 2002 of Panjagutta Police Station.2. On 17-1-2002, 2nd respondent lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police, Panjagutta Police Station alleging that he is the Managing Director of R.D.F.Power Project Limited (for short the Company) having its registered office at 318, Amrutha Ville Apartments, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, and that petitioners 1 to 3who have been making false claim as Directors of the company have been pressurizing him to hand over the Management of the company to them had on 3-1-2002 at about 4 P.M., came to the company premises with the fourth petitioner who is claiming himself to be the representative of a Malaysian based company, and the fifth petitioner, a Chartered Accountant, and threatened him with dire consequences if he were not to hand over the charge of the company along with the records to them (i.e., petitioners 1 to 3) immediately, and apprehending threat to his life...
inspector-General of Registration and Stamps, Hyderabad Vs. Andhra Pra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD141; 2002(3)ALT245
S.R. NAYAK, J. 1. This writ appeal, by the Inspector-General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 14-8-2000 in WP No.4134 of 1994. Andhra Pradesh State Document Writers' Association (Regd), the 1st respondent herein filed the above writ petition praying for the following relief:'Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the proceedings of the respondent bearing No.DW/34770 of 1993 dated 15-12-1993 in so far it prohibited the entry of a document writer under any circumstances into the compound of the office of the Sub-Registrar or on its veranda as mentioned in para 5 of the said proceedings as arbitrary, illegal, without authority of law and violativ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »