Andhra Pradesh Court March 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Erlapalli Prakasham Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2002
Reported in: III(2002)ACC227
ORDERS.R.K. Prasad, J.1. This criminal revision case is directed against the judgment in Crl. Appeal No. 54 of 1997 dated 6.7.2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Khammarn confirming the conviction and sentence imposed against him by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu in C.C. No. 524 of 1995 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 304-A, I.P.C., two months for the offence under Section 338, I.P.C., one month for the offence under Section 7, I.P.C. and also imposition of fine of Rs. 100/- for the offence under Section 252 r/w Section 177 of the Motor Vehicles Transport Rules, 1989 in default to suffer S.I. for fifteen day.2. The case of-the prosecution in brief is that on 19.2.1995 at about 4.45 a.m. due to the rash and negligent driving of the Matador van bearing No. AP 20 T 2388 by the revision petitioner-accused, it turned turtle and fell into a ditch. As a result of which Poddoji Nagamani, Mogili Rambabu and Nancherla Bhagyam...
P. Ilesh Yadav Vs. P. Suvarna and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD(Cri)606; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)29; I(2003)DMC752
ORDERS.R.K. Prasad, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Revision-Petitioner. This revision is preferred by the husband against the orders passed in M.C.No.1 of 1998 by the Family Court, Secunderabad, awarding maintenance of Rs.500/- per month from the date of filing of petition i.e., 5-1-1998. 2. It is undisputed fact that the marriage of revision petitioner with the first respondent took place on 31-3-1994 as per Hindu rites and customs. It is also equally not disputed that prior to marriage betrothal ceremony was performed on 18-4-1993. The revision petitioner is said to be working as a linemen in telephones department. It is alleged that at the time of marriage, the parents of the 1st respondent gave RS.5,000/- in cash and presented Bajaj Chetak Scooter and house hold articles, 11 tulas of gold ornaments to the revision petitioner. They spent Rs.75,000/- towards marriage expenses. It is further alleged that the parents of the 1st respondent presented Rs.1,000/- towards clothes a...
M.A. Rasheed and anr. Vs. T.S. Mahaboob Basha
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD301; 2002(3)ALT293
ORDERG. Rohini, J. 1. This civil revision petition arises out of execution proceedings in furtherance of a money decree obtained by the respondent herein.2. The judgment debtors in EP No. 39 of 1997 are the petitioners in this revision petition which is directed against the order dated 14-11-2000 made in EA No. 56 of 2000 in EP No. 39 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the VII Senior Civil Judge, Hyderabad permitting the decree holder to amend the schedule to the execution petition.3. The facts, which are not in dispute and relevant for the purpose of determination of the question raised in this revision petition, are as follows:The respondent herein filed OS No. 111 of 1993 on the file of the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Kurnool against the petitioners herein for recovery of Rs. 8,17,990/- and the same was decreed on 14-11-1996. Pending the said suit, the plaintiff filed IA No. 308 of 1993 under Order 38, Rule 5 of CPC and got attached a house of the defendants before ju...
Executive Director, District Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Soci ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALD116; [2002(94)FLR541]
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. The writ petition is filed questioning the award dated 11-10-1995 made by 1st respondent in ID No. 550 of 1991 on the ground that it is arbitrary and illegal and also for other appropriate reliefs. 2. The facts in brief are as follows: 3. The A.P. Scheduled Caste Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad, in short referred to as 'Corporation' hereinafter, had been constituted and registered in the year 1974 under the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, hereinafter in short referred to as ''Co-operative Societies Act' and the sole object of the Corporation is to evolve certain developmental schemes out of the funds provided by the Central and State Governments and to implement the same for the upliftment of the Scheduled Caste beneficiaries and no doubt several other details also had been narrated in this regard. A reference also is made to the circular issued by the Corporation stipulating the staffing pattern to the District Societies. It is also ...
Neelam @ Bendila Lachaiah and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Through Sho of P. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD(Cri)539
ORDERGopala Krishna Tamada, J. 1. The petitioners herein were tried as A-1 and A-2 in S.C. No. 98 of 1996 by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli, for the offence punishable under Section 306 I.P.C. After examining the evidence of P.Ws.1 to 11 and Exs.P-1 to P-9, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge held the petitioners guilty of the offence punishable under Section 306 I.P.C. and accordingly sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and also to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month each. In appeal, the learned Sessions Judge, confirmed the same. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased by name Gondeti Rajaiah along with his wife Rajamma (P.W.2) and father-in-law of the deceased by name Ramaiah (P.W.4) went to Rajampet village to attend the marriage of the daughter of one Neeli Kommuramma. The said marriage took place on 12-5-1995 at the house of Neeli Komuramma in Rajampet...
Kuppam Chalapathi Rao Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Pub ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD(Cri)338; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)565
ORDERS.R.K. Prasad, J. 1. This revision is preferred by the accused against the conviction and sentence of S.I for one year and imposition of fine of Rs.3,000/- in default. I for two months for the offence u/s. 304A IPC and further fine of Rs.500/- in default S.I for two weeks for the offence u/s. 337 IPC awarded by the I Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Narasaraopet, in C.C.No. 169/99 and also as confirmed by the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur, in Crl. A. No. 150/98. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused left with his jeep bearing No. AP 71 2443 on 6-7-1997 from Chilakaluripet to go over to Narasaraopet in a rash and negligent manner and went to the extreme left side of the road with a view to overtake the vehicle going ahead, resulting in the jeep turning turtle. It lead to the death of Garnepudi Issac Abraham and Thelukutla Anantha Narayana, and also injuries to K.Venkateswara Rao and Lakireddy Anantharami Reddy. The accused pleaded not guilty for the offences u/s. 304A and...
Yerasi Ankamma Vs. K.L. Syama Sunder Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2004(2)ALT32
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In this appeal, the judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Nandyal, in O.S.No. 104 of 1989, is in challenge. The plaintiff is the appellant. The parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The plaintiff filed the suit claiming that she is the 2nd wife of late Bala Venkata Reddy (for short 'BV Reddy'), the 1st wife, late Eswaramma died some time during 1974 and BV Reddy died on 17-4-1988. It is her case that late B.V. Reddy was the absolute owner of the suit schedule properties, he died intestate and she succeeded to the suit schedule properties.3. It is the case of the plaintiff that the 1st defendant had laid claim to the properties of her husband under a Will dated 19-11 -1978 said to have been executed by her husband. She stated that the alleged Will is not true and genuine and was brought into existence by the 1st respondent. She has also denied the claim of the 1st defendant to be foster son of her husband. She narrated the va...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›