Andhra Pradesh Court March 2002 Judgments

P. Krishnam Raju Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderab ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD494; 2002(4)ALT247

ORDER1. The petitioner claims to be the owner of Ac.8-00 of agricultural land, comprised in Sy. Nos. 432, 433 and 439 of Aliabad Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner states that it is an ancestral property, that he is conducting agricultural operations therein by raising fruit bearing plants and others plantations. The petitioner further states that he raised loans from Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society for digging a bore well in the said land.2. The petitioner states that some builders, who purchased impure sand from various areas, requested him to undertake the process of cleaning of the sand and for removal of the impurities. He therefore, constructed two filter beds or sumps (incorrectly described as 'slump' in the affidavit) with brick masonry upto a height of 5 from the ground level. The sand is cleaned by way of pumping water into the first sump, filled with sand, and as a result, the impurities, waste particles and earthen soil get accumulated i...

Abdul Razak Chand Vs. Mohammed Sayeed and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD572

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In this appeal, the 3rd defendant in OS No.486 of 1983 on the file of the 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, challenges the judgment and decree therein. The parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The plaintiff/respondent filed the suit tor declaration of title in respect of the suit schedule property. According to him, the 1st defendant was the absolute owner of the property. She being the sister of his mother made an oral gift of the suit property on 2-1-1981. Since the parties are Muslims, oral gift is permissible. He was put in possession and ever since the date of gift, he has been enjoying the property. It was further pleaded that the 1st defendant executed a registered settlement deed dated 2-6-1981 in favour of the 2nd defendant, who is her grand daughter, he said settlement deed, however, was revoked by the 1st defendant through another deed dated 24-8-1981. On the same day, she is alleged to have executed a sale deed in favour of...

T.N. Ramakrishnan Vs. Bank of India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALT617

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The petitioner has hailed from Kerala State. He has his early education at the Government Lower Secondary School, Nadavaramba, Trichur District, Kerala State. He had his high school education from the Government Boys' High School, Irinjalakuda, Trichur District, Kerala State during the years 1946 to 1949. He passed his Metriculation Examination that was conducted in April 1949. Trichur District was forming part of the Princely State of Cochin. Secondary School Leaving Certificate bearing Serial No. 46844 was issued by the Director of Public Instruction, Trichur. The 1st page of the SSLC certificate was prepared in the school and in so far as his date of birth is concerned, the entries were made by the Headmaster of the institution in his own hand while the rest of the information against the other columns was recorded by the office staff of the said school. Against column-4 viz., 'Date of Birth (to be written in words also)', '8-6-1108, Eighth Makaram, Eleven...

Vishnu Mor Vs. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(4)ALT746

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.INTRODUCTION:1. This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the notices issued by the first respondent bearing Rc.No. 143/ 99-G3 dt. 9-02-1999 and 13-12-1999 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the orders of this Court. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in an extent of Acs. 1.05 in S.No. 292/1, 292/3, 292/4 and 294/7C. By the impugned notices the petitioner was requested by the first respondent to stop unauthorised construction immediately and obtain approval from the Shore Area Development Authority, the third respondent, (hereinafter called, SADA).BACKGROUND FACTS-PLEADINGS:2. The brief facts leading to filing of the writ petition be noted as follows. Mother of the petitioner purchased the property in question in 1987 under five registered sale deed's. The property is situated outside the Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation limits, approximately 25 K...

Kommuri Vamana Rao and anr. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(5)ALT595

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The writ petition is filed questioning the order passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dt. 3-12-2001 in I.A.No. 1873 of 2001 in C.M.A. SR.No. 10786 of 2001 dismissing the application to condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal. A consequential direction is also sought to direct the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, the Appellate Authority, to take appeal on file and dispose of the same after setting aside the order in I.A.No. 1873 of 2001.2. The facts in brief necessary for disposal of the writ petition may be noticed. The father of the petitioners late Raja Rao was in possession of the land admeasuring 120 Sq. yards being eastern portion of premises bearing No. 6-1-69/1, Saifabad, Hyderabad since 1963. It is alleged that they enjoyed all easementary rights and was lawfully inducted by the second respondent -M/s. Happy Service Centre, a retail petroleum outlet of the first respondent corporation (Hindustan Petroleum Corporat...

Sunrise Industries Vs. Subhadra Engineering Works, Mechanical Engineer ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD24; 2002(3)ALT296

Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1. This writ petition has been filed to quash the judgment dated 14-8-2001 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in Arbitration Application No.47 of 2001 and consequently to appoint a sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties arising out of the contract of supply, installation and trial run of the machinery by respondent-company at the factory premises of the petitioner vide quotation reference No.SEW/275/98-99, dated 17-2-1999.2. Rule nisi was issued by this Court on 12-9-2001. When the matter was called on 18-10-2001 nobody appeared for the respondent despite service of notice; however, the case was adjourned to enable the office to verify as to whether anybody has filed vakalat for the respondent. On 30-10-2001 the matter was listed and at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, it was adjourned. Again, on 1-2-2002, the case was listed and it underwent adjournment to 12-2-2002. On 12-2-2002, the matter was heard in part a...

G. Ramanaiah, Ex-serviceman Vs. Deputy Collector and Magistrate and or ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(4)ALT190

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The petitioner is an ex-serviceman. He filed the writ petition, questioning the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 23-12-1989, insofar as the same is against the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and seeks Mandamus directing the respondents to restore the possession of the assigned land of 5 acres in S.No. 123/1 of Thollagangannapalli village, Vallur Mandal, Cuddapah District to the petitioner, who was the original assignee.2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined the Indian Air Force on 18-10-1963 as Soldier and after serving for 18 years he retired as Sergeant on 18-10-1981. While he was in service, the then Tahsildar of Cuddapah in his proceedings BI/DKT/227/ MP/74 dated 25-11-1966, granted D.K. Patta in favour of the petitioner assigning 5 acres of land and he has been cultivating the assigned land by raising Jower crops etc. The petitioner paid land re...

Pulagam Dayakara Reddy Vs. Pulagam Venkata Subbamma

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(4)ALT116; II(2002)DMC787

S.R.K. Prasad, J.1. This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 42 of 1987 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kovur, Nellore District enhancing the maintenance by one putti of paddy or market value thereof per year from the date of the suit in addition to the maintenance of 21/2 putties per year already granted to her.2. The only point that arises for consideration is whether the step-son is under an obligation to maintain the stepmother having a child. The learned counsel for the appellant has drawn my attention to a decision reported in P. Rangaiah v. P. Chinnaiah1, : AIR1970AP33 , the relevant portion reads as under:'From the aforesaid discussion, the following principles of law emerge:-(1) Where one of the members of an undivided Hindu family dies leaving a widow and other coparceners, the widow shall have a right of maintenance against the surviving coparcener or coparceners for the share or interest of her deceased husband in joint family propert...

K. Dasarath Vs. Labour Court-i and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(4)ALT194

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The order dated 27-4-1993 of 1st respondent made in I.D.No. 149/87 is impugned in the present Writ Petition.2. The case of the petitioner in brief is as follows:The petitioner was employed in 2nd respondent-Company and was initially taken into service on 22-3-1985 and though initially he was appointed as probationer it was extended twice and thereafter there had been no specific order extending the probation after 21-9-1985 and the petitioner continued to be employed upto 28-12-1995 when his services were terminated abruptly. Questioning the said termination order the petitioner moved the 1st respondent in. I.D.No. 149/87 on a reference made by the Government of A.P. The 2nd respondent had taken a stand that the petitioner was an extended probationer even after 21-9-1985 and he was terminated on the ground that his work was unsatisfactory, The 1st respondent had negatived the relief to the petitioner and aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed...

Harini Enterprises Vs. B. Satyavani and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

C.P. Suresh, Member: 1. The unsuccessful second opposite party in O.P. No. 341/1993 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Khammam, is the appellant in F.A. No. 685/1997 before this Commission. The unsuccessful first opposite party in O.P. No. 341/1993 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Khammam, is the appellant in F.A. No. 860/1997 before this Commission. 2. The facts in brief are, the complainant, a resident of Yellandu X Roads, Khammam Town, purchased an auto bearing No. AP-20/1459, Chassis No. 12264, Engine No. 081662742 manufactured by the second opposite party in June, 1992 from its dealer, the first opposite party. The second opposite party has got a show room opposite the Sessions Court Building at Wyra Road, Khammam Town. A certificate evidencing the sale of the aforesaid auto was issued in favour of the complainant. 3. The auto could be plied only for a period of two months without any trouble. Two months after its purchase on 27.11.1992, it gave trouble and sud...