Andhra Pradesh Court February 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Mangathayaramma and ors. Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: (2002)175CTR(AP)291; [2002]255ITR127(AP)
S.R. Nayak, J.1. The main question that arises for decision in these writ petitions is whether the house property bearing municipal door No. 28/49 situated as Subhash Road, Old Town, Anantapur, hereinafter referred to as the 'petition schedule property', is liable to be sold for recovery of wealth-tax arrears for the assessment years 1982-83 to 1988-89 due from the late Nimmalla Appanna. It is stated that N. Appanna and his father, the late N. Peddanna, were wealth-tax assessees and were residents of Anantapur town.2. It appears that there were wealth-tax arrears to the tune of Rs. 5.5 lakhs owed by N. Appanna in respect of the assessment years 1982-83 to 1988-89. According to the wealth-tax authorities, the above house properties with appurtenant lands belonged to the joint family and were assessed in the hands of N. Appanna, Hindu undivided family (HUF). In connection with the recovery of the said arrears of the wealth-tax, the Tax Recovery Officer, Income-tax Department, issued a pr...
N. Mangathayaramma and ors. Vs. C.H. Krishna Murthy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD43
S.R. Nayak, J.1. The main question that arises for decision in these writ petitions is whether house property bearing Municipal Door No. 28/49 situated at Subhash Road, Old Town, Anantapur, hereinafter referred to as the 'petition schedule property', is liable to be sold for recovery of wealth tax arrears for the2002(3) ALD May Istassessment years 1982-83 to 1988-89 due from late Nimmalla Appanna. It is stated that N. Appanna and his father late N. Peddanna were Wealth Tax assessees and were residents of Anantapur town.2. It appears that there were wealth tax arrears to the tune of Rs.5.5 lakhs owed by N. Appanna in respect of the assessment years 1982-83 to 1988-89. According to the Wealth tax authorities, the above house properties with appurtenant lands belonged to the joint family and were assessed in the hands of N. Appanna, Hindu United Family (HUF). In connection with the recovery of the said arrears of the wealth tax, the Tax Recovery Officer, Income Tax Department, issued a pr...
Gorle Sanyasamma and ors. Vs. District Judge, Visakhapatnam and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD510
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J. 1. This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the orders of first respondent in ATA No.9 of 1987 dated 24-1-1990 as arbitrary and illegal.2. The landlords filed ATP No.22 of 1961 before Deputy Tahsildar, Anakapalli, under A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, for eviction of respondents 3 to 8 tenants on the ground that they had committed default in payment of rents and the same was allowed on 21-11-1964. Aggrieved thereby, the tenants filed appeal in TA No.8 of 1965 which was allowed on 21-11-1971 by Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, setting aside the eviction. However, possession was taken over by the landlords in pursuance of the order in ATP No.22 of 1961. Later, the landlords filed writ petition in WP No.5592 of 1971 and obtained interim stay of the order in TA No.8 of 1965. Subsequently, the said writ petition was dismissed on 23-4-1975. The respondents filed an application under Section 144 of Code of Civil Procedure for restitut...
Dr. Vinod Chandra and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD766
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 27-10-1997 made in WP No. 24150 of 1997. The appellants are the petitioners in the writ petition.2. The backgrounds facts leading to the filing of the writ petition be noted briefly as under: The petitioners are the owners of the premises bearing No. 11-4-660, Mehar Manzil, Red Hills, Hyderabad. The said property was under lease to respondent No. 2. The 1st respondent issued notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) in G.O.Rt. No. 198 dated 3-5-1994, published in A.P. Gazette on 10-5-1994 proposing to acquire an extent of 3050 sq. meters. Thereupon Section (5-A) enquiry was held that the petitioners filed their objections. However, no action was taken. The 1st respondent issued Errata to Section 4(1) Notification published in the press on 19-5-1995 wherein the area was altered as 3780 sq. meters in the place of 3050 sq. meters originally notifi...
A.V. Educational Society Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD716; 2002(2)ALT576
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners have assailed the validity of Rules, 17, 18 and 19 of BarCouncil of India rules, for short 'the Rules' framed by the Bar Council of India by virtue of the power conferred upon it under Sections 7(h) and (i), 24(1)(c)(iii) and (iiia)(9), 49(1)(af)(ag) and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 for short 'the Act'. 2. A.V. Educational Society, a Society registered under Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Act, 1350-Fasli, is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 23603 of 2000 and it had established a Law College by name 'K.V. Ranga Reddy Institute of Law'. The petitioner being aggrieved by the proceedings bearing Lr. No. APSCHE/ Law Colleges/Secy/2000, dated 10-8-2000 of the A.P. State Council for Higher Education, the 2nd respondent in writ petition refusing permission to the petitioner college to convert the 5 year .degree course to 3 year degree course and for switching over from the Evening College to Day College, it is st...
Chereddy Subbamma and ors. Vs. Chereddy Nuchamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALT785
1. These two appeals are at the instance of the defendants against the judgments and decrees, both preliminary and final, in a partition suit in O.S.No.100 of 1983 dated 11-7-1988 and 3-7-1992 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge at Guntur. 2. The suit is filed for partition of plaint A and B schedule properties into two equal shares and for allotment and delivery of possession of one such share to the plaintiffs. Schedule A consists of agricultural lands described as items 1 to 6 admeasuring Ac.9-96 cents and schedule B consists of various movables like bullock cart etc. 3. There is no dispute about the relationship of the parties. One late Chereddy Subba Reddy and Chereddy Yerra Reddy are brothers and sons of Chereddy Veera Reddy. Subba Reddy died in the year 1976 leaving behind his widow, the defendant No.1, one son, the defendant No.2 and one daughter, the defendant No.3. The defendant No.4 is the daughter of the defendant No.3. Yerra Reddy died on 30-1-1983 leaving behi...
Krupa Alloys and Metals Vs. Chief Manager, State Bank of India
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(6)ALT299; [2003]115CompCas133(AP)
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J. 1. The petitioner is a proprietary concern engaged in manufacture and supply of non-ferrous castings. The petitioner obtained amount by way of loan from the respondent-bank. As it was irregular in repayments, the bank filed a suit being O.S. No. 325 of 1995. The suit was decreed ex parte on 6-11-1996 and a preliminary decree was passed. The bank filed an application for final decree. At that stage, the petitioner appears to have filed LA. No. 1068 of 1998 seeking to set aside the ex parte decree. The matter is pending at that stage. In the meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a Circular bearing No. BP.BC 11/21.01.040/99-00 dated 27-7-2000 communicating to the Chairmen and Managing Directors of Public Sector Banks certain guidelines for recovery of dues relating to non-performing assets of public sector banks. The petitioner, therefore, made a representation on 13-10-2000 proposing to accept one-time settlement under the RBI Circular. In his representati...
Ahmed Bi and ors. Vs. Krishna Panduranga Kokil and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD399; 2002(3)ALT314
B. Prakash Rao, J.1. The defendants are the appellants who are aggrieved against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.86 of 1987 & Cross-objections dated 16-12-1989 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kurnool arising out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.416 of 1979 dated 29-7-1987 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Kurnool.2. The respondents filed the suit for permanent injunction against the appellants-defendants restraining them from using the open space 'ABCD' or space over it vertically for the purpose of egress and ingress to the premises bearing No.18/122-A from No.18/124 through doorways 1 and 2 and stairs 'ST' and over bridge 'OB' or by any other device and also for a mandatory injunction for removal of the doorways 1 and 2 and the stair case ST, over bridge 'OB' and water pipe connected to the first floors of premises No.18/124 and 18/122-A.According to the plaintiffs, they are the owners of the premises No.18/123 and 18/122-A1, Rasool Bazar, Kurn...
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Medicorp Technologies India Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD792
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh and its authorities in the Department of Mines and Geology have preferred this writ appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dated 25-7-2000 made in WP No.27891 of 1998. The respondent herein filed the above writ petition for the following relief:'..........the High Court will be pleased toissue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the Rule 26(3X') of the A.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as well as A.P. Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act and consequently direct the respondents to desist from levying and collecting any amount pursuant to the demand notice N0.752/Q/97 dated 16-9-1998.'The challenge to the validity of Rule 26(3Xii) of A.P. Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 (for short, the 'Rules') should fail in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in S. Venkates...
S.A. Quader Vs. Superintending Engineer, (Operation), City Circle, Aps ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD30
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to quash the orders issued by first respondent in Memo No. SE (O) Estt/C1 478/86, dated 11-6-1986 and by the second respondent in Memo No. CEE/ HZ/P2/Misc./D.No. 108/90, dated 7-5-1990. The first respondent vide Memo dated 11-6-1986 ordered that the petitioner is deemed to have resigned from service with effect from 17-9-1983 and he is no more in the Board Service as he absented himself unauthorisedly for more than one year. On appeal by the petitioner, the second respondent vide Memo dated 7-5-1990 confirmed the said order of the first respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this writ petition.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as LDC in Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board and he applied for leave from 20-5-1983 to 16-9-1983 vide his application dated 18-5-1983, which was sanctioned vide Memo dated 23-9-1983 and the petitioner was informed that he was having 88 d...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »