Andhra Pradesh Court February 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Shaik Khader and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD830; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)830; 2002(1)ALT494; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)179; 2002CriLJ1764
Gopalakrishna Tamada, J. 1. This appeal filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh is against the judgment in Sessions Case No.120 of 1999 on the file of the Court of I Addl. Sessions Judge, Nellore, by which the respondents herein (for convenience, they are referred to as 'accused') who were tried as accused 1 to 3 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 376 read with 511, 376 read with 511 and 114 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and were acquitted. 2. The substance of the charge framed against the accused by the learned Sessions Judge was that(1) on or about 13th day of June 1998 at about 10.30 P.M., and since two months prior thereto at the house of A-1 to A-3, who are inter-related, the 1st accused attempted to have sexual intercourse with Shaik Sharmila Begum, W/o Shaik Shafi and brother of A-1, against her will and consent; (2) A-2 and A-3 who are the parents of the 1st accused and the parents-in-law of the said Shaik Sharmila Begum (hereinafter referred to as 'the decease...
B. Bhaskar, Owner of Lorry Vs. Authorised Officer-cum-sub-divisional F ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALT200; 2002CriLJ1937
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.1. Both the counsel appeared and argued the matter at length and at their request, the matter is disposed of at the admission stage itself.2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the seizure of the lorry bearing Registration No. AEK 2527 belonging to the petitioner, made by the 2nd respondent on 21-11-2001 with 4137 Kgs. of Red-sander logs as illegal and arbitrary and also to declare the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent dt.27-12-2001 in OR No. 162/2001-02 as illegal and void and forbid the respondents from proceeding further in pursuance of the said seizure.3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the lorry bearing Registration No. AEK 2527 and his lorry was engaged in carrying Sugarcane produce raised by agriculturists to M/s. Prudential Mouli Sugars, Pichattoor on hire basis, that he has specifically instructed his driver not to carry contraband articles in his lorry in violation of the A.P. Forest Act, that ...
Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Aleem and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALT433
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The C.M.A. is filed against the Orders passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nizamabad in W.C.No. B/551/92(NF), dated 31-7-1992.2. The claimant, who is an employee, working as driver of lorry bearing No. AP 9 T 1224 was involved in an accident on 26-2-1992. Thereupon, he filed a claim petition before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation claiming compensation under the provisions of the Act. The learned Commissioner found that the loss of earning capacity is cent per cent, accordingly awarded a compensation of Rs. 1,07,640/-. Aggrieved by the said Order, the present appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company.3. The learned Standing Counsel for the Insurance Company submits that certificate produced by the workman only indicates that he had 15 per cent loss of disability and without there being any medical evidence or any other evidence, the Commissioner ought not to have fixed the loss of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›