Andhra Pradesh Court December 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Suresh Singh Vs. Executive Office-cum-person in Management of GraIn ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD477
ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. The petitioner seeks to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records from the Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad in respect of the order dated 21-11-2002 made in O.A. No. 10/2002 and to quash the same.2. The petitioner's father was one of the tenants in respect of the premises bearing No. 7-3-87 to 89 Grain Bazar, Dharmasala, Sajjanlal Street, Secunderabad belonging to the 1st respondent. After the death of the petitioner's father, the petitioner was holding over the premises and running a hotel under the name and style of 'Gokul Bhavan Hotel'. The Executive Officer-cum-Person in Management of Grain Bazar, Dharmasala, Sajjanlal Street, Secunderabad made a complaint before the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments (Twin Cities) (3rd respondent) stating that the petitioner is an encroacher as he has defaulted in payment of rent amount of Rs. 53,517/- from 1-4-1993 to 1-4-1999 in payment of enhanced rents and the said amount has not bee...
Mamidala Ramesh Vs. the State, S.H.O., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)387; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)224
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Venu Madhav, counsel representing Sri Bari, the learned counsel for the petitioner and also Sri M.A. Khadeer, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The facts in brief are as follows:The petitioner/accused in Crime No. 34/2002 of Choppadandi Police Station filed divorce petition O.P. No. 64/2001 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, at Karimnagar against 2nd respondent praying the Court to pass a decree for divorce by dissolving the marriage with the 2nd respondent and the learned Judge passed a decree accordingly on 21-9-2001. It is further stated that the 2nd respondent/defacto-complainant filed a complaint on 19-2-2002 before the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner had married another lady notice 15-2-2002 and the said complaint was forwarded to the Sub-Inspector of Police, Choppadandi and after receiving the complaint, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Choppadandi in Crime No. 34/2002, dated 20-2-...
Ganga Industrial Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Videocon International ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)273; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)150; II(2003)BC342
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Mr. A Sudarshan Reddy and Mrs. Monica Pole, learned Counsel representing the respective parties and also the Addl. Public Prosecutor. 2. In both these criminal petitions, petitioner and respondents are the same. 3. The complainant filed C.C. Nos. 1293 and 1294 of 2000 on the file of XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad against the petitioners herein under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, herein after referred to as 'the Act' for the purpose of convenience. The allegations made in these complaints are to the effect that the cheques given by the petitioners were bounced. It is also stated that the first respondent-complainant had alleged that these cheques were given for the liability of M/s Sujana Corporation and M/s Sujana Corporation is a sister concern of the petitioner company. It is further stated that in the entire complaint, there is no averment regarding the liability and -it is also stated that the petitio...
A. Narayan Rao Vs. Shanta Bai and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD585; 2004(3)ALT104
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Respondents 1 and 2 filed the suit claiming damages of Rs. 5,000/ - from the appellant and Respondents 3 to 7, alleging that on a false report given by the appellant, third respondent (first defendant) who was the then Sub-Inspector of Police, Sirpur, filed criminal cases against the second respondent, who is the son of the first respondent, alleging that he trespassed into the land of appellant, when in fact, that land belongs to the first respondent. Appellant and Respondents 3 and 4 filed a common written statement denying the averments in the plaint and putting 1st respondent to proof of the averments in the plaint. Respondents 5 to 7 remained ex parte. The Trial Court framed four issues for trial. In support of their case, Respondents 1 and 2 examined themselves as PWs. 3 and 1 respectively and two other witnesses PWs.2 and 4 and marked Exs.A1 to A17. On behalf of the appellant and Respondents 3 and 4, third respondent examined himself as DW1 and marked Ex.B1...
Perugu Varalakshmi Vs. State and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: II(2004)DMC610
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In C.C. No. 39 of 1995 on the file of First Additional Munsif Magistrate, Tenali, Perugu Nageswara Babu (A1) and his parents Perugu Narasimha and Perugu Venkayamma (A2 and A3) were tried for offence under Section 498A, IPC. The Trial Court, through its judgment dated 22.9.1997, acquitted the accused. The State filed Criminal Appeal No. 199 of 1998 and the de facto complainant, that is the wife of A1 Perugu Varalakshmi filed Crl. R.C. No. 1224 of 1997 against the judgment of the Trial Court.2. The case of the prosecution was that Perugu Varalakshmi (P.W. 1) as married to A1 in the year 1991 and both of them gave birth to a son P.W. 2. Subsequently, A1, A2 and A3 started harassing the P.W, 1 for bringing money as well as to convey the property at Tenali in favour of A1. P.W. 1 filed a complaint (Ex. P1) alleging that she has been harassed by A1 for bringing more dowry and to convey the property, The complaint was specific with reference to an incident, said to ha...
United Phospherus Ltd. Vs. Sri Saiteja Fertilizers and Pesticides and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)290; III(2003)BC130; [2003]114CompCas587(AP)
L. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner has filed a complaint in C. C. No. 175 of 2002 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise, Guntur, under Section 190 read with Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the respondents herein alleging that they have committed offences punishable under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act'). The trial court, through orders dated October 1, 2002, dismissed the complaint against A-3, respondent No. 3 herein. The petitioner challenges the same.2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor.3. Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that though the cheque was issued by respondent No. 2, the business was being undertaken by respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in partnership and, as such, there was no justification for the trial court in dismissing the complaint against respondent No. 3. He further states that whatever may be the meri...
icds Supervisors and E.Os (Wandcw) Association, Andhra Pradesh, Women ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD569
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. On the face of it, this writ petition is not maintainable in law. In this writ petition filed by the applicant-Association in O.A. No. 9371 of 2002, the following relief is sought:'For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more articularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing impugned G.O. Ms. No. 44, Women Development, Child Welfare and Disabled Welfare (ICDS) Department dated 19.9.2002 insofar as it relates to filling up of more than 1000 posts of Child Development Project Officers, Addl. Child Development Project Officers and Supervisors on contract basis and outsourcing 273 posts of Data Entry operators, as arbitrary and illegal and ultra vires of A.P. (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalization of Staff Pattern and Pay Structure) Act, 1994 and consequently direct the respondents...
G. Lingaswamy Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)1000; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)332; II(2003)DMC253
K.C. Bhanu, J.1. The appeal is directed against the judgment in sessions case No. 1/1996 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar, dated 30.1.1999, convicting the sole accused under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, and in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months. Assailing the conviction and sentence, the accused filed the present appeal, questioning the legality and correctness of the judgment.2. The brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that, the accused was the husband of Rajeshwari, that on 24.3.1994 the Head Constable (HC.280) of II Town Police Station, Mahabubnagar received a medical intimation from the Headquarters Hospital, Mahabubnagar with regard to the admission of Rajeshwari with burn injuries, that the Head Constable visited the hospital and recorded the statement of Rajeshwari wherein she stated that on 24.3.199...
Kothapalli Sunil Kumar Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)472; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)297
K.C. Bhanu, J.1. The appeal is directed against the judgment in Special Sessions Case No. 10/1998 on the file of the Special Judge for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act-cum-Additional District Judge, Adilabad, convicting the accused for an offence under Section 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, 'the S.C. & S.T. Act') read with Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Questioning the legality and correctness of the conviction and sentence recorded by the Court below, the accused filed the present appeal.2. The brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that, on 3.4.1998 at about 3.00 p.m., a sweeper by name Eppa Durgamma went inside the Municipal Office, Kagaznagar, along with another sweeper, P...
Medisetti Ravi Babu and anr. Vs. Pramida Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: II(2003)BC527
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. 1st respondent filed the suit against the revision petitioners and 2nd respondent who are sureties and principal debtor respectively and obtained a money decree against them. Revision petitioners filed an appeal against the decree and sought stay of execution of the decree passed against them. They were directed to deposit half of the decretal amount and costs as a condition precedent for granting stay of execution of the decree passed against them. That order is being questioned in this revision.2. The contention of the learned Counsel for the revision petitioners is that since decree against the 2nd respondent (principal debtor) became final for the reason of his not filing an appeal against decree passed against him. 1st respondent could as well proceed against 2nd respondent and realise the decreetal amount from him, and his not filing an E.P. against the 2nd respondent for realisation of the decretal amount and trying to realise the decretal amount only ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »