Andhra Pradesh Court September 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. G.S.R. Somayaji Vs. State Through Cbi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD(Cri)692; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)456; 2002CriLJ795
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The petitioner assails the order dated 28-6-2001 passed by the learned Special Judge for C.B.I. cases, Hyderabad, in Cri. M.P. No. 148 of 2000 in C.C. No. 17 of 1999.2. The petitioner is the accused in C.C. No. 17 of 1999 filed by the C.B.I. for the alleged offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('the Act, 1988' for brevity).3. The factual matrix germane in the context for better understanding of the matter and for eventual adjudication may be stated thus : The petitioner accused has been working as Regional Chief, Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited, a concern totally owned by the Government of India. Basing on a- complaint dated 27-6-1998 received from one Dr. C. . Suresh against the petitioner, a case in Crime No. 10/ACB-CR/98 had been registered by the Anti Corruption Bureau of the State of Andhra Pradesh and the agency laid a trap against him. The trap was successful and ...
Sri Balaji Park Residents Welfare Association Vs. Vice-chairman, Visak ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD325
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. This writ petition by way of public interest litigation is filed by the President of Sri Balaji Park Residents Welfare Association, Sector-2, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam for a writ or in the nature of a mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent - Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority (VUDA) in dividing the vacant site in an extent of about Ac.0.85 cents in S.No.SP and 26P of Peda Waltair village situate in Sector -2 of MVP Colony, reserved for the community purpose, into small plots and selling the same in public auction as illegal arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents to reserve the said site for the public purpose such as community centre or park and nursery in the interest of the residents of the colony. Facts: 2. The 1st respondent in 1972 acquired land to an extent of 400 acres in the village of Muvvalavani Palem and published a lay out in the year 1978 calling applications from the public for allotment of house sites of var...
Ummul Qura Educational Society and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD250; 2001(5)ALT422
ORDER1. This batch of writ petitions may have to be disposed of by a common order since common questions of law arise for consideration and the subject matter involved requiring adjudication is the same. 2. All the writ petitioners herein claim to be the minority educational institutions. They are aggrieved by the action of the Government of Andhra Pradesh in not issuing the minority status certificates. The decision of the State government not to issue any minority status certificates to the engineering colleges established during the academic year 2001-2002 is impugned in these writ petitions. The inaction on the part of the respondent-government in disposing of the applications filed by the petitioners for grant of minority status certificates to the institutions in question is challenged. 3. Wide ranging submissions as to the nature, scope, width, ambit and content of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India are made by the learned Senior Co...
United India Insurance Company Limited, Nizamabad Vs. Mekala Advaiah a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD447; 2001(6)ALT657; [2002(92)FLR358]
1. This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company against the orders of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Nizamabad, dt.31.10.1997 in W.C. No. 137 of 1997. The facts of the case are as follows:2. The workman, who is the first respondent in this appeal, was working as a driver of the lorry bearing No. ADB 6219 and the second respondent herein is the owner of the said lorry. On 22-5-1996 while the applicant was driving the said lorry during the course of his employment and when it reached the outskirts of Khanapur village, a scooter bearing No. AP-25 5755 came in the opposite direction in a zig zag manner due to which the applicant confused and lost his control over the lorry due to which the lorry went off the road and fell in a ditch and as a result the driver of the lorry sustained grievous head injuries, injuries on his chest, back, waist and fracture of right hand wrist and multiple injuries on various parts of the body, that he was taken to Govt. hospital, Nizamabad where...
Kumar's Mettalurgical Corporation Limited Vs. Asst. Commercial Tax Off ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD245; 2002(1)ALT783
S. Ananda Reddy, J. 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Company praying for the issue of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings dated 6.7.1995 passed by the respondent as without jurisdiction and contrary to G.O.Ms.No. 117, dated 17.3.1993 as well as the judgment of this Court in Srinivasulu Chetty & Sons Co. vs. State of A.P., 75 STC 366 and consequently quash the same. 2. The petitioner, which is a public limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 established its large-scale industry in Nalgonda district tomanufacture Sponge Iron. It is a registered dealer on the files of the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, General Bazaar Circle, Secunderabad. Under the incentive Scheme formulated by the Government, which was amended by G.O.Ms. No.117 of Industries & Commerce Department, dated 17.3.1993, the assessee Company, which was situated in Area No.II is entitled not only for capital subsidy up to 50% of the capital cost not exceeding Rs. 15 lakhs but also en...
Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Gole Vivekananda and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD651
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. These appeals arise out of a judgment dated 31st July, 2001 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in WP Nos. 12768 and 12909 of 2001 whereby and whereunder, following its earlier judgment dated 31-7-2001 in WP No. 14245 of 2001, the learned Judge directed the appellants herein to complete conduct of elections within a period of 90 days from the date of judgment. 2. The judgment of the learned single Judge in the aforementioned writ petition viz., WP No. 14245 of 2001 came up for consideration before this Bench in WA 1248 of 2001. By a judgment dated 20th August 2001, the Bench, while upholding a part of the judgment passed by the learned single Judge, modified the direction as regards the time fixed for holding of election stating: 'The schedule of time required commences from 23-7-2001 and even according to the schedule, by 6-8-2001 the division of MPHS data Assembly-constituency-wise is completed. As noticed in the beginning of the judgment, the learned A...
Renewable Energy Systems Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2000(2)ALD(Cri)596; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)701; [2002]111CompCas786(AP)
T.Ch. Surya Rao, J. 1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved and also as the parties are same all these cases can be disposed of together.2. The petitioners seek to quash the proceedings initiated against them under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on various complaints in CC No. 344/200. CC No. 105/97, CC No. 1059/98, CC No. 1058/98, CC No. 749/97, CC No. 354/97, CC No. 977/97 respectively on the file of the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and the grounds mentioned, inter alia, in the petitions are two-fold. Firstly that there has been no specific allegation against the petitioners 2 and 3, who are obviously not signatories of the cheques issued in favour of the complainant, that, at the time of commission of the offence, they are in charge of conduct of the business of the company and were responsible for the conduct of the administration of the company or that the offence was committed by the company with the c...
Richman Silks Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commr. (Legal), Cus. and C. Ex.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2005(182)ELT318(AP)
Ramesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. Petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to call for the records in C.C. No. 46/1993 filed before the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, and quash the same.2. The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. V. Jogayya Sarma, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr. V. Gopala Krishna, Spl. Public Prosecutor for Customs & Central Excise on behalf of the Respondents. The Court made the following Orders :-3. The petitioners herein were the accused in C.C. No. 46 of 1993 pending on the file of the Special Judge, Economic Offences, Hyderabad. The prosecution was filed on the strength of adjudication made by the Collector, Customs, on 27-1-1992. The said Order was set aside by the appellate authority and was remanded back for passing fresh Orders.4. Under t...
Mekala Sarojinamma Vs. Chief Secretary to Govt. of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALT742
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. This writ petition is taken up as a public interest litigation upon a complaint by the petitioner alleging that the police have killed seven persons branded as naxalites in a fake encounter on 21-3-1997 at Lakshmapur village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak district. The relief prayed in the writ petition is as follows:To issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondents to bring all the dead bodies to the Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad as there are no adequate facilities at Narsapur Government Hospital where presently the dead bodies are kept ready for postmortem and also direct the respondents to take a video photographic pictures of all the dead bodies before and during the post-mortem and direct the respondents to hand over the bodies to the relatives ......... and also direct an independant agency other than the police department to register a crime under Section 302 I.P.C. for...
G. Kesava Rao Vs. Manohar Varu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALT73
ORDERB.S.A. Swamy, J.1. The question that falls for consideration in this revision petition is whether the concurrent findings recorded by the learned IV Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad in R.C.No. 226 of 1990 and the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad in R.A.No. 288 of 1993 are perverse and not based upon the evidence available on record and if so whether this Court, in exercise of its revisional power under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short 'the Act') can interfere with their orders.2. The factual background of this case is that the petitioner-landlord originally hails from Thakkellapadu village in Krishna District. On appointment as a Teacher, came to Khammam District and he retired from service in the year 1977. During his service, he not only constructed a house at Khammam but also purchased the suit schedule building at Hyderabad. As he was residing at Khammam due to his employment, he let ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »