Andhra Pradesh Court August 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Visakha Industries Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2001
Reported in: [2001]251ITR471(AP)
S. Ananda Reddy, J.1. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad, in iTA No. 1173 of 1995, dated August 2, 2000, for the assessment year 1992-93. 2. The brief facts leading to the filing of this appeal are :3. The assessee, a limited company, filed ifs return of income disclosing 'nil income'. In the statement of computation the assessee recorded income from the asbestos cement division at Rs. 1,38,21,748 and loss from its spinning division at Rs. 89,90,222. The net total income of the two divisions was reflected at Rs. 48,31,526. The assessee has, however, claimed deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), on the net income from its asbestos division amounting to Rs. 27,04,350 and Rs. 34,55,437, respectively. Thus, the total deduction claimed amounts to Rs. 62,19,787. The assessee thereafter r...
The Management of Nisiet, Rep., by Its Prl. Director Vs. Nisiet Employ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALT773
ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. The sole question that arises for consideration in the instant writ petition is whether the claim of interest of the first respondent-Union under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (herein after called as 'the Act') is maintainable or not.2. The petitioner-Management is a society under the Administrative Control of the Ministry of Industry, the Department of Small Scale Industries, Agro and Rural Industries. The first respondent-Union on behalf of its members, raised an industrial dispute in ID No.13/86 for restoration of the scheme of payment of conveyance allowance, which after being in vogue for some time was discontinued as per the directions of the Government of India. As the Labour Court's award dt. 13-11-1986 was in favour of the first respondent-Union, the petitioner-Management filed WP No.6743/87 before this court unsuccessfully and the WA No.336/92 preferred by it ended in dismissal. In compliance with the award passed by the Labour...
Deendar Anjuman Represented by Its Secretary, Syed Siddique HussaIn Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD(Cri)373; 2001(4)ALT674; 2002CriLJ710
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition is Deendar Anjuman represented by its Secretary, Syed Siddique Hussain. The notification issued by the Government of India under proviso to section 3(3) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (for short 'the Act') vide Notification S.O.No.373 (E), Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary on 28-4-2001 is impugned in this writ petition. By the said notification the Government of India declared the petitioner association/organisation as an unlawful association with immediate effect. By the very said notification, the Central Government, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Act, declared the petitioner association to be an unlawful association. The challenge in the present writ petition has been confined to the exercise of the power by the Central Government under the proviso to sub-section (3) of Section 3. The controve...
Egalapati Sarojanamma Vs. State of A.P. Rep., by the Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD(Cri)486; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)306; I(2002)DMC455
V. Eswaraiah, J.1. The appellant filed this Criminal Appeal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 5/02/1996 made in S.C.No.856/1994 in convicting her under Section 498-A IPC and sentencing her to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for six months.2. The appellant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The deceased married the son (PW-1) of the appellant five months prior to the date of her death i.e., 29/12/1993 in Komarapudi, Sattenapally Mandal, Guntur District. They belonged to Christian Community. At the time of the marriage, the parents of the deceased gave Rs.3,000/- as dowry. After the marriage the deceased joined with her husband (PW-1) and started living with the accused in H.No.432, K.V.P. Colony, Guntur. It is alleged that the accused was having some illicit intimacy with some one, which was noticed by the deceased and the deceased informed the same to ...
Mohd. Abdul Subhan Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD(Cri)507; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)297
ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. The petitioner seeks to cancel the order of bail granted to the accused by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy in P.R.C. No.1 of 1999 while committing the case to the Court of Session on 21.06.1999.2. Briefly stated the facts are thus: The petitioner is the de facto complainant who filed a private complaint against the respondents 3 to 7 herein who are the Excise Officials alleging that they murdered his son late Mohammed Noorullah, who had been working as Junior Assistant in the Excise Department. A crime was registered earlier against respondents 3 to 7 in Crime No. 123 of 1996 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code on 06.05.1996 by the Town Police Station, Sangareddy. Later, investigation in the case was taken up by the C.B.C.I.D, and eventually it submitted a final report dated 22.08.1997 recommending for dropping the proceedings against the accused. Having been aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed a private complaint against th...
Vanamala Amaranadh Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Through the Public ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD(Cri)405; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)244; 2001CriLJ4498; II(2001)DMC676
ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. The sole accused filed this appeal against the Judgment in S.C. No. 137 of 1993, dt.16.6.1995 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Warangal convicting him for the offences under sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for two years for the offence punishable under section 498A I.P.C. and to suffer R.I. for 7 years for the offence punishable under section 306 I.P.C.2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant, a resident of Govardhangiri village of Raghunathapally Mandal, Warangal district married the deceased viz., Vanamala Bhagya Lakshmi, a resident of Shivunipally village of the same Mandal and the distance between the village of the accused and his in-laws village is about 4 kilometres. At the time of marriage, the father of the deceased paid an amount of Rs.6,000/- as dowry to the accused in addition to other articles as per their custom. After one year of the marriage, the marriage was consummated and the dec...
Khaja MoenuddIn Vs. A.P. State Electricity Board and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)ALT89
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. The controversy raised in this writ petition rests on a narrow compass namely as to whether the petitioner who is tenant of the premises at Lothkunta, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, after disconnection of the power supply, without applying for fresh connection for power supply, can demand for continuation of the supply existing in the name of the registered consumer.2. The petitioner claims to be tenant in respect of the shop bearing Nos. 14-17 to 14-19 of Lothkunta, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. It is averred that the petitioner obtained the said premises on lease for a period of three years and that some differences have arisen between the tenant and the landlord with regard to enhancement of rent and consequently the petitioner moved the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, East and North, Ranga Reddy District in O.S.No. 518 of 1997 and obtained interim injunction against the landlord. Counterblast to his suit, the landlord also filed anot...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›