Andhra Pradesh Court April 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Leaap Forwarders (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Custo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD216; 2001(3)ALT131; 2001(135)ELT58(AP)
ORDERS.R Nayak, J 1. This writ petition is directo), against the Public Notice No.9/2001 Customs dated 3-2-2001 issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Guntur (the Commissioner, for brevity), the first respondent herein. 2. The petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Company's Act, 1956, in the year 1989 and having its registered office at Plot No.1497, J-Block, 16th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. According to the petitioner, it is involved in the business of clearing and forwarding the goods, which arrive at various ports and also those, which are meant for export to other countries.3. The petitioner-Company has been granted licence to act as Custom House Agent (CHA, for brevity) by the Commissioner vide CHA Licence No.5/91 (Regular) which has since been renewed vide C.No.VIII/13/5/99-Cus. Tech., dated 15-11-1999 and valid upto 25-11-2004. As per the licence issued, the licensee is authorised to transact business as Customs House Agent at ICD Reddipal...
Fci Employees Union and Another Vs. Fertilizer Corporation of India Li ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD570; 2001(3)ALT75
ORDER'Victories are gained, peace is preserved, progress is achieved, civilization is built up and history is made not on the battlefields where ghastly murders are committed in the name of patriotism, not in the Council Chambers where insipid speeches are spun out in the name of debate, not even in factories where are manufactured novel instruments to strangle life, but in educational institutions which are the seed-beds of culture, where children in whose hands quiver the destinies of the future, are trained. From their ranks will come out when they grow up, statesmen and soldiers, patriots and philosophers, who will determine the progress of the land'. (See: Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of A.P., : [1993]1SCR594 ); --Sharma, CJI. 1. The petitioners in the instant writ petition challenged the action of the first respondent-Management in proposing to close the school Kendriya Vidyalaya from the academic year 2001-2002. The proceedings in letter No.CEO/4-1/KV (EDN)/2001, dated 15-1-2001...
Aravapalli Sriranganayakulu Vs. Godavarthi Leelavathi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD516; 2001(4)ALT32
ORDER1. The revision petitioner, who is the second defendant in the suit, assailsthe order dated 2-2-2001 passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chirala, in IA No.48 of 2001 in OS No.298 of 1998.2. The petitioner filed an application under Order 13, Rule 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure requesting the Court to receive the documents, list of which along with the documents appended thereto. The list of documents contains apart from various original documents, the other documents namely photostat copies and carbon copies of certain other documents. That application was resisted by the adversary by filing a counter. The Court below having been satisfied with the sufficient cause for not filing those documents earlier at the relevant time directed the documents to be received under the impugned order. However, while passing that order it restricted the order only to receive the original documents by rejecting specifically the other documents namely the pho...
Hyder Ali Khan Vs. Registrar of Companies, Hyd. and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD678; 2001(4)ALT706
ORDER1. The petitioner by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus setting aside the election of respondents 2, 3, 5, 6 as Members-Stewards and R8 as Chairman to the Hyderabad Race Club at its 29th Annual General Body Meeting held on 27-9-2000 by declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary and void.2. It is stated by the petitioner that Hyderabad Race Club, Hyderabad (for short 'the Club') is incorporated as a Company under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') as per certificate of Incorporation No.1403 of 1971-72 issued by the first respondent. For the election of four Stewards at 29th Annual General Meeting of the HRC, the 7th respondent-Secretary of the Club issued a notice under Section 257(1-A) of the Act to the effect that six nominations have been received by enclosing the procedure indicated for the conduct of the said election as per Article 26 of the Arti...
Dharwada Madhava Rao and Another Vs. District and Sessions Judge, E.G. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALD47
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. The grievance ofthe petitioners, to put in a nut shell, is this: The District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari District filled up several posts in the cadre of LDC during the period from 1-10-1979 to 9-3-1983 without maintaining 3:1 ratio stipulated in Rule 9(2) of the A.P. Judicial Ministerial Service Rules (the Rules, for brevity) and in the process many of them who ought to have been juniors to the petitioners in the cadre of LDC have become seniors to them.2. This case has a chequered career in terms of litigative processes. We do notthink it necessary to refer to the entire history of the case. Suffice it to state that the petitioners filed WP No.5142 of 1989 in this Court seeking a direction to the learned District Judge to refix their seniority by maintaining 3:1 ratio as stipulated in Rule 9(2) of the Rules with effect from the date of passing of Group II examination on18-1-1981 and consequential benefits of promotion etc. That writ petition was disposed ...
Agarapu Nirmala Vs. Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALT520
1. All these second appeals are filed by the plaintiffs aggrieved by a common judgment and decree dated 15-6-1998 of the I Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam made in a batch of appeals.2. All the appellants herein are taxpayers of Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation. They have filed the suits in OS No.336 of 1991 and batch questioning the revision of assessment and enhancement of tax in respect of their houses. Ail the suits have been tried together, and the Principal District Munsif, Visakhapatnam dismissed the same on 22-8-1996. The plaintiffs filed appeals before the I Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam and the lower appellate Court also dismissed all the appeals by judgment and decree dated 15-6-1998. The plaintiffs are thus before this Court questioning the aforesaid concurrent judgments in dismissing their suits.3. Sri N. V. Ranganadham, the learned senior Counsel appearing for all the appellants submits that the averments in the plaint are common and the questions in...
Kakatiya Picture, 35 MM, Warangal Vs. Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal-cum- ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD631; 2001(3)ALT584; [2001(90)FLR1116]; (2001)2LLJ1040AP
ORDERS.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. 'There is no surer way to misread a document than to read it literally', said Justice Frankfurter inMassachusetta B. and Ins. Company v. United States, (1956) 352 US 128 = 1 L Ed. 189.2. Aforementioned dicta, as would appear from the discussions made hereinafter squarely apply to the facts of these cases.3. The parties herein were fighting a lis before the 1st respondent herein in ID No.383 of 1988.In the said proceedings, a joint memo dated 25-9-1990 was filed requesting the Labour Court to pass an award in terms of the compromise which is in the following terms:'The petitioners and the opposite party jointly filed this memo for consideration of the Tribunal. 1. Both the parties agreed for thirty per cent increase in the existing wages as on the date of the raising of this Industrial dispute. 2. It is agreed that each employee who works for morning show shall be paid one hour's time wage if he completes duty of other shows (three). 3. It is further agreed to m...
Narravula Kotam Raju Vs. Regional Deputy Director of Fisheries, Kakina ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD649; 2001(5)ALT245
ORDERS.B. Sinha, CJ 1. This writ petition is directed against a judgment dated 7-10-1999 in OA No.4213 of 1998 passed by A.P. Administrative Tribunal whereby and whereunder the original application filed by the petitioner herein questioning an order of the 3rd respondent as contained in memo dated 21-4-1998 whereby and whereunder inter se seniority between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents 4 to 9 was determined, had been dismissed.2. The petitioner joined as record assistant on 11-7-1979. His Services were regularised subsequently. He was promoted as junior assistant in 1982 and as senior assistant in 1992. On or about 22-7-1997 the 7th respondent before the Tribunal submitted a representation to the effect that he had been assigned seniority at S.No.27 of the revised seniority list of Junior Assistants wherein the applicant was shown at S.No.20 and another person by name Sardhar Khan - applicant in OA No.4462 of 1998 was shown at S.No.22 although he was not qualified there...
P. Sambasiva Rao and Others Vs. Registrar (Admn.) High Court of A.P., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD694; 2001(4)ALT272
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. The petitioners who are nine in number and who are serving inthe establishment of A.P., High Court eitheras Copyists or typists have filed this writ petition for the following relief:'For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent to implement the orders passed by the then Hon'ble Chief Justice in the month of July, 1979 fixing the ratio of 2:1:1:1 between Assistants, Examiners, Typists and Copyists in the place of 4:1 ratio between Assistants/ Examiners and Typists/Copyists, on the representation dated 20-4-1979 submitted by the Copyists for the period from July, 1979 to 28-4-1997 (i.e., the date of notification fixing the ratio of 2:1 in the place of 4:1 between Assistants/ Examiners and Typists/Copyists) with all consequential benefits and pass such order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.'2. Although vo...
K. Venkateswar Rao Vs. Secretary to Government Health Medical and Fami ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALD139
ORDERS.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. This writ petition is directed against a judgment and order dated 27-10-1999 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No.656 of 1999 dated 27-10-1999 whereby and whereunder the original application filed by the respondent No.5 herein questioning the order in G.O. Rt. No. 1097, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (Q.1) Department, dated 30-7-1997 and the consequential order dated 5-1-1999 of the Director of Insurance, Medical Service cancelling the selection grade granted in his favour on 1-1-1975, was allowed.2. The petitioner was appointed temporarily as Typist in the Directorate of Health Services on 8-2-1966 and he having been selected by the A.P Public Service Commission, was regularly appointed as Typist in the year 1967. His services as Typist were regularised with effect from 7-6-1968. He was converted as LDC with effect from 1-10-1971. Respondent No.5 was appointed as LDC on 1-11-1968 and his services as such were regularised with effec...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »