Andhra Pradesh Court December 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.V.R. Bhaskar Rao Vs. Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD21; 2002(3)ALT101
Motilal B. Naik, J. 1. Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to order made in OA (SR) No. 8335 of 1996 dated 19-6-1997 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad; and the records in judgment of the Lokayukta in CMP No. 2 of 1990 dated 19-7-1990 and seek a further direction to the Lokayukta to drop all proceedings in respect of complaint Nos. 1864 and 2020 of 1988 and to pass such other order or orders in the circumstances of the case. 2. Petitioner after obtaining MBBS degree in the year 1958 joined A.P. Medical Services in the year 1960. In the year 1965, he obtained Post-Graduation Degree in MS (General Surgery) and was promoted as Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery in October, 1971. In December, 1974 he went to U.K. for training in open heart surgery and returned to Andhra Pradesh State Medical Services in June, 1978. Thereafter, upto 1985, he worked in various Government Hospitals in Hyderabad. 3. According to the petitioner, in the month of No...
Shaik Ghouse MohiuddIn Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD751
ORDER1. In this revision petition, the orders dated 19-11-2001 made by the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Tribunal, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in Appeal No. 6 of 1998 is challenged on various grounds.2. The petitioner is the son of the late Abdul Gaffoor, who worked as Muthawalli of the Dargah Hazrath Baji Shaheed (hereinafter referred to as 'the Dargah'). The petitioner approached the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Wakf Board') to notify and recognize him as Muthawalli of the Dargah under Section 29 of the Wakf Act, 1954 corresponding to Section 42 of the Wakf Act, 1995 as per the direction of this Court in WP No. 2248 of 1997.3. Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court while disposing of WP No. 2248 of 1997, an enquiry was held by appointing an Enquiry Officer Sri Khader Mohiuddin and thereafter it was resolved in the meeting of the Wakf Board to accept the finding of the Enquiry Officer to appoint the petitioner as Muthawalli of the ...
M. Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. Stiles India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD185
S.R. Nayak, J.1. O.S.A.NO. 5 of 1998 is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge dated 12.8.1997 passed in C.P. No. 71 of 1996 dismissing the company petition filed by the appellant.2. M/s. Stiles India Limited, the respondent herein, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, the Act), having its registered office at Hyderabad and it is carrying on business activities at Lakshminagaram, Konangivaripalli, Tirupati-Chittoor Highway. Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. The authorized capital of the respondent-company is Rs. 9 crores divided into 90 lakh equity shares of Rs. 10/- each. The main object of the respondent- company is to carry on business of manufacture and dealing in Ceramic and Stoneware tiles. Mr. M. Suryanarayana, the appellant herein, and the petitioner in C.P. No. 71 of 1996, had worked as General Manager (Finance) in the respondent-company till the end of December, 1994 and left the company with effect from ...
Atluri Usha Swamy Vs. Vijay Prestessed Products (P) Limited and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD843; 2002(5)ALT68
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal by the unsuccessful plaintiff in OS No. 1021 of 1987 on the file of the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad.2. The appellant filed the suit against the respondents for recovery of a sum of Rs. 3,47,850/- together with interest. It was pleaded by the appellant that herself, the 2nd respondent, the wife of the 3rd respondent and another constituted a partnership firm on 21-6-1982 to carry on the business of manufacture and sale of cement concrete sleepers and poles and other products. The 1st respondent, which is a private limited company, took over the assets and liabilities of the partnership firm referred to above. The 2nd respondent acted as the Managing Director of the 1st respondent-Company. Acting on behalf of the 1st respondent, the 2nd respondent executed a promissory note in favour of the appellant undertaking to pay an amount of Rs. 2,25,000/- with interest at 18% per annum. The 3rd respondent figured as a witness to th...
Adusumalli Siva Narasimha Rao Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Its Autho ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)ALT525
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J. 1. This is an unfortunate case where an agriculturist has been made to file as many as four appeals, not to speak of equivalent number of proceedings before the Land Reforms Tribunal. Still the matter stands where it was earlier. 2. The petitioner filed a declaration under Section 8 of The A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973. The Land Reforms Tribunal (LRT) through its order dated 23-3-1978 held that the petitioner has 0.6589 standard holding of land in excess of ceiling limit. He filed LRA No.67 of 1978 before Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal (LRAT). The LRAT through its order dated 21-10-1978 took a view that the excess holding of the petitioner is 0.3374 and the same was confirmed in C.R.P.No.214 of 1978 by this Court through order dated 20-7-1979. 3. Thereafter, the LRT initiated proceedings for surrender. The petitioner offered to surrender Ac.11-81 cents equivalent to 0.3374 standard holding in certain survey numbers. The LRT ...
Managing Committee Vs. T. Sesha Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2003(4)ALT383
G. Bikshapathy, J.1. All the three appeals can be disposed of by a common judgment as they arise of out of a common judgment in O.S. Nos. 556 of 1983, 604 of 1983 and 17 of 1986 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. One Mr. T. Sesha Reddy, represented by his G.P.A. Mr. K.P. Reddaiah, is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 556 of 1983 who filed the said suit for declaration of his title in the plaint schedule property and for a consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the said property and in the alternative for declaration of title and for possession of the suit property and for costs. The first defendant is the Managing Committee of Jame Masjid and the 2nd defendant is the A.P. Wakf Board represented by its Secretary. Originally the suit was numbered as O.S. No. 470 of 1982 and on its transfer it was renumbered as O.S. No. 556 of 1983. 3. O.S. No. 604 o...
Mr. M. Suryanarayana Vs. Stiles India Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Di ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: [2003]116CompCas448(AP)
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. O.S.A. No. 5 of 1998 is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge dated 12.8.1997 passed in C.P. No. 71 of 1996 dismissing the company petition filed by the appellant. M/s Stiles India Limited, the respondent herein, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, the Act), having its registered office at Hyderabad and it is carrying on business activities at Lakshminagaram, Konangivaripalli, Tirupati-Chittoor Highway, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. The authorized capital of the respondent-company is Rs. 9 crores divided into 90 lakh equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The main object of the respondent-company is to carry on business of manufacture and dealing in Ceramic and Stoneware tiles. Mr. M. Suryanarayana, the appellant herein, and the petitioner in C.P. No. 71 of 1996, had worked as General Manager (Finance) in the respondent-company till the end of December 1994 and left the company with effect from ...
Kasi Subbaiah Mudali Vs. Kasi Veeraswamy Mudali and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)ALT240
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The judgment-debtor in E.P.No. 44/99 is the petitioner in this revision.2. The petitioner filed O.S.No. 25 of 1991 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi, for recovery of certain amount from the respondent. The suit was dismissed with costs on 19-11-1996 and it became final. The respondent filed E.P.No. 44/99 under Order 21 Rule 11-A for arrest of the petitioner herein on the ground that though he possessed sufficient means, he did not deposit the costs awarded in the decree. The executing court ordered the arrest of the petitioner by order dated 31-1-2000. The petitioner challenges the same in this revision.3. Sri C.V. Nagarguna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under revision is passed in utter disregard of the provisions of the Order 21 Rules 37 and 40 and Section 55 of the C.P.C. and the same cannot be sustained in law. He submits that the executing court, having issued a notice under Order 21 Rule 37 (1), h...
Rupakula Saradamba Vs. Datla Punna Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALT195
ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. The appellant herein was the defendant and the respondent herein was the plaintiff, who had instituted O.S.No. 140 of 1990 in the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali for specific performance of the contract of sale. On evidence, the suit was decreed. Aggrieved by the said decree and judgment, the defendant-appellant herein carried the matter in appeal by filling A.S.No. 296 of 1997 before the III Additional District Judge, Guntur. The appeal filed by the defendant-appellant herein was dismissed. Hence the Second Appeal.2. It is clear from the judgments of both the Courts below that the defendant-appellant herein was the absolute owner of the land. He agreed to sell the land to the plaintiff when Section 4-A notification was issued by the Government for acquisition of the land. The main covenant in the agreement was that if the Government does not acquire the land, the defendant-appellant herein would execute the sale deed in favour of the p...
R.L. Prasad and ors. Vs. Managing Director, A.P. Scheduled Caste Servi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(5)ALT8
ORDERI. Venkatanarayana, J.1. The petitioners are all the employees of the A.P. Scheduled Caste Service Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad, which is a statutory Corporation constituted by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in the year 1974 with avowed object of evolving certain economical developmental schemes by the funds allocated by the Central and State Governments and to implement the said schemes for up-liftment of the Scheduled castes beneficiaries in the State through the District Societies. The said Corporation has been registered under the provisions of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act. The District Collector is the Chairman of the said Society at the District level. The petitioners who are all the employees of the Corporation were constrained to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay their salaries from August, 2000 till today. The petitioners are all appointed du...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »