Andhra Pradesh Court January 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Selvaraj Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD511; 2001(1)ALT634; (2001)ILLJ1232AP
ORDERS.B. Sinha, CJ.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 24-11-2000 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in WP No.10326 of 2000 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed holding:'Apart from the merits of the case, the first respondent took a stand that the entire cause of action, if any, for the petitioner arose in the State of Tamil Nadu, the first respondent of whom the petitioner is an employee, passed the order of termination dated 8-6-2000 at Chennai within the jurisdiction of Tamil Nadu High Court, all the proceedings which form the basis of the termination order took place in the State of Tamil Nadu and therefore no part of the cause of action arose in the territory over this Court for exercising its jurisdiction though the termination order effects within the territory over this Court forexercising its jurisdiction. Subsequently the cause of action arose in the territory of Tamil Nadu.Apart from the o...
T. Bhramaramba Vs. District Educational Officer, Krishna District at M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD560; 2001(1)ALT655
ORDERS.B. Sinha, CJ.1. The petitioner, who is the widow of a school teacher -T. Satyanarayana, has sent a letter to the Chief Justice stating that her husband had put in about 18 years of service and therefore G.O. Ms. No.340, Finance and Planning (F.W. Pen.1) Department, dated 13th December, 1982, be directed to be made applicable to her, whereby the Government, on compassionate grounds, directed grant of financial assistance of Rs.100/- with effect from 1-4-1981, inter alia, to the following: '(a)(i) Widows of teachers of aided and local bodies schools indicated in G.O. Ms. No.3372, Education, dated 31-10-1961 who died prior to 1-4-1961 while in service, provided their husbands had put in not less than 25 years of service in the concerned aided or local bodies' school'.The grievance of the petitioner is that the benefits of the said G.O. have not been extended to her. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner does not fall in the aforementioned category. She, in her petition, merely stated that ...
Agamaiah Vs. Director, Nrsa, Balanagar, Hyderabad and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD535; 2001(1)ALT630
ORDERS.B. SINHA, CJ.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment dated 29-11-2000 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.6922 of 1994 in terms whereof the appellant's writ petition was dismissed. 2. The factal matrix of the matter lies in a narrow compass. The appellant was appointed as a Helper on 16-4-1990. He was later on converted into a daily wage worker from 16-4-1992 up to 31-3-1994. He was thereafter engaged on contract basis up to September, 1995, but he was orally instructed not to attend duty from April, 1994. 3. The writ petition was filed by the appellant herein inter alia praying for issuance of a writ mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in preventing the appellant to attend his legitimate duties as unjust, improper and violative of the provisions of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India since his juniors are being continued in service and for a further declaration that he is entitled for regularisation in the cadre of t...
Principal Secretary to Govt., Agriculture and Co-op. Dept., Govt. of A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD85; 2001(1)ALT676
ORDER1. Having heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners, we are of the opinion that no case is made out for interference with the impugned order passed by the learned Tribunal.2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners relies upon a decision of the Apex Court reported in R. Meshwar Manjhi v. Management of Sangaramgarh Colliery, : (1994)ILLJ376SC and submitted that the order passed by the Tribunal is contrary to the law laid down bythe Apex Court. The factual matrix in the case before the Supreme Court is entirely different from the facts of the instant case. In that case the concerned workman was already inflicted with a punishment and an industrial dispute was raised by him.3. When the matter was pending adjudication before an Industrial Tribunal, the concerned workman died. Thus, the question that had arisen before the Supreme Court was whether the industrial adjudication could be proceeded with further by substituting the legal repres...
P.N. Reddy Vs. Managing Director, Apsrtc, Hyd. and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD94
ORDER1. Heard both sides. The writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission with the consent of both parties.2. The petitioner, aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in paying him salary by computing the notional increments of his past service, seeks an appropriate direction to the respondents in this behalf.3. The petitioner was first appointed as Conductor of the respondent-Corporation in April, 1977 and posted to work atKhammam. Subsequently he was transferred to Kothagudem Depot. While working as a Conductor, on 18-6-1982 the bus in which he was serving, was subjected to a check and on alleged irregularities a departmental enquiry was initialed. A charge-sheet was issued on 26-6-1982 and after due process of inquiry the petitioner was visited with the penalty of removal from service, on 21-10-1982. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute ID No.207 of 1986 before the Labour Court, Warangal. ID No.207 of 1986 was disposed of ...
Mahesh Chandra Sharma Vs. Commandant, Cisf Unit, 6-t, Visakhapatnam, A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-13-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALD284; [2001(91)FLR402]
1. This writ petition was filed seeking a writ of certiorari, call for the records and set aside the order of removal from service passed by the respondents 1 and 2 in their proceedings, dated 18-5-1983 and dismissal of appeal and revision by the appellate authorities confirming the order of removal from service as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with full back-wages and other service benefits, to which the petitioner is entitled to and pass such other orders which are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.2. The petitioner was appointed was a Security Guard by the second respondent and he joined duty on 10-6-1976 and worked in the office of the second respondent till the end of May, 1980 and thereafter he was transferred to the office of the first respondent-Commandant CISF, 6-T, Visakhapatnam in the month of June, 1980. Prior to the transfer to Visakhapatnam, the petitioner worked as constable in the office of the Superinte...
Union of India and Others Vs. S. Gangayya and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2001
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD419; 2001(1)ALT433
ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in OA No.684 of 1997 dated 10-3-1999. 2. Respondent No.1 who worked as Senior DPO, South Eastern Railway, Waltair retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30-6-1996. The second writ petitioner by his proceedings No.DCPO/G/CON/SG/ 96/MJR/759, dated 22-4-1996 issued a Memorandum of charge-memo proposing to hold enquiry against him under Rule 9 of the Railway Servants (Discipline andAppeal) Rules, 1968 by enclosing articles of charge-sheet in annexurre I and II. The respondent No.1 challenged the same before the Central Adminstrative Tribunal stating that there is inordinate delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings and after retirement if any disciplinary proceedings are sought to be initiated, the same can be done only with the prior approval and sanction of the President; that the misconduct alleged against him relates back to the year 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›