Andhra Pradesh Court September 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yeddanapalli Aurna Kumari Vs. Chief Post Master-general, A.P. Circle, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD700; 2000(5)ALT593
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J. 1. Thiswrit petition is filed seeking to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and call for records relating to and connected with OANo.968 of 1999 dated 15-9-1999 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and quash the same.2. It is the case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent herein filed OA No.968 of 1999 challenging the orders passed by the 2nd respondent dated 22-6-1999 appointing the petitioner as the Extra Departmental Branch Post Master, Katrapadu, Guntur Postal Division. It is further stated that in pursuance of the notification dated 7-1-1999 issued by the 2nd respondent the petitioner and the 3rd respondent along with some others applied for the post of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master. The verification was taken upon on 19-4-1999.3. Number of applications found suitable for consideration was 11, whichincludes the petitioner and the 3rd respondent also.4. Considerin...
Hilltop Service Station, an Indian Oil Corporation Retail Outlet, Bang ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD740; 2000(5)ALT790
ORDER1. A retail outlet dealer of Indian Oil Corporation, situate in the junction of Road No.1 and Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, was constrained to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the over-night demolition of a running petrol pump service station by the Municipal Corporation authorities without following the due process of law.2. The factual matrix leading to the filing of the present writ petition is set out as hereunder:- The petitioner is a dealer of the Indian Oil Corporation and has been operating petrol and diesel outlet situate at the junction of Road No. 1 and Road No. 10 of Banjara Hills, Hyderabad since the inception of his dealership. The Indian Oil Corporation, the 8th respondent herein, took the site admeasuring 980 Square Yards situate in Survey Nos.266/2/1 and 266/2/2 under a registered lease deed dated 12-7-1973. The period of the lease was for 20 years from 1-10-1973 and it contained a term that the lease stands renewed on the expiry...
T. Hari Kumar Naidu Vs. Prameela
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD97; 2000(6)ALT79; I(2001)DMC189
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J. 1. Theappellant and the respondent are the husband and wife. The marriage between them was held on 10-3-1989 according to the Hindu rites and customs and they lived together as husband and wife at their permanent residence at Bansilalpet, Secunderabad. During the wedlock they begot two children namely Vikram and another child who were aged about 2 1/2 years and 4 months respectively at the time of filing of the above OP. It is alleged by the appellant thatthe respondent-wife, who was suffering from mental disorder and attempted to commit suicide, and has not shown any interest though he made all endeavours to lead the happy married life. Her acts and behaviour, it is stated, are dangerous both to the appellant and the children and there is no safety as the respondent is suffering from Schizophrenia.2. The appellant-husband, therefore, filed OP No.75 of 1991 before the 111 Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad at Secunderabad under Section 13(1)(iii) of ...
Mc. Dowell and Co., Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD199; 2000(6)ALT369
1. The matter arises under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 2. All the writ petitions can be disposed of by a common Order. In WP No.23773 of 1998, a challenge was made to the process of taking over possession of the urban land by the respondents without passing final Orders under Section 20(2) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 while WPNo.33741 of 1998 was filed challenging the notification issued by the Government in G.O. Ms. No.630 dated 26-7-1997 withdrawing the exemption already granted and for consequential declaration that the notices issued under Section 10 Urban land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 is illegal and without jurisdiction. WP No.9481 of 1999 was filedseeking declaration that the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 are not applicable to the excess land held by the petitioner Company in view of repealing Act 5 of 1999 which entered the force with effect from 11-1-1999.3. The decision in WP ...
B. Gopalamma and Another Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD93; 2000(6)ALT388
ORDER1. The petitioners, who are two in number, working as Record Assistants with SSB Girls High School (hereinafter referred to as 'the School') since 1-9-1984 have filed this writ petition questioning the orders passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting their cases for admission into grant-in-aid posts, which were sanctioned in G.O. Ms. No.398, Education (PS.2) Department, dated 31-10-1994, as illegal and arbitrary.2. The facts are not in dispute. On a representation made by the 4th respondent-Correspondent of the School to the 3rd respondent, the then District Educational Officer vide proceedings Rc.No. 1/SPI/A3/ 87, dated 4-11-1987 sanctioned three unaided posts of Record Assistants from the years 1984 to 1985 along with other teaching and non-teaching posts. Thereafter, the Correspondent of the School appointed the petitioners along with one Mr. K. Subbarayudu on 1-9-1984 as Record Assistants. Subsequently, the 3rd respondent approved the appointments of the petitioners vide his proc...
Y. Sivarama Sastri and Another Vs. Nayeem Khan and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: I(2001)ACC379; 2002ACJ324; 2000(6)ALD374; 2000(6)ALT116
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J.1. This appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarding a sum of Rs.3,85,000/- towards compensation jointly and severally and limiting the liability of the third respondent/ insurance company to Rs.1,50,000/-. The appellants herein are the claimants i.e., father and daughter of the deceased Y. Ramakrishna who met with an unfortunate accident on 7-8-1989 at 8.10 a.m. and died. The respondents filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-stating that the deceased had a brilliant educational career who was a Research Officer working in the National Institute of Nutrition at Hyderabad and submitted that the deceased was aged 30 years old only on the date of accident and that in the normal course he would have risen to the post of Director of the National Nutrition Institute. The brief facts of the case are as follows:That on 7-8-1989 the deceased wasproceeding on his mo...
K. Susheela Vs. Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Boggulakunta, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD544; 2000(5)ALT366
ORDER1. The petitioner is the instant writ petition impugns the proceedings on the file of the Regional Joint Commissioner of Endowments, Multi Zone-Ill, Hyderabad directing the petitioner herein to show-cause as to why the legality, the propriety of the order passed by the Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, T.C., Hyderabad declaring the petitioner herein as member of the founder family of Sri Kanaka Durga Temple, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, should not be examined. The petitioner herein was called upon to be present together with connected records and documents in connection with the proposed enquiry to be held on 28-12-1999 by the Regional Joint Commissioner. 2. It is stated that the petitioner's husband was the devotee of Sri Kanaka Durga Devi. It is stated that with his own funds, the temple in question has been constructed by his individual efforts. It is however, stated that the temple has become public in character for the reason that the public have been allowed to have access ...
North East Securities Limited, Hyd. Vs. Sri Nageswara Chemicals and Dr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD746; 2000(5)ALT413
ORDER1. This is an application filed under Section 11(3), (4) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the New Act') read with Para 2 of the Scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators framed by the Chief Justice of this Court under sub-section (10) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996, to appoint an Arbitrator on behalf of the respondents or in the alternative a soleArbitrator to resolve the dispute that arose between the applicant and the respondents.2. The facts (as stated in the application) leading to the filing of this application, in brief, are the following :The appellant is Non-Banking Financial Company. The 1st respondent herein is a Private Limited Company and the 2nd respondent is its Managing Director. The respondents approached the applicant for providing finance for purchase of a coal-fired boiler worth about Rs.30.00 lakhs. The applicant agreed to do so. The parties then executed a lease agreement on 11-3-1996. That agreem...
Neelam Enterprises Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. (A.P. Tra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALT123
ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.N. Jwala, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent and Sri D. Hanumantha Rao on behalf of the 5th respondent.2. The petitioner in the instant writ petition challenges the proceedings in Letter No. AAE/OP/IDA/JDML/D.No. 130/2K dated 5-6-2000 on the file of the fourth respondent herein.3. The petitioner herein is a small-scale industry engaged in the generation and fabrication works. According to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner's unit is being run in a shed bearing No. D-29 situated in I.D.A. Jeedmetla, Phase-IV. The petitioner claims that he had taken the shed on lease from his brother. His brother is also running an Engineering workshop under the name and style of M/s. Neelam Engineering Works which is a proprietary concern. It is stated that on account of some strained relationship between the petitioner and the 5th respondent herein, the petit...
K. Ravinder and Others Vs. A.P. Generation Corporation Ltd., Hyd. and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD56; [2000(87)FLR842]; (2001)ILLJ213AP
ORDER1. The respondent-Corporation had issued two notifications; firstly RO No.363 of 1998 published in Hindu dated 2-1-1999 for filling up the 60 posts of Sub-Engineers (S.E.) at Kothagudem Thermal Plant (KTPS) limits apart from other vacancies that are sought to be filled up invarious circles and another Notification No.CEE/O&M;/KTPS/V/F.No.33/D.No.503/ 99 dated 2-2-1999 for filling up 222 posts of Junior Plant Attendants (JPA) by direct recruitment while 30-1-1999 was the last date for receipt of the applications from the eligible candidates for filling up the posts of Sub-Engineers and 26-2-1999 was the last date for filling up the posts of Junior Plant Attendants. As far as Sub-Engineers are concerned, they must hold a Diploma in concerned subject under clause 2 of the notification. The selection shall be on the basis of performance in the written test and oral interview. Only those candidates, who qualify in the written examination by being ranked high, community wise will be cal...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »