Andhra Pradesh Court July 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shaik Hasmath Beebi Vs. Dist. Collector and Dist. Magistrate and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2000
Reported in: 2000(2)ALD(Cri)447; 2000(4)ALT687; 2000CriLJ4433
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. This writ petition is filed by one Smt. Shaik Hasmath Beebi, wife of Shaik Khajavalli, the alleged detenu, seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus declaring that the detention of the alleged detenu as illegal and void.2. The brief facts which are not in dispute are that by an order, dated 3-2-2000, the first respondent/District Collector, East Godavari District, ordered detention of the alleged detenu by exercising jurisdiction under Section 3(2) read with Section 3(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-Leggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and consequential arrest of the detenu was effected on 5-2-2000. A representation was made to the second respondent/Government and on such representation, the second respondent/Government confirmed the order of the first respondent /District Collector, East Godavari District, on 18-3-2000, on rec...
K. Ram Mohan Vs. Ntr University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD89; 2000(4)ALT538
ORDER1. The petitioner is the 2nd year student of MBBS. The first respondent conducted examination in pharmacology, Microbiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine at the end of the second year. On 10-6-2000 the results were announced and the petitioner passed in Pharmacology and failed in Microbiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine. The petitioner suspected that the papers in which he failed have not been valued in a fair and objective manner. Therefore, he sought for split up marks memo in these subjects and he was given the same. He got 23 marks in Microbiology, 35 marks in Pathology and 30 marks in Forensic Medicine whereas minimum of 40% is the pass mark. Therefore, he approached this Court for a declaration that the action of the respondent in issuing marks memo dated 3-7-2000 in Microbiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine as illegal and for a direction to the respondents to revalue the answer papers in these three subjects. It is however not denied in the affidavit that there ...
Mir Mohammed Ali Vs. State of A.P. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD51; 2000(4)ALT541; 2000CriLJ4058
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. These two Public Interest Litigation cases may conveniently be disposed of by a common order as they involve same questions of fact and law. An advocate, who is the President of A.P. Prison Reforms and Legal Aid Committee, filed WP No.32039 of 1998. He prayed for a direction to the State Government to appoint a High Level Commission headed by a sitting or retired High Court Judge, to visit and inspect all the prisons in the State and submit a report concerning the conditions of prisons and prisoners with suggestions as to remedial measures, and to direct the State Government to provide proper accommodation and sufficient vehicles and female police escort to transport female prisoners for the purpose of production in the trial Courts, and such other related prayers.2. WP No.6919 of 1999 is filed by a Journalist and Social Worker praying for a declaration that the action of the respondents viz., Government of Andhra Pradesh, Director-General of Police, and the Inspe...
Akilesh Lumani and Others Vs. Principal, Sir C.R. Reddy Autonomous Col ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD630; 2000(4)ALT568
ORDERR. Ramanujam, J. 1. Can thestudents of an Autonomous College, who have failed to attend 75% of the total lectures, claim eligibility to appear at the final examination on the ground that the college has not stipulated such a requirement by framing a Rule or Regulation ?2. This is the main question that arises for our consideration in this appeal filed by the unsuccessful petitioners in Writ Petition No.29673 of 1998.3. The facts that gave rise to the appeal, in brief, are the following :The fourteen, (14) appellants-petitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'students') were the students of Sir C.R. Reddy Autonomous College, Eluru, (hereinafter referred as 'the, College'). During the academic year 1997-98 they were studying either in the first year or in the second year degree courses of B.A./B.Com./B.Sc. When they were not allowed to appear at the final examinations, in the respective courses, by the College, on the ground that they have failed to attend 75% of the lectures, they ap...
Gajjala Rajeswara Reddy Vs. Gajjala Revathi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD124; 2000(5)ALT1; I(2001)DMC171
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J. 1. This CMA is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd November, 1998 in OPNo.12 of 1996 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Cuddapah, wherein the Court below by the impugned order declined to grant divorce to the appellant-petitioner-husband on the ground of cruelty.2. The appellant-husband instituted a petition under Section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (for short 'the Act'), praying the Court to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage with the respondent that had taken place on 28-1-1993 according to the Hindu Religious rites at Zeenath Kalyana Mantapam, Cuddapah, and was consummated- The appellant averred in the petition that the respondent's senior paternal uncle by name Obul Reddy suggested the appellant to allow the respondent-wife's younger brother and sister to slay in his house and provide them education. The appellant expressed his inability to agree with the said suggestion, due to which Mr. Obul Reddy ...
V. Jyothi Vs. V. Suresh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD153; 2000(5)ALT10; I(2001)DMC145
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J 1. This is a matrimonial dispute arising out of a petition filed by the husband, respondent herein, seeking judicial separation from his wife under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Court below by order dated 2nd July, 1997 in OP No.211 of 1996 orderedjudicial separation. Being aggrieved by that order, the respondent-wife, who is appellant herein, preferred this appeal.2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:On 9-2-1992, the marriage between appellant and the respondent herein was performed at Mahboob Mansion, Tamaka, Secunderabad. It was a love marriage performed according to the Hindu customs and rites. The marriage was consummated, but no children were born to them. Both the parties know each other prior to their marriage. The respondent-husband hails from Mudaliar community, and the appellant-wife is Naidu by caste. At the time of marriage, the appellant herein, who is an engineering graduate, was employed in Advanced Radio Mast Limited and the res...
A.P. Private Engineering College Management Association Vs. Govt. of A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD205
ORDER1. Andhra Pradesh PrivateEngineering Colleges Association represented by its Secretary filed this writ petition questioning the action of the State Government in not implementing the policy decision taken by All India Council of Technical Education (hereinafter referred as 'AICTE') with regard to the development fee to be collected from the students admitted to the Professional courses in Private Engineering Colleges under different categories i.e., merit, payment and Non-Resident Indian seats etc. and sought for a direction to the respondents to permit the Managements to collect such fee while granting admission to the students for the academic year 1999-2000 and to pass such other appropriate orders in the interest of justice.2. In view of the importance of the issue raised in the writ petition, I started hearing of this case from 12-8-1999 and during the course of one year it has taken several twists. I need not refer to the entire gamut of the controversy raised by the Governm...
Vummalaneni Saroja Vs. Tenali Municipality, Tenali and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD531; 2000(6)ALT354
ORDER1. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to set aside the leasehold rights granted in favour of the 2nd respondent by the 1st respondent in respect of Ac, 11-00 of land including 39 coconut trees in D.No.468/2, 469/2, 476/2, 477 and 483 situate in Nelapadu village, within the limits of Tenali Municipality, Guntur District.2. The brief facts, according to the petitioner, are : The Tenali Municipality is having Ac.11-00 of wet land situate in D.Mo.468/2, 469/1, 476/2, 477 and 483 in Nelapadu village which is within the limits of Tenali Municipality. The land was acquired for storage of drainage water of Tenali Municipality. As the drainage scheme is not yet finalised, the land is not being utilised for the said purpose. The land is usually called as 'drainage land'. The Tenali Municipality used to lease out the land to third parties every year to raise paddy crop and collect the lease amount . On 19-2-2000, the Municipality issued a Gazette notification calling for applications for co...
Shaik Hayath Saheb Vs. Janupuvaripalle Pyaru Khan Alias Ghouse Khan an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALT537
ORDERI. Venkatanarayana, J.1. Revision petitioner is the plaintiff. The revision petition is directed against the order in I.A. No. 580/1995 on the file of the First Addl. District Munsif's Court, Madanapalle, seeking to bring third parties on record, who are subsequent purchasers. Plaintiff filed the petition under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., seeking to bring on record the subsequent purchasers, who are D-4 to D-7. The trial Court on an erroneous application of law took the ground that defendants 1 and 2, who have no right and title in the property, executed agreement. The 3rd defendant, said to have executed ' the registered sale deed in favour of defendants 4 to 7 in respect of plaint schedule property, is not a party to the agreement of sale. Hence they are not necessary parties. This view of the trial Court is contrary to the well established legal principles of the Apex Court reported in Durga Prasad and Anr v. Deep Chand and Ors., : [1954]1SCR360 . wherein the Supreme Court has clea...
Margam Anjaneyulu, President, Water Users Association Vs. Superintendi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2000
Reported in: 2002(5)ALT206
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. The petitioner seeks to interdict the tender notification in respect of the work relating to repairs to the irrigation canal Peddacheruvu situated at Komtoor Village, Medak Mandal and District.2. The petitioner is the President of the Water Users Association, Komtoor Village. In Komtoor Village there is a tank by name Peddacheruvu. It is a rain fed tank, which spread over a considerable extent. The Water Users Association of which the petitioner is the President has in its area of operation the aforesaid tank.3. The petitioner avers that work having a value of more than Rs. 24 lakhs in Komtoor Village has been entrusted to the Water Users Association and that the Association has executed the said work competently and to the satisfaction of the Government. While so, in respect of repairs to Komtoor Irrigation channel and feeder channel tenders have been called for on 14-6-2000. The value of the work is estimated to be in the order of Rs. 21,81,325/-. It is the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »